Volume 3, Issue 6 e253
REVIEW ARTICLE
Open Access

Chances and challenges in intranasal administration delivery for brain disease treatment

Shuyu Zheng

Shuyu Zheng

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Key Laboratory of Precise Treatment and Clinical Translational Research of Neurological Diseases, Hangzhou, China

These authors contributed equally to this article.

Search for more papers by this author
Yuanyuan Guo

Yuanyuan Guo

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

These authors contributed equally to this article.

Search for more papers by this author
Furong Yan

Furong Yan

Center of Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China

These authors contributed equally to this article.

Search for more papers by this author
Feng Yan

Feng Yan

Department of Neurosurgery, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

Key Laboratory of Precise Treatment and Clinical Translational Research of Neurological Diseases, Hangzhou, China

Search for more papers by this author
Ruogu Qi

Corresponding Author

Ruogu Qi

Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, China

Correspondence

Ruogu Qi, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China. Email: [email protected]

Jianliang Shen, National Engineering Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Jianliang Shen

Corresponding Author

Jianliang Shen

National Engineering Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

Zhejiang Engineering Research Center for Tissue Repair Materials, Wenzhou Institute, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wenzhou, China

Correspondence

Ruogu Qi, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, School of Medicine and Holistic Integrative Medicine, Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210023, China. Email: [email protected]

Jianliang Shen, National Engineering Research Center of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China. Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 November 2023
Citations: 2

Abstract

In order to overcome the formidable challenges posed by the intricate physiological barriers of the brain, the employment of intranasal administration (INA) has emerged as an unconventional method for drug delivery, offering distinct advantages such as non-invasiveness and enhanced pharmacokinetic characteristics within the brain. Primarily exploiting the distinct conduit offered by the olfactory and/or trigeminal nerve systems, the INA route effectively delivers therapeutic agents. With introducing appropriate improvements to the drug formulation, such as the incorporation of nanocarriers, the efficacious delivery via the INA approach has gained considerable traction for the treatment of neurological disorders. This concise review highlights the notable progress in INA delivery and explores the potential therapeutic modalities inherent in this promising paradigm.

1 THE WAY TO THE BRAIN

The intricate workings of the brain rely on a carefully balanced homeostatic environment that governs the ionic composition of the interstitial fluid. This delicate regulation is maintained through the concerted efforts of various protective structures within the central nervous system (CNS), encompassing the skull, meninges, blood-brain barrier (BBB) and blood-cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) barrier (Figure 1).1-3 These barriers not only serve as the crucial purpose of safeguarding the brain but also impose significant limitations on the effective delivery of therapeutic drugs to the brain parenchyma, thereby impeding the treatment of brain disorders. In light of such a challenge, intranasal administration (INA) has emerged as a novel avenue for drug entry into the brain initially pioneered by William H. Frey in the 1990s. Nowadays, INA has since been applied in a diverse array of drug delivery approaches, encompassing chemical drugs, liposomes, oncolytic viruses for tumour vaccines and other relevant substrates.4-6

Details are in the caption following the image
The way to the brain anatomical locations and organizations of the blood-brain and blood-cerebrospinal fluid barriers and the olfactory portal. The surface of the brain is covered by the skull and the meninges, which consist of the dura mater, arachnoid mater and pia mater. The choroid plexus produces cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and forms the blood-CSF barrier. The arachnoid mater and pia mater are connected by strands of connective tissue called arachnoid trabeculae, which course through the CSF-containing subarachnoid space. The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a specialized vascular system consisting of tight junctions between endothelial cells lining cerebral microvessels, in addition to pericytes and astrocytes. The olfactory system bypasses the cellular barriers of the central nervous system (CNS) and provides a direct portal from the nasal cavity to the olfactory bulb within the brain.

2 MAIN PHYSIOLOGICAL PATHWAYS OF INA IN THE BRAIN

The INA delivery system plays an important role in bypassing the brain barriers. Studies have indicated that INA primarily relies on two routes to transport drugs into the brain: (1) Neural pathways: This route involves the drug entering the brain through the olfactory nerve and trigeminal nerve, which are located beneath the nasal mucosa. The olfactory nerve is directly connected to the olfactory bulb, while the trigeminal nerve connects to the brainstem. By utilizing these neural pathways, drugs can bypass the BBB and directly reach the brain. (2) Vascular route: In this route, the drug initially enters the systemic circulation by crossing the capillaries in the nasal mucosa. From there, it can then cross the BBB through various mechanisms to reach the brain. This route involves the drug traveling through the bloodstream to gain access to the brain. Both of these routes play a significant role in facilitating the delivery of drugs to the brain through the intranasal administration method. By utilizing the INA delivery system, drugs can potentially achieve higher concentrations in the brain compared to other administration methods, offering a promising approach for targeted drug delivery to the central nervous system7, 8(Figure 2).

