Comparative study on the seismic performance of column-supported silos: Single, row, and group configurations under different storage conditions
Jinping Yang
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorQining Li
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Tingyi Zhang
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Correspondence Tingyi Zhang, College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLingling Jia
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorPeizhen Li
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorJinping Yang
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorQining Li
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Tingyi Zhang
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Correspondence Tingyi Zhang, College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorLingling Jia
College of Civil Engineering, Henan University of Technology, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
Search for more papers by this authorPeizhen Li
State Key Laboratory of Disaster Reduction in Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Grain plays a crucial role in a nation's economic security and public welfare, and the efficient storage of grain in group silos is essential for maintaining these reserves. As a global leader in grain production, consumption, and imports, China also holds a significant position in grain reserves. Based on shake table tests and actual case studies, this study explores the seismic mechanisms and failure modes of column-supported group silos using the Abaqus finite element simulation method. This study includes shaking table test verification and a refined numerical simulation method for column-supported silos. The dynamic responses, natural frequency, acceleration, and lateral pressure of storage material are analyzed to verify the rationality of numerical methods. Additionally, this study investigates the implementation and mechanisms of the material–structure interaction system in Abaqus, including the selection of material constitutive models, earthquake records, element size division, and grain–structure contact issues. Then, finite element models of different silo structures are built for single silos, row silos, and group silos. The modal shapes, natural frequencies, acceleration responses, relative displacement responses, and lateral pressure of storage material under the action of EL-Centro waves, Kobe waves, and artificial waves are investigated to reveal the seismic response mechanisms of column-supported silo structures under different storage material conditions. This research not only helps guide practical engineering design but also provides a scientific supplement to existing silo seismic theories.
CONFLICTS OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES
- 1Calvi GM, Pinho R, Magenes G, et al. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET J Earthq Technol. 2006; 43(3): 75-104.
- 2Nascimbene R. Investigation of seismic damage to existing buildings by using remotely observed images. Eng Fail Anal. 2024; 161:108282.
10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108282 Google Scholar
- 3Zhang D, Yang Q, Wang S. Research on seismic response and dynamic lateral pressure of the silo model under dynamic interaction between granular materials and the silo wall. Struct Concr. 2024; 25(3): 1988-1998.
10.1002/suco.202300499 Google Scholar
- 4Togarsi Rajani S. Seismic response of reinforced concrete silos. Int J Res Eng Technol. 2015; 4: 174-178.
10.15623/ijret.2015.0409030 Google Scholar
- 5Silva FA, Horowitz B, Delgado JM, Azevedo AC. Design of Reinforced Concrete Silo Groups. Springer International Publishing; 2019.
10.1007/978-3-030-13621-5 Google Scholar
- 6Pang Y, Wei K, Wang J, Zhang S. An efficient and accurate fragility approach for seismic performance assessment of structures. Earthq Eng Resil. 2023; 2(4): 403-417.
10.1002/eer2.64 Google Scholar
- 7Li Z, Lu J, Teng J. Seismic performance loss evaluation of reinforced concrete frame structure based on updatable damage model. Earthq Eng Resil. 2024; 3(1): 152-173.
10.1002/eer2.68 Google Scholar
- 8Demir AD, Livaoglu R. SSI effects on seismic response of RC flat-bottom circular silos. Structures. 2023; 57:105296.
10.1016/j.istruc.2023.105296 Google Scholar
- 9Demir AD, Livaoglu R. Simplified seismic response model for a bulk solid- silo-embedded foundation/soil system. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2023; 165:107664.
10.1016/j.soildyn.2022.107664 Google Scholar
- 10Jagtap P, Chakraborty T, Matsagar V. Nonlinear dynamic behavior of granular materials in base excited silos. Mech Adv Mater Struct. 2015; 22(4): 313-323.
- 11Xu Q, Zhang H, Liu Q, Wang L. Seismic analysis on reinforced concrete group silos through shaking table tests. Struct Concr. 2021; 22(3): 1285-1296.
