International Diabetes Federation 2017
Abstract
Ann M. Carracher, Payal H. Marathe, and Kelly L. Close are of Close Concerns (http://www.closeconcerns.com), a healthcare information company focused exclusively on diabetes and obesity care. Close Concerns publishes Closer Look, a periodical that brings together news and insights in these areas. Each month, the Journal of Diabetes includes this News feature, in which Carracher, Marathe, and Close review the latest developments relevant to researchers and clinicians.
More than 8000 delegates from 165 countries gathered in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, for the International Diabetes Federation's 2017 Congress. Dr Mike Lean (University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK) presented 1-year data from the DiRECT trial,1 which randomized 298 participants (recently diagnosed adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D; not on insulin) to intensive weight loss intervention (withdrawal of antidiabetic or antihypertensive drugs, total diet replacement with approximately 800 calories/day for 3–5 months, stepped food reintroduction for 2–8 weeks, and structured support for long-term weight maintenance) or to standard of care for the UK. Dr Lean reported that 24% of participants receiving intensive weight loss intervention (36/149) achieved ≥15 kg (~33 lb) weight loss, and that 46% of this treatment arm (68 individuals) achieved diabetes remission. Mean weight loss for the intervention group was 14.5 kg (~30 lb) after meal replacement, and mean weight regain at 12 months was 2 kg (~4.4 lb). In those losing ≥15 kg, 86% achieved diabetes remission, and Dr Lean thus underscored the apparent relationship between magnitude of weight loss and likelihood of diabetes remission. No member of the control group experienced ≥15 kg weight loss (P < 0.0001 for comparison), although 4% (6/149) did achieve diabetes remission with a mean 5% body weight reduction (P < 0.0001 for comparison). Dr Lean announced that economic analyses are underway to determine the cost-effectiveness of delivering the intensive weight loss intervention (in DiRECT, the treatment was implemented by modestly trained usual care providers). He shared that 32 participants dropped out of the treatment arm due to the intervention's demands or lack of appeal. Dr Roy Taylor (Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK) shared in discussion that shorter duration of diabetes predicted responders versus non-responders in a subgroup of DiRECT, and Dr Lean later clarified that people with longer duration of diabetes who lose a substantial amount of body weight can achieve diabetes remission, although the best results appear in individuals with shorter disease duration; 2- and 3-year data from DiRECT are still being collected.
During the same symposium, researchers presented findings from the DISCOVER study,2 a large-scale effort in real-world data collection spanning 38 countries and enrolling 15 992 patients with T2D, about to initiate second-line therapy. The primary objective of the program, as presented by Dr Linong Ji (Peking University Diabetes Center, Beijing, China), is to describe diabetes management patterns and disease evolution over 3 years for people initiating a second-line glucose-lowering therapy. Dr Mikhail Kosiborod (University of Missouri, Kansas City, MO, USA) presented key findings from the program so far (the 3 years of planned follow-up is ongoing): <80% of participants had a recorded HbA1c assessment, revealing gaps in screening and monitoring. The HbA1c screening rate was lowest in Africa, at 57%, followed by Southeast Asia (61%), ranging up to the Eastern Mediterranean (94%). When screening was defined as HbA1c or fasting plasma glucose evaluations, the rate increased, but was still <90% globally. Mean HbA1c across the entire global study population was 8.4%, from a high of 8.7% in the Eastern Mediterranean to a low of 8.1% in Europe. Nearly one-third of the population initiating a second-line therapy had HbA1c ≥9%, whereas 55% had HbA1c ≥8% and only 15% met an HbA1c target <7%. The prevalence of microvascular complications (chronic kidney disease, albuminuria, retinopathy, retinal laser photocoagulation, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, or erectile dysfunction) was 18% globally, ranging from 13% in the Americas to 22% in Southeast Asia. Macrovascular complications (coronary artery disease, stroke, transient ischemic attack, carotid artery stenting, carotid endarterectomy, peripheral artery disease, diabetic foot, amputation, defibrillator use, or heart failure) appeared in 13% of the overall study population, ranging from 10% in Africa and the Americas to 18% in Europe. Dr Kosiborod's main takeaway from these data was that a large proportion of patients relatively early in the course of diabetes (mean diabetes duration 5.6 years, range 4–7 years) present with microvascular disease, macrovascular disease, or a combination of both. He listed four correlates for both micro- and macrovascular complications: (i) male gender; (ii) older age; (iii) smoking; and (iv) a history of hypoglycemia. He also emphasized that mean worldwide HbA1c for the T2D population is far above goal, and suggested that DISCOVER provides evidence for broad treatment inertia, given that people starting a second diabetes drug exhibited high HbA1c and frequent complications.