Details are in the caption following the image
Main physiological pathways and drug carriers of intranasal administration (INA) into the brain. The intracranial delivery pathway mainly includes direct one and indirect one to the brain. For the direct pathway, drug could penetrate through the olfactory nerve, which connects the olfactory bulb with the olfactory region of the nasal cavity, or through the trigeminal nerve that also innervates the respiratory part of the nasal epithelium. For the indirect way, drug could be absorbed through the nasal mucosa into systemic circulation. The pre-clinical delivered drug formulations usually are not in simple solution, but in the nano-carriers including polymeric particles, solid-liquid nanoparticles (SLN) and oil in water (O/W) emulsion etc.

Indeed, the INA route has several appealing aspects when it comes to drug delivery. Some of these advantages include: (1) Direct absorption into the brain: The nasal mucosa is highly vascularized, allowing for direct absorption of drugs into the brain. This bypasses the need for drugs to go through the gastrointestinal tract or undergo first-pass metabolism in the liver, resulting in a faster onset of action. (2) Reduced dose requirements: By avoiding first-pass metabolism and pharmacokinetic variations associated with oral administration, lower doses of medications may be required to achieve the desired therapeutic effect. This can potentially minimize side effects and improve patient compliance.8, 11

However, INA does have certain limitations that can affect the bioavailability of drugs in the brain: (1) Absorption capacity of nasal mucosa: The nasal mucosa has a limited surface area, and its absorption capacity can restrict the amount of drug that can be absorbed. This limitation may require optimization of drug formulations to enhance absorption and increase bioavailability. (2) High molecular weight of drugs: Drugs with high molecular weights may face challenges in crossing the nasal mucosa and reaching the brain. Modification of drug formulations or the use of drug delivery systems, such as nanocarriers, can help overcome this limitation by improving drug stability and penetration. (3) Biodegradation of drugs: The nasal mucosa contains enzymes that can degrade certain drugs, reducing their bioavailability. Modifications to drug formulations, such as the use of prodrugs or enzyme inhibitors, can help improve drug stability and prolong their presence in the nasal mucosa.9, 10

To fully realize the potential applications of INA, utilizing appropriate drug modifications and formulations such as nanocarriers made from biomaterials to enhance drug stability, prolong drug releasing and improve drug penetration into the brain are necessary. These modifications aim to address the limitations associated with the INA route and maximize the therapeutic benefits of intranasal drug delivery.9-11

3 PRECLINICAL AND CLINICAL APPLICATION OF INA DELIVERY SYSTEM TO TREAT NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS

Currently, INA has found extensive use in the treatment of various neurological conditions (Figure 3), including: (1) Neurodegenerative diseases: INA has been investigated for the treatment of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease. Studies in animal models have shown promising results using INA for the delivery of insulin, nanoparticles, in situ gelation systems, and peptides to improve the symptoms associated with these diseases.5, 12-15 (2) CNS Injuries (e.g., Stroke): INA has also been explored for the treatment of CNS injuries, particularly stroke. (3) Brain tumours: INA has been studied as a delivery method for treating brain tumours. It offers a non-invasive approach to deliver anticancer drugs directly to the brain, bypassing the blood-brain barrier and minimizing systemic side effects. (4) mental disorders: INA has shown promise in the treatment of mental disorders. Research has focused on using INA to deliver medications, such as antipsychotics and antidepressants, for improved drug delivery to the brain and enhanced therapeutic outcomes. While preclinical studies have demonstrated the positive effects of INA in animal models, translational studies in humans are relatively limited. One notable double-blind clinical trial involved 289 adults who were randomized to receive nasal insulin delivery or a placebo. The study concluded that there were no observed cognitive or functional benefits from nasal insulin treatment compared to the placebo group.16 This highlights the need for further research and larger clinical trials to determine the efficacy of INA in treating neurological conditions in humans.