- 12Silvestri S, Ivorra S, Chiacchio LD, et al. Shaking-table tests of flat-bottom circular silos containing grain-like material. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn. 2016; 45(1): 69-89.
10.1002/eqe.2617 Google Scholar
- 13Charalampakis AE, Tsiatas GC, Kotsiantis SB. Machine learning and nonlinear models for the estimation of fundamental period of vibration of masonry infilled RC frame structures. Eng Struct. 2020; 216:110765.
- 14Livaoglu R, Durmuş A. A simplified approximation for seismic analysis of silo-bulk material system. Bull Earthq Eng. 2016; 14(3): 863-887.
- 15Holler S, Meskouris K. Granular material silos under dynamic excitation: numerical simulation and experimental validation. J Struct Eng. 2006; 132(10): 1573-1579.
- 16Abdel-Rahim HHA. Response the cylindrical elevated wheat storage silos to seismic loading. IOSR J Eng. 2014; 4(1): 42-55.
10.9790/3021-04164255 Google Scholar
- 17Duan J, Han Y, Li D. The dynamic behavior of silos with grain-like material during earthquakes. Sustainability. 2023; 15(10): 7970.
10.3390/su15107970 Google Scholar
- 18Silvestri S, Ivorra S, Chiacchio LD, et al. Shaking-table tests of flat-bottom circular silos containing grain-like material. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2016; 45: 69-89.
- 19Pieraccini L, Silvestri S, Trombetti T. Refinements to the Silvestri's theory for the evaluation of the seismic actions in flat-bottom silos containing grain-like material. Bull Earthq Eng. 2015; 13(11): 3493-3525.
- 20Jing H, Wang X, Yang J, Chen H. Static and seismic pressure of cylindrical steel silo model with granular materials. J Constr Steel Res. 2022; 198:107515.
10.1016/j.jcsr.2022.107515 Google Scholar
- 21Chen J, Ding Y, Xu Q, et al. Seismic response of column-supported silos considering granular-structure interaction. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2024; 53(13): 1-23.
10.1002/eqe.4210 Google Scholar
- 22Gabbianelli G, Perrone D, Nascimbene R, Paolacci F. Seismic Vulnerability Assessment and Fragility Functions Derivation for Steel Storage Legged Tanks. In: Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 86199. 2022:V005T08A016.
10.1115/PVP2022-84416 Google Scholar
- 23Khalil M, Ruggieri S, Tateo V, Nascimbene R, Uva G. A numerical procedure to estimate seismic fragility of cylindrical ground-supported steel silos containing granular-like material. Bulle Earthq Eng. 2023; 21: 5915-5947.
- 24Nascimbene R, Rassati GA. Seismic design and evaluation of elevated steel tanks supported by concentric braced frames. CivilEng. 2024; 5: 521-536.
10.3390/civileng5020027 Google Scholar
- 25Benkhellat S, Kada O, Seghir A, Kadri M. Seismic damage assessment of reinforced concrete grain silos. Int J Struct Stabil Dyn. 2022; 22(01):2250005.
10.1142/S0219455422500055 Google Scholar
- 26Wilde K, Rucka M, Tejchman J. Silo music-mechanism of dynamic flow and structure interaction. Powder Technol. 2008; 186(2): 113-129.
- 27Wilde K, Tejchman J, Rucka M, Niedostatkiewicz M. Experimental and theoretical investigations of silo music. Powder Technol. 2010; 198(1): 38-48.
- 28Guo K, Zhou C, Meng L, Zhang X. Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete silo considering granular material-structure interaction. Struct Des Tall Spec Build. 2016; 25(18): 1011-1030.
10.1002/tal.1295 Google Scholar
- 29Benkhellat S, Kadri M, Seghir A. Numerical investigation of the effects of soil-structure and granular material-structure interaction on the seismic response of a flat-bottom reinforced concrete silo. Earthq Eng Eng Vib. 2024; 23(3): 609-623.
10.1007/s11803-024-2260-x Google Scholar
- 30Zeng C, Wang Y. The shear strength and dilatancy behavior of wheat stored in silos. Complexity. 2019; 2019(1): 1-9.