Company updates | |
---|---|
December 6, 2017: | Adocia (Paris, France) released topline data from the first head-to-head trial of ultra-rapid-acting insulins. Delivered via pumps to 42 patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D), Adocia's Phase 3-ready BioChaperone Lispro demonstrated significantly faster offset versus Novo Nordisk's (Copenhagen, Denmark) Fiasp (faster-acting insulin aspart), with a late time to half-maximum glucose infusion rate of 210 versus 228 min, respectively (18-min difference; P = 0.0017). Onset time was similar between the two insulins, with mean metabolic effect within the first hour of 162 versus 154 mg/kg for BioChaperone Lispro versus Fiasp, respectively (NS). Moreover, Adocia's candidate was superior to Novo Nordisk's NovoLog (insulin aspart) for both onset and offset time. Metabolic effect within the first hour was 63% higher with BioChaperone Lispro versus NovoLog (162 vs 99 mg/kg, respectively; P < 0.0001). Mean offset time was 232 min with NovoLog, significantly slower than the 210 min with BioChaperone Lispro (P = 0.002).Adocia will meet with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sometime next year to discuss a Phase 3 program for BioChaperone Lispro. The company may seek a dedicated partner before initiating Phase 3. |
December 7, 2017: | Zealand (Copenhagen, Denmark) announced the initiation of a Phase 3 pivotal trial for dasiglucagon, its potential first-in-class liquid-stable glucagon analog. The study is expected to complete in the second half of 2018. If results are positive, FDA submission is planned for 2019. The pivotal trial will evaluate the safety and efficacy of dasiglucagon administered as a single-dose hypoglycemia rescue treatment for people with T1D (n = 156). Participants will be randomized to the study drug, placebo, or currently marketed powder glucagon (which requires reconstitution), and a secondary endpoint will compare efficacy between dasiglucagon and currently marketed glucagon. Although Zealand plans on commercializing dasiglucagon in a rescue pen device, this study will use syringes. Zealand has indicated that prior to submitting a New Drug Application, the company will conduct either an additional Phase 3 trial using dasiglucagon in a rescue pen device or a small bridging study to show that the pen is as efficacious as a syringe. |
December 11, 2017: | Sanofi (Paris, France) announced full FDA approval of Admelog (biosimilar insulin lispro), the first-to-market biosimilar mealtime insulin in the US; Admelog is a biosimilar formulation of Lilly's (Indianapolis, IN, USA) Humalog. This regulatory decision follows the FDA's tentative approval of Admelog in September 2017 (indicating that the candidate had fulfilled all regulatory requirements but that it could not be launched until all patent disputes were settled), after which Lilly announced that it would not pursue a patent infringement lawsuit over Humalog. Sanofi's announcement did not include specific information about launch timing, but management has stated recently that Admelog will become available in the US sometime in 2018, even if it does not make an appreciable sales impact until 2019. |
December 15, 2017: | The Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) recommended Novo Nordisk's Ozempic (semaglutide), a once-weekly glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonist, for European Medicine Agency (EMA) approval. Final marketing authorization for Europe is anticipated in the first quarter of 2018. As part of European approval, Novo Nordisk has agreed to conduct post-market studies investigating the long-term effect of semaglutide on retinopathy. This requirement for approval is a reaction to the heightened retinopathy risk seen in SUSTAIN 6 (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–2.78),3 a premarket cardiovascular outcomes trial comparing semaglutide with placebo. Novo Nordisk's announcement further highlighted that the European label for Ozempic could include data on superior weight loss versus comparators and on improved renal outcomes, neither of which made it onto the US label; FDA approval for Ozempic came earlier in December 2017. |
December 18, 2017: | A paper detailing methods for the Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) trial4 was published in the American Journal of Nephrology. This study, expected to complete in June 2019, evaluates renal outcomes with Johnson & Johnson's (New Brunswick, NJ, USA) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor Invokana (canagliflozin) in patients with T2D and comorbid kidney disease. According to the paper, amputations in CREDENCE are being recorded as an adverse event of interest. Precise procedures for data collection were not clearly stipulated. Trial protocol recommends that patients stop treatment if they experience an amputation-related condition: critical limb ischemia was the one example given. As background, Invokana was associated with an increased risk for lower limb amputations in the Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Events in Type 2 Diabetes (CANVAS) trial5 and FDA has added a black box warning for amputations to all canagliflozin-containing medicines. |
December 21, 2017: | The FDA approved Merck (Kenilworth, NJ, USA) and Pfizer's (New York, NY, USA) SGLT2 inhibitor ertugliflozin for T2D under the brand name Steglatro. This positive decision comes on time with the expected fourth quarter of 2017, and it makes for a four-product SGLT2 inhibitor class: Steglatro joins Lilly and Boehringer Ingelheim's (Ingelheim, Germany) Jardiance (empagliflozin), Invokana (canagliflozin), and AstraZeneca's (Cambridge, UK) Farxiga (dapagliflozin). The FDA simultaneously approved Steglujan, a fixed-dose combination tablet of ertugliflozin with Merck's dipeptidyl peptidase (DPP)-4 inhibitor Januvia (sitagliptin) and Segluromet, a fixed-dose combination of ertugliflozin with metformin. All three products are slated for a US launch in the first quarter of 2018 (Steglatro and Steglujan in January, Segluromet in February). The combination of ertugliflozin and sitagliptin showed superior efficacy versus either monotherapy in VERTIS FACTORIAL6 and VERTIS SITA2.7 The list price for Steglatroin the US will be US$8.94/day (approximately US$268 for a 30-day supply of once-daily tablets), and the same is true for Segluromet. The list price for Steglujan will be US$17.45/day. |