Details are in the caption following the image
Clinical application of intranasal administration (INA) delivery system to treat neurological disorders. The most high-profile ongoing clinical applications for neurological disorders are mainly concentrated in neurodegenerative diseases (i.e., Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease), central nervous system (CNS) injuries (i.e., stroke) and brain tumours (i.e., glioma). The delivered therapeutic systems include stem cells, nano-carrier loaded drug delivery, tumour vaccines and nucleic acid therapeutic drugs. SLN, solid-liquid nanoparticles.

Notably, INA of stem cells is emerging as a promising therapy for treating CNS injuries, owing to the advantages of stem cells in functional repair of cerebrovascular diseases. It has been demonstrated that peripheral vascular endothelial progenitor cells have the ability to repair damaged vascular endothelial cells, promoting vascular regeneration in vivo.17, 18 Moreover, clinical studies have provided evidence that INA of mesenchymal stromal cells in neonates following perinatal arterial ischemic stroke is a feasible approach, with no significant adverse events observed in patients followed up to 3 months of age. Nevertheless, further clinical trials are necessary to fully harness the potential of stem cells for CNS injury treatment. Therefore, achieving outputs in this area will contribute to advancing the clinical utilization of stem cells in the field of CNS injury treatment.19-21

Brain tumours, particularly glioma, are a significant category of brain diseases that pose a significant challenge in terms of treatment. The low bioavailability of most drugs due to their limited ability to penetrate the BBB necessitates the development of new drug treatment systems.22 INA in combination with nano-delivery systems has emerged as a promising approach to address these issues through significantly enhancing drug efficacy. By utilizing nanocarriers, the nasal residence time of drugs can be extended, resulting in substantial improvements in pharmacokinetics and biodistribution within the intranasal nano-delivery system.23, 24 Various systems are currently employed for nasal drug delivery, including vesicular systems such as liposomes, emulsion systems like nanoemulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles, and micellar systems.25-27 These systems facilitate the efficient delivery of drugs to the brain through INA. Additionally, recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy have focused on the INA of tumour vaccines for glioma treatment. This includes the use of oncolytic viruses, short peptides, and synthesized antibodies.28

Besides, in order to promote these systems further into clinical practice, tracking technologies with high spatiotemporal resolution are in demand. Tracking material functionalized with optical and biological properties, that is, gold nanorods with fluorescent probes, could provide real-time spatiotemporal information for brain uptake pattern and distribution after INA. Recent developments in imaging technologies such as optical imaging, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and autoradiography both show benefits and limitations. For example, ICP-MS could provide sensitive quantification of gold content measurement, while it is labor intensive without offering intracellular information.24

4 CONCLUSION AND PERSPECTIVES

The successful clinical application of therapeutic drugs targeting specific CNS disorders relies on an effective drug delivery pathway with optimal bioavailability in the CNS. The INA delivery system offers a direct and efficient non-invasive route for delivering drugs to the brain. Recent advancements have demonstrated the potential of the INA delivery system in the treatment of various conditions, including migraines, cognitive dysfunction disorders, cerebral hemorrhages and tumours. However, despite notable progress in recent years, there is still a substantial gap between these achievements and their clinical translation (Table 1). Several key aspects warrant further research in this field:

TABLE 1. The most recent clinical trials upon neurological disorders treated by intranasal administration (INA) registered in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Clinical trial Intervention Study phase Goal Outcome measures Year of initiation
NCT04091503
  • Drug: Intranasal
  • Modified
  • Temozolomide
Phase I
  • Enrollment: 30 persons
  • Glioma, malignant
  • Gliosarcoma
  • Astrocytoma of
  • Brain
  • The randomized study to determine the safety of Intranasal Administration of modified Temozolomide.
  • The maximum tolerated therapeutic dose (MTD) of modified Temozolomide for
  • intranasal administration
2019
NCT00748956
  • Drug: Low dose
  • Neuropeptide Y
  • •Drug: High dose
  • Neuropeptide Y
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase II
  • Enrollment: 10 persons
  • Mood disorder
  • Anxiety disorders
  • Levels of NPY in CSF
  • Systematic Assessment of Treatment-Emergent Effects (SAFTEE)
  • Appetite Scale
  • Post-sleep Questionnaire
  • Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms (QIDS)
  • Profile of Mood States (POMS)
2010
NCT03081416
  • Drug: Ketamine
  • Drug: Normal saline
  • Drug:
  • Metoclopramide
  • Drug: Ketorolac
  • Drug:
  • Dexamethasone
  • Drug: Benadryl
Phase III
  • Enrollment: 80 persons
  • Headache
  • VAS 30 min
  • VAS 60 min
  • NRS at discharge
  • NRS 24 h
  • NRS 72 h
  • Side effects
  • Repeat ED/primary care encounters
2016
NCT02414503
  • Drug: 8IU
  • intranasal oxytocin
  • Drug: 24IU
  • intranasal oxytocin
  • Drug: Placebo
  • Device: OptiNose
  • Breath Powered Bi
Phase I & II
  • Enrollment: 17 persons
  • Autism spectrum
  • Disorder
  • Performance on an emotion sensitivity test
  • Performance on a facial emotion morphing task
  • Performance on the reading the mind in the eyes test
  • Performance on an emotional dot probe task
  • Heart rate variability
  • Eyetracking
2015
NCT01533519
  • Drug: Neuropeptide Y
Phase I
  • Enrollment: 26 persons
  • Post-traumatic
  • Stress Disorder
  • Patient Rated Inventory of Side Effects (PRISE)
  • State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI)
  • Change in Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI)
2012
NCT00422981
  • Drug: AL-108
  • Drug: Placebo
Phase II
  • Enrollment: 144 persons
  • Mild cognitive
  • Impairment
  • Change from baseline to week 12 on the Composite Memory Variable
  • Changes in the Composite Memory Variable from baseline to weeks 4, 8 and 16
  • Changes in test battery individual items from baseline to endpoints (weeks 4, 8, 12 and 16).
2007

(1) Animal models that accurately reflect clinical evaluation: Suitable animal models are useful for characterizing the nasal absorption and pharmacokinetic nature of INA. However, due to the anatomical and physiological differences among species (Table 2), there remains a gap between animal models and human clinical practice.29, 30 Besides, although improvement in motor features after INA delivery can be well assessed in animal models, the evaluation of non-motor functions such as mood, sleep conditions and cognition remains limited and requires further development.31, 32

TABLE 2. Anatomy and physiology difference among interspecies comparison of intranasal administration (INA).
Species Mean nasal volume (mL) Mean nasal length (cm) Mean nasal surface area (cm2) Conchae structure Expected clearance half-life (min)
Human 20 7.5 160 Single scroll 15
Monkey 8 10 62 Single scroll 10
Guinea pig 0.9 3.4 27 Double scroll 7
Dog 20 10 221 Branching 20
Rabbit 6 5.2 61 Branching 10
Rat 0.4 2.3 14 Double scroll 5
Mouse 0.03 0.5 2.8 Double scroll 1

(2) Multimodal real-time tracing system for precise assessment of INA delivery efficiency: Currently, the quantification of INA delivery efficiency primarily relies on mathematical modeling and tomographic slices. To advance our understanding, additional multimodal imaging technologies are needed for studying brain cell uptake and the real-time localization of drugs.33-36

(3) In-depth investigation of interactions between nano-delivery systems, drug formulation, and neural pathways: The precise mechanism by which drugs enter the brain through INA delivery systems remains unclear. Combining in-silico modeling of the intranasal environment with experimental studies on drug-nanocarrier interactions and their interactions with cells can provide valuable insights for the rational design of drug delivery systems.37

The precise mechanism by which drugs enter the brain through INA delivery systems is still not fully understood. A comprehensive understanding of this process can be achieved through the application of in silico modeling techniques to simulate the intranasal environment. Additionally, conducting experimental studies to investigate the interactions among the drug, nanocarriers, and cells involved in the delivery process is crucial. These investigations can provide valuable insights and contribute to the rational design of drug delivery systems for INA, ultimately enhancing their efficacy and clinical applicability.38-41

In summary, the INA approach holds promise as a therapeutic strategy to overcome the limitations imposed by the BBB. To fully realize the potential of INA in the treatment of brain diseases, further interdisciplinary collaboration and research efforts are needed. By working together, scientists and healthcare professionals can optimize the INA delivery system, develop novel drug formulations, and improve our understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Addressing these research areas will contribute to enhancing our understanding of the INA delivery system, optimizing drug delivery to the CNS, and advancing the development of effective therapies for CNS disorders. This collaborative approach will pave the way for more effective and targeted treatments for a wide range of brain diseases in the future.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number: 82004081, 52073145, and 82200043 and the National Natural Science Foundation of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, grant number: NZY82004081.

    CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

    The authors declare no competing interests.

    DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

    Please contact the corresponding author for all data requests.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.