Volume 35, Issue 6 pp. 706-714
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison of the modified Masood's scoring index versus international academy of cytology Yokohama system in the categorization of breast fine needle aspirates

Adil Aziz Khan

Adil Aziz Khan

Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sana Ahuja

Sana Ahuja

Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Shakthivel V

Shakthivel V

Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
Sufian Zaheer

Corresponding Author

Sufian Zaheer

Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Correspondence

Sufian Zaheer, Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sunil Ranga

Sunil Ranga

Department of Pathology, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College and Safdarjung Hospital, New Delhi, India

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 August 2024

Abstract

Context

The Modified Masood Scoring Index (MMSI) categorizes breast fine needle aspirates into four categories non-proliferative breast diseases (PBD), PBD without atypia, PBD with atypia and carcinoma in situ/carcinoma. The International Academy of Cytology Yokohama System classifies the aspirates into five categories – inadequate, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant. Very few studies have been conducted so far to compare the diagnostic accuracy of this system.

Aims

The objectives of the study were to classify breast fine needle aspirates according to the MMSI and IAC Yokohama and assess their risk of malignancy (ROM) and performance parameters.

Materials and Methods

All breast FNAs received from June 2020 to May 2023 were classified according to the MMSI and IAC Yokohama. Using histopathological diagnosis as the gold standard, ROM and performance parameters were calculated.

Results

Out of the 559 breast fine needle aspirates, the histopathological correlation was available for 337 cases. The ROM for non-PBD, PBD without atypia, PBD with atypia and carcinoma in situ/carcinoma categories were 0%, 1.2%, 9.1% and 93%, respectively. The ROM for each of the categories of Yokohama system was 16.6%, 1.1%, 4.3%, 86.2% and 97.6%, respectively. The values for the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy were slightly higher for IAC Yokohama (97.3%, 97.2%, 94.7%, 98.6% and 97.2%, respectively) than the MMSI (96.4%, 96.2%, 93%, 98.1% and 96.3%, respectively). Furthermore, another shortfall of MMSI is the inability to compare the Inadequate category of the Yokohama system.

Conclusion

Overall Yokohama system proved to be a better system for categorizing breast lesions on FNAB as the scoring system provides more objective categorization and minimizes false positive and false negative cases.

Graphical Abstract

The study compares the Modified Masood Scoring Index (MMSI) and the International Academy of Cytology (IAC) Yokohama System in categorizing breast fine needle aspirates, finding the Yokohama System to have higher diagnostic accuracy and better performance parameters, with a lower risk of false positives and negatives. Both systems are assessed against histopathological diagnoses, with the Yokohama System demonstrating superior sensitivity, specificity, and overall diagnostic accuracy in categorizing breast lesions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data is available from the corresponding author on request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.