International Organizations ICTs Policies: E-Democracy and E-Government for Political Development
Abstract
New technologies provide new channels of access to political information and participation in decision-making processes. This assumption is clearly important in the action plans and policies of International Organizations (World Bank, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, United Nations), which have assumed a leadership role in the reform of political institutions. Starting from an analysis of the reasons that have brought the state and processes of institution building back into focus, this paper will reconstruct the International Organizations' vision of the transformative potential of new information technologies and their activity in this field. Particular attention will be devoted to e-democracy and e-government as policies to build democracy in developing countries.
References
-
Alzouma, G. (2005). Myths of digital technology in Africa.
Global Media and Communication, 1(3), 339–356.
10.1177/1742766505058128 Google Scholar
-
Bass, J. (2005). Democracy, measures of. In
Encyclopedia of social measurement, 1, 637–643.
10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00567-3 Google Scholar
- Bebbington, A., Guggenhaim, S., Olson, E., & Woolcock, M. (2004). Exploring social capital debates at the World Bank. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(5), 33–64.
- Bertucci, G. (2003). Innovation in Government Around the World: Challenges and Perspectives. Fifth Global Forum on Reinventing Government Mexico City, Mexico, November 3–7.
- Bovard, T., & Loffler, E. (2003). Evaluer de la qualité de la gouvernance publique: indicateurs, modèles et méthodologies. La Revue internationale des Sciences administratives, 69(3), 363–381.
- Cassese, S., & Savino, M. (2005). The global economy, accountable governance, and administrative reform. Paper presented at the 6th Global Forum on Reinventing Government Towards Participatory and Transparent Governance, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Council of Europe. (2004). The future of democracy in Europe: Trends, analysis and reforms. Barcelona: Author.
- De Senarclens, P. (2004). Critique de la Mondialisation. Paris: Presses De Sciences Po.
- Emmerij, L. (2004). Labour mobility, transfer of financial resources and global inequalities: Comments on Keith Griffin. Development and Change, 35(3): 547–555.
-
Hamelink, C. J. (2004). Did WSIS achieve anything at all?
Gazette, 66(3–4), 281–290.
10.1177/0016549204043612 Google Scholar
-
Heeks, R. (2002). i-Development not e-development: Special issue on ICTS and development.
Journal of International Development, 14, 1–11.
10.1002/jid.861 Google Scholar
- Heeks, R. (2003). Most eGovernment-for-development projects fail: How can risks be reduced? Manchester: Institute for Development Policy and Management. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://idpm.man.ac.uk
- Heeks, R. (2004). eGovernment as a Carrier of Context. i-Government Working Papers Series, 15, 1–22.
- Hill, R. P., & Dhanda, K. K. (2003). Technological achievement and human development: A view from the United Nations development program. Human Rights Quarterly, 25(4), 1020–1034.
- Kakabadse, A., Kakabadse, N. K., & Kouzmin, A. (2003). Reinventing the democratic governance project through information technology? A growing agenda for debate. Public Administration Review, 63(1), 44–60.
- Kamark, E. (2004). Government innovation around the world. Research Working Papers Series, John F. Kennedy School of Government.
- Kim, P. S. (2005). Introduction: Challenges and opportunities for democracy, administration, and law. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 71(1), 99–108.
- Koïchiro, M. (2003). Cyberspace, democracy and development. A contribution to the open democracy online debate more. Retrieved June 25, 2007, from http://www.opendemocracy.net/debates/article-8-85-915.jsp
- McMichael, P. H. (2004). Development and social change. A global perspective. London: Sage.
- Mosco, V. (2004). The digital sublime: Myth, power, and cyberspace. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
- Nagy Hanna, K. (2003). Why national strategies are needed for ICT-enabled development. ISG staff working papers, June.
-
Nulens, G., & Van Audenhove, L. (1999). An information society in Africa? An analysis of the information society of the World Bank, ITU, and ECE.
Gazette, 61(6), 451–471.
10.1177/0016549299061006001 Google Scholar
- OECD. (2001). Citizens as partners. Handbook on information, consultation and public participation in policy-making. Paris: Author.
- OECD. (2003). Checklist for e-government leaders. OECD Observer Policy Brief, September.
-
Price, M. E. (2002). Media and sovereignty: The global information revolution and its challenge to state power. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/4533.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Putzel, J. (2005). Globalization, liberalization, and prospects for the state. International Political Science Review, 26(1), 5–16.
- Rondinelli, D. A., & Shabbir, C. G. (2003). Reinventing government for the twenty-first century: State Capacity in a globalizing society. Bloomfield CT: Kumarian Press.
-
Schech, S. (2002). Wired for change: The links between ICTs and development discourses.
Journal of International Development, 14, 13–23.
10.1002/jid.870 Google Scholar
- Tipson, F., and Frittelli, C. (2003). Global digital opportunities: National strategies of “ICT for development.” New York: The Markle Foundation.
- UN. (2001). World public sector report 2000: Globalization and the state Publication No. ST/ESA/PAD/SER.26. New York: Author.
- UN. (2003). World public sector report 2003: E-government at the crossroads. Publication No. ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/49. New York: Author.
- UN. (2004). UN global e-government readiness report 2004: Toward access for opportunity. Publication No. UNPAN/2004/11. New York: Author.
- UN. (2005a). Global e-government readiness report 2005: From e-government to e-inclusion (Publication No. UNPAN2005/14). New York: Author.
- UN. (2005b). World public sector report 2005: Unlocking the human potential for public sector performance (Publication No. ST/ESA/PAD/SER.E/63). New York: Author.
- Wade, R. H. (2002). Bridging the digital divide: New route to development or new form of dependency? Global Governance, 8, 443–466.
- Wade, R. H. (2003). What strategies are viable for developing countries today? The World Trade Organization and the shrinking of “development space. Review of International Political Economy, 4, 621–644.
- Wade, R. H. (2005). Failing states and cumulative causation in the world system. International Political Science Review, 26(1), 17–36.
- Waller, P., Livesey, P., & Edin, K. (2001). E-government in the service of democracy. ICA Information No. 74, General Issues, June.
- Whitehead, L. (2004). Significant recent developments in the field of democratization. In D. Berg-Sclosser (Ed.), Democratization: The state of art (pp. 32–52). Wiesbaden, Germany: VS Verlag fur Sozialwissenschaften.
- World Bank. (1997). World development report 1997: The state in a changing world. Washington, DC: World Bank.
- World Bank. (2002a). The e-government handbook for developing countries. InfoDev. Information For Development Program. Washington, D.C.: Author.
- World Bank. (2002b). Information and communication technologies. A world bank group strategy. Washington, D.C.: Author.