Volume 37, Issue S3 pp. 7-14
Numerical Evaluation Method

Automated large scale evaluation of protein structure predictions

Peter Lackner

Peter Lackner

Center for Applied Molecular Engineering, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Walter A. Koppensteiner

Walter A. Koppensteiner

Center for Applied Molecular Engineering, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Francisco S. Domingues

Francisco S. Domingues

Center for Applied Molecular Engineering, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Manfred J. Sippl

Corresponding Author

Manfred J. Sippl

Center for Applied Molecular Engineering, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria

Center for Applied Molecular Engineering, Institute for Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Salzburg, Jakob Haringer Straße 3, A-5020 Salzburg, Austria===Search for more papers by this author

Abstract

Evaluation and assessment are critical issues in CASP experiments. Automated procedures are necessary to compare a large number of predictions with the target folds. The evaluation has to reveal the maximum extent of similarity between predictions and targets, it should be applicable across prediction categories, and it should be transparent and accessible to a wide community. Here we present an automated evaluation scheme which is an attempt to meet these requirements. In the implementation and execution of this scheme we had to solve or circumvent problems of convergence, where algorithms fail to find optimum solutions, problems of ambiguity where no unique optimum solution exists, and problems in ranking and interpretation. Key features of this implementation are (1) the root mean square deviation of structure superimposition is kept close to a constant value throughout the evaluation and (2) all structural matches found between two folds are taken into account. We discuss these points in detail and describe the numerical criteria used in the CASP3 evaluation. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:7–14. © 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.