Minimal ensembles of side chain conformers for modeling protein–protein interactions
Corresponding Author
Dmitri Beglov
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Dmitri Beglov and David Hall contributed equally to this article.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorDavid R. Hall
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Dmitri Beglov and David Hall contributed equally to this article.
Search for more papers by this authorRyan Brenke
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Search for more papers by this authorMaxim V. Shapovalov
Institute for Cancer Research, Program in Molecular and Translational Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorRoland L. Dunbrack Jr.
Institute for Cancer Research, Program in Molecular and Translational Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dima Kozakov
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sandor Vajda
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dmitri Beglov
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Dmitri Beglov and David Hall contributed equally to this article.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorDavid R. Hall
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Dmitri Beglov and David Hall contributed equally to this article.
Search for more papers by this authorRyan Brenke
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Search for more papers by this authorMaxim V. Shapovalov
Institute for Cancer Research, Program in Molecular and Translational Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorRoland L. Dunbrack Jr.
Institute for Cancer Research, Program in Molecular and Translational Medicine, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Dima Kozakov
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sandor Vajda
BioMolecular Engineering Research Center, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, 44 Cummington Street, Boston, MA 02215===Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The goal of this article is to reduce the complexity of the side chain search within docking problems. We apply six methods of generating side chain conformers to unbound protein structures and determine their ability of obtaining the bound conformation in small ensembles of conformers. Methods are evaluated in terms of the positions of side chain end groups. Results for 68 protein complexes yield two important observations. First, the end-group positions change less than 1 Å on association for over 60% of interface side chains. Thus, the unbound protein structure carries substantial information about the side chains in the bound state, and the inclusion of the unbound conformation into the ensemble of conformers is very beneficial. Second, considering each surface side chain separately in its protein environment, small ensembles of low-energy states include the bound conformation for a large fraction of side chains. In particular, the ensemble consisting of the unbound conformation and the two highest probability predicted conformers includes the bound conformer with an accuracy of 1 Å for 78% of interface side chains. As more than 60% of the interface side chains have only one conformer and many others only a few, these ensembles of low-energy states substantially reduce the complexity of side chain search in docking problems. This approach was already used for finding pockets in protein–protein interfaces that can bind small molecules to potentially disrupt protein–protein interactions. Side-chain search with the reduced search space will also be incorporated into protein docking algorithms. Proteins 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Supporting Information
Additional Supporting Information may be found in the online version of this article.
Filename | Description |
---|---|
PROT_23222_sm_suppinfo.pdf101.7 KB | Supporting Information |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1 Ruvinsky AM,Kirys T,Tuzikov AV,Vakser IA. Side-chain conformational changes upon protein–protein association. J Mol Biol 2011; 408: 356–365.
- 2 Koshland DE. Application of a theory of enzyme specificity to protein synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1958; 44: 98–104.
- 3 Leder L,Berger C,Bornhauser S,Wendt H,Ackermann F,Jelesarov I,Bosshard HR. Spectroscopic calorimetric, and kinetic demonstration of conformational adaptation in peptide–antibody recognition. Biochemistry 1995; 34: 16509–16518.
- 4 Cao Y,Musah RA,Wilcox SK,Goodin DB,McRee DE. Protein conformer selection by ligand binding observed with crystallography. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 72–78.
- 5 Berger C,Weber-Bornhauser S,Eggenberger J,Hanes J,Pluckthun A,Bosshard HR. Antigen recognition by conformational selection. FEBS Lett 1999; 450: 149–153.
- 6 Ma B,Kumar S,Tsai CJ,Nussinov R. Folding funnels and binding mechanisms. Protein Eng 1999; 12: 713–720.
- 7 Tsai CJ,Kumar S,Ma B,Nussinov R. Folding funnels, binding funnels, and protein function. Protein Sci 1999; 8: 1181–1190.
- 8 Boehr DD,Nussinov R,Wright PE. The role of dynamic conformational ensembles in biomolecular recognition. Nat Chem Biol 2009; 5: 789–796.
- 9 Frauenfelder H,Sligar SG,Wolynes PG. The energy landscapes and motions of proteins. Science 1991; 254: 1598–1603.
- 10 Csermely P,Palotai R,Nussinov R. Induced fit, conformational selection and independent dynamic segments: an extended view of binding events. Trends Biochem Sci 2010; 35: 539–546.
- 11 Lee AY,Gulnik SV,Erickson JW. Conformational switching in an aspartic proteinase. Nat Struct Biol 1998; 5: 866–871.
- 12 Nolte RT,Wisely GB,Westin S,Cobb JE,Lambert MH,Kurokawa R,Rosenfeld MG,Willson TM,Glass CK,Milburn MV. Ligand binding and co-activator assembly of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Nature 1998; 395: 137–143.
- 13 Fraser JS,Clarkson MW,Degnan SC,Erion R,Kern D,Alber T. Hidden alternative structures of proline isomerase essential for catalysis. Nature 2009; 462: 669–673.
- 14 Mittermaier A,Kay LE. New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 2006; 312: 224–228.
