The catalytic co-coupling of carbon monoxide and methyl nitrite to synthesize dimethyl oxalate (DMO) is a crucial step in the conversion of syngas to ethylene glycol. Recent advancements in numerical simulation methodologies substantially enhanced the potential for optimizing chemical production processes, thereby improving cost effectiveness and efficiency. Numerical simulation techniques were applied to model a shell-and-tube reactor and a radial reactor. The distributions of pressure, velocity, reaction, and temperature fields were analyzed for both reactor configurations under similar operating conditions. The findings indicate that the radial reactor has different advantages, including a smaller volume, a more uniform temperature distribution, and a lower pressure drop, highlighting its potential benefits in the DMO synthesis process.

References

1L. Zhao, et al., Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Oxalate Using Extruded Cu/SiO₂ Catalysts: Mechanical Strength and Catalytic Performance, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2012, 51 (43), 13935–13943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/ie300779a
10.1021/ie300779a
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
2C. Fan, et al., Reaction mechanism of methyl nitrite dissociation during co-catalytic coupling to dimethyl oxalate: A density functional theory study, Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2016, 24 (1), 132–139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2015.06.007
10.1016/j.cjche.2015.06.007
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
3R. Ye, et al., Perspectives on the Active Sites and Catalyst Design for the Hydrogenation of Dimethyl Oxalate, ACS Catal. 2020, 10 (8), 4465–4490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b05477
10.1021/acscatal.9b05477
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Z. Chi, et al., CO oxidative coupling with nitrite to oxalate over palladium catalyst: A comprehensive kinetic modeling, Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 446, 136656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.136656
10.1016/j.cej.2022.136656
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
5C. Wang, et al., Oxidative coupling of carbon monoxide to dimethyl oxalate: catalysts design, reaction mechanism and process intensification, Catal. Rev. 2024, 67 (2), 323–370. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2024.2320165
10.1080/01614940.2024.2320165
Web of Science® Google Scholar
6L. Yang, et al., Highly Effective Pd/MgO/-Al₂O₃ Catalysts for CO Oxidative Coupling to Dimethyl Oxalate: The Effect of MgO Coating on γ-Al₂O₃, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13 (24), 28064–28071. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c04051
10.1021/acsami.1c04051
CAS PubMed Google Scholar
7Z. Zhang, et al., Enhancing the activity of Pd/Zn-Al-O catalysts for esterification of CO to dimethyl oxalate via increasing oxygen defects by tuning the Zn/Al ratio, Catal. Sci. Technol. 2022, 12 (13), 4273–4280. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cy00369d
10.1039/d2cy00369d
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
8Z. Chi, et al., Reactor simulation and optimization for CO oxidative coupling to dimethyl oxalate reactions, CIESC J. 2022, 73 (11), 4974–4986.
CAS Google Scholar
9S. Chandra, et al., Design and modular scale-up of shell and tube metal hydride hydrogen storage reactor utilizing multipass water flow, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2024, 50, 1234–1252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.128
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2023.09.128
CAS Google Scholar
10F. Nalchifard, A. Sari, Thermal coupling of methanol steam reforming and hydrogen combustion to produce fuel cell hydrogen: A comparative theoretical study between membrane and hydrogen-recycled shell-and-tube reactors, Fuel 2024, 357, 129826. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129826
10.1016/j.fuel.2023.129826
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
11Y. Li, et al., Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation of CO₂ methanation in a shell-and-tube reactor with boiling water cooling, Adv. Powder Technol. 2024, 35 (11), 104671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apt.2024.104671
10.1016/j.apt.2024.104671
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
12J. Fang, et al., CFD simulations of Molten Salt Fast Reactor core cavity flows, Nucl. Eng. Des. 2024, 424, 113294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113294
10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113294
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
13Y. Lin, et al., CFD simulation of the Sabatier process in a shell-and-tube reactor under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions: Parameter sensitivity and reaction mechanism analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (34), 15254–15269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.029
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.029
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
14C. Hu, et al., A deep-learning model for predicting spatiotemporal evolution in reactive fluidized bed reactor, Renewable Energy 2024, 225, 120245. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120245
10.1016/j.renene.2024.120245
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
15S. Liu, et al., Porous-media model based particle-resolved simulation of a fixed bed with olefin catalytic cracking reaction, Powder Technol. 2024, 431, 119099. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119099
10.1016/j.powtec.2023.119099
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
16Z. Sun, et al., Numerical calculation of flow and reaction safety with different particle sizes in a fixed bed reactor for propene epoxidation with H₂ and O₂, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2023, 277, 118777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2023.118777
10.1016/j.ces.2023.118777
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
17Z. Guo, et al., Acetylene Hydrogenation Processes Studied Using CFD in a Packed Bed Reactor, Chem. Eng. Technol. 2024, 47 (10), 202300436. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202300436
10.1002/ceat.202300436
Web of Science® Google Scholar
18Q. Li, et al., An Analytical Formulation for Correcting the Relative Permeability of Gas-Water Flow in Propped Fractures Considering the Effect of Brinkman Flow, Water Resour. Res. 2024, 60 (11), e2023WR036625. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036625
10.1029/2023WR036625
Web of Science® Google Scholar
19L. Payne, J. Song, Spatial decay for a model of double diffusive convection in Darcy and Brinkman flows, Z. Angew. Math. Phys. 2000, 51 (6), 867–889. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00001527
10.1007/pl00001527
Web of Science® Google Scholar
20Y. Du, et al., Core-shell equivalent reactor network model to bridging CFD and process simulations of a fluidized bed reactor, Chem. Eng. Sci. 2024, 287, 119772. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2024.119772
10.1016/j.ces.2024.119772
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
21Q. Guo, et al., A CFD-DEM study of the solid-like and fluid-like states in the homogeneous fluidization regime of Geldart A particles, AIChE J. 2022, 68 (1), 17420. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.17420
10.1002/aic.17420
Web of Science® Google Scholar
22W. Wang, et al., Effect of fluid direction and reactor structure on heat storage performance of Ca(OH)₂/CaO based on shell-tube thermochemical energy storage device, Renewable Energy 2024, 234, 121249. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2024.121249
10.1016/j.renene.2024.121249
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
23Y. Lin, et al., CFD simulation of the Sabatier process in a shell-and-tube reactor under local thermal non-equilibrium conditions: Parameter sensitivity and reaction mechanism analysis, Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2022, 47 (34), 15254–15269. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.029
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2022.03.029
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
24M. Farsi, Mathematical Modeling and Optimization of a Radial Flow Tubular Reactor to Produce Methanol from Syngas, Pet. Chem. 2018, 58 (12), 1091–1098. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/s0965544118100043
10.1134/s0965544118100043
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar
25M. Farsi, DME production in multi-stage radial flow spherical membrane reactors: Reactor design and modeling, J. Nat. Gas Sci. Eng. 2014, 20, 366–372. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.009
10.1016/j.jngse.2014.07.009
CAS Web of Science® Google Scholar