10.1155/2019/1547616 Google Scholar
- 31Gandia RM, de Paula WC, de Oliveira Junior EA, et al. Effect of the hopper angle of a silo on the vertical stress at the cylinder-to-hopper transition. Agronomy. 2022; 12(4): 830.
10.3390/agronomy12040830 Google Scholar
- 32Maraveas C. Concrete silos: failures, design issues and repair/strengthening methods. Appl Sci. 2020; 10(11): 3938.
- 33Yang J, Feng G, Jing H, Zhang F. Seismic response and theoretical analysis of grain bulk material-steel silo structure under earthquake action. J Constr Steel Res. 2023; 211:108207.
10.1016/j.jcsr.2023.108207 Google Scholar
- 34Yang J, Zhang F, Li P, Jing H. Seismic performance of column-bearing silo structure with granular materials considering SSI effect. Structures. 2023; 47: 595-606.
- 35Li S, Zhao W, Guo Z. Study on dynamic characteristics of silo-stock-foundation interaction system under seismic load. Open Phys. 2018; 16(1): 435-440.
10.1515/phys-2018-0060 Google Scholar
- 36Durmuş A, Livaoglu R. A simplified 3 DOF model of A FEM model for seismic analysis of a silo containing elastic material accounting for soil-structure interaction. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2015; 77: 1-14.
- 37Wang S. Thermal analysis of cylindrical concrete shell at transition boundary between regions with different reinforcement configurations. Eng Struct. 2015; 84: 279-286.
10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.11.038 Google Scholar
- 38Khalil M, Ruggieri S, Uva G. Assessment of structural behaviour, vulnerability, and risk of industrial silos: state-of-the-art and recent research trends. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(6): 3006.
- 39Dogangun A, Karaca Z, Durmus A, Sezen H. Cause of damage and failures in silo structures. J Perform Constr Facil. 2009; 23(2): 65-71.
- 40Li X, Ding Y, Liu Q, Xu Q. Experimental study on horizontal pressure of column-supported concrete group silos under earthquake force. J Asian Arch Build Eng. 2023; 22(5): 2827-2838.
10.1080/13467581.2022.2160637 Google Scholar
- 41Chen J, Ding Y, Xu Q, et al. Evaluation method and experimental study on seismic performance of column-supported group silo. Struct Eng Mech. 2024; 90(6): 577-590.
- 42Yuksel SB, Arslan MH. Design force estimation using artificial neural network for groups of four cylindrical silos. Adv Struct Eng. 2010; 13(4): 681-693.
10.1260/1369-4332.13.4.681 Google Scholar
- 43Yuksel SB. Design formulas for the groups of six cylindrical silos due to interstice loadings. Adv Struct Eng. 2011; 14(2): 265-280.
10.1260/1369-4332.14.2.265 Google Scholar
- 44Furinghetti M, Mansour S, Marra M, et al. Shaking table tests of a full-scale base-isolated flat-bottom steel silo equipped with curved surface slider bearings. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng. 2024; 176:108321.
10.1016/j.soildyn.2023.108321 Google Scholar
- 45Kanyilmaz A, Castiglioni CA. Reducing the seismic vulnerability of existing elevated silos by means of base isolation devices. Eng Struct. 2017; 143: 477-497.
- 46Gabbianelli G, Milanesi RR, Gandelli E, et al. Seismic vulnerability assessment of steel storage tanks protected through sliding isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn. 2023; 52(9): 2597-2618.
10.1002/eqe.3885 Google Scholar
- 47 Abaqus. Dassault Systèmes; 2023.
- 48Yang JY, Liu C, Jia L. Model test on the cumulative damage and shaking table for the tower of column bearing silo. J Water Res Archit Eng. 2018; 16(3).
- 49Yang J, Ding M, Miao H. Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Characteristics of Reinforced Concrete Column-Supported Sing Silo, Row Silo and Group Silo Structures. The 9th International Symposium on Lifeline and Infrastructure Earthquake Engineering (ISLIEE 2024), Beijing, No 35; 2024.
