Volume 27, Issue 3 pp. 254-262

Treatment-emergent CNS symptoms following triptan therapy are part of the attack

PJ Goadsby

Corresponding Author

PJ Goadsby

Institute of Neurology, London, UK,

Professor P. J. Goadsby, Institute of Neurology, Queen Square, London WC1N 3BG, UK. Tel. + 44 20 7829 8749, fax + 44 20 7813 0349, e-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
DW Dodick

DW Dodick

Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ and

Search for more papers by this author
M Almas

M Almas

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA,

Search for more papers by this author
H-C Diener

H-C Diener

Department of Neurology, University Duisburg-Essen, Germany,

Search for more papers by this author
P Tfelt-Hansen

P Tfelt-Hansen

Department of Neurology, Glostrup Hospital, Glostrup, Denmark and

Search for more papers by this author
RB Lipton

RB Lipton

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, New York, NY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
B Parsons

B Parsons

Pfizer Inc, New York, NY, USA,

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 March 2007
Citations: 10

Abstract

If treatment-emergent central nervous system (CNS) symptoms following triptan therapy represent direct pharmacological effects of the drug, they should occur independent of response to active drug. However, if they represent unmasking of neurological symptoms of the migraine attack after pain is relieved, they should be more common in responders both to active drug and to placebo. To explore this issue, we evaluated the relationship between the CNS adverse events and treatment response following triptan or placebo treatment. We used pooled data from seven double-blind, placebo-controlled trials involving eletriptan 20 mg (E20, n = 402), eletriptan 40 mg (E40, n = 1870), eletriptan 80 mg (E80, n = 1393), sumatriptan 100 mg (S100, n = 275) and placebo (Pbo, n = 1024). Somnolence was more prevalent among 2 h headache responders than non-responders for all treatments, including E80 (8.8% vs. 5.0%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.4% vs. 5.0%; NS), E20 (4.0% vs. 2.0%; NS), S100 (4.7% vs. 3.2%; NS) and Pbo (7.6% vs. 3.0%; P < 0.05). Similarly, the incidence of asthenia was higher among patients who responded to treatment compared with those who did not respond to E80 (15.2% vs. 7.8%; P < 0.05), E40 (6.5% vs. 3.6%; P < 0.05), E20 (6.5% vs. 1.0%; P < 0.05), S100 (10.1% vs. 4.7%; NS) and Pbo (4.4% vs. 2.7%; NS). The generally higher rates of somnolence and asthenia in patients who respond to treatment suggests that these treatment-emergent neurological symptoms may represent the unmasking of CNS symptoms associated with the natural resolution of a migraine attack, rather than simply representing drug-related side-effects. The rate of somnolence in placebo responders is comparable to that in responders to E40 and E80, indicating that somnolence is related, at least in some important part, to headache relief and not treatment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.