- 15 Dunbrack RL,Karplus M. Backbone-dependent rotamer library for proteins. Application to side chain prediction. J Mol Biol 1993; 230: 543–574.
- 16 Dunbrack RL. Rotamer libraries in the 21st century. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2002; 12: 431–440.
- 17 Anderson AC,O'Neil RH,Surti TS,Stroud RM. Approaches to solving the rigid receptor problem by identifying a minimal set of flexible residues during ligand docking. Chem Biol 2001; 8: 445–457.
- 18
Najmanovich R,Kuttner J,Sobolev V,Edelman M.
Side-chain flexibility in proteins upon ligand binding.
Proteins
2000;
39:
261–268.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(20000515)39:3<261::AID-PROT90>3.0.CO;2-4 CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 19 Kimura SR,Brower RC,Vajda S,Camacho CJ. Dynamical view of the positions of key side chains in protein–protein recognition. Biophys J 2001; 80: 635–642.
- 20 Rajamani D,Thiel S,Vajda S,Camacho CJ. Anchor residues in protein–protein interactions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 11287–11292.
- 21 Li X,Keskin O,Ma B,Nussinov R,Liang J. Protein–protein interactions: hot spots and structurally conserved residues often locate in complemented pockets that pre-organized in the unbound states: implications for docking. J Mol Biol 2004; 344: 781–795.
- 22 Smith GR,Sternberg MJ,Bates PA. The relationship between the flexibility of proteins and their conformational states on forming protein–protein complexes with an application to protein–protein docking. J Mol Biol 2005; 347: 1077–1101.
- 23 Gray JJ,Moughon S,Wang C,Schueler-Furman O,Kuhlman B,Rohl CA,Baker D. Protein–protein docking with simultaneous optimization of rigid-body displacement and side chain conformations. J Mol Biol 2003; 331: 281–299.
- 24 Kozakov D,Hall DR,Chuang GY,Cencic R,Brenke R,Grove LE,Beglov D,Pelletier J,Whitty A,Vajda S. Structural conservation of druggable hot spots in protein–protein interfaces. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011; 108: 13528–13533.
- 25 Hwang H,Pierce B,Mintseris J,Janin J,Weng Z. Protein–protein docking benchmark version 3.0. Proteins 2008; 73: 705–709.
- 26 Brooks BR,Brooks CL,Mackerell AD,Nilsson L,Petrella RJ,Roux B,Won Y,Archontis G,Bartels C,Boresch S,Caflisch A,Caves L,Cui Q,Dinner AR,Feig M,Fischer S,Gao J,Hodoscek M,Im W,Kuczera K,Lazaridis T,Ma J,Ovchinnikov V,Paci E,Pastor RW,Post CB,Pu JZ,Schaefer M,Tidor B,Venable RM,Woodcock HL,Wu X,Yang W,York DM,Karplus M. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem 2009; 30: 1545–1614.
- 27 Schaefer M,Karplus M. A comprehensive analytical treatment of continuum electrostatics. J Phys Chem 1996; 100: 1578–1599.
- 28 Rainey JK,Goh MC. Statistically based reduced representation of amino acid side chains. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 2004; 44: 817–830.
- 29 Andrusier N,Nussinov R,Wolfson HJ. FireDock: fast interaction refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 2007; 69: 139–159.
- 30 Smoluchowski MV. Versuch einer mathematischen theorie der koagulationskinetik kolloider loeschungen. Z Phys Chem 1917; 92: 129–168.
- 31 Berg PH,von Hippel OG. Diffusion-controlled macromolecular interactions. Annu Rev Biophys Biophys Chem 1985; 14: 131–160.
- 32 Schreiber G,Haran G,Zhou HX. Fundamental aspects of protein–protein association kinetics. Chem Rev 2009; 109: 839–860.
- 33 Camacho CJ,Kimura SR,DeLisi C,Vajda S. Kinetics of desolvation-mediated protein–protein binding. Biophys J 2000; 78: 1094–1105.
- 34 Schlosshauer M,Baker D. Realistic protein–protein association rates from a simple diffusional model neglecting long-range interactions, free energy barriers, and landscape ruggedness. Protein Sci 2004; 13: 1660–1669.
- 35 Vajda S,Kozakov D. Convergence and combination of methods in protein–protein docking. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2009; 19: 164–170.
- 36 Knegtel RM,Kuntz ID,Oshiro CM. Molecular docking to ensembles of protein structures. J Mol Biol 1997; 266: 424–440.
- 37 Lorber DM,Shoichet BK. Flexible ligand docking using conformational ensembles. Protein Sci 1998; 7: 938–950.
- 38 Carlson HA,McCammon JA. Accommodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol Pharmacol 2000; 57: 213–218.
- 39 Totrov M,Abagyan R. Flexible ligand docking to multiple receptor conformations: a practical alternative. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2008; 18: 178–184.
- 40 Huang SY,Zou X. Ensemble docking of multiple protein structures: considering protein structural variations in molecular docking. Proteins 2007; 66: 399–421.