Volume 14, Issue 3 pp. 341-342

Patent foramen ovale management: who should do what?

G. Rigatelli

G. Rigatelli

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
P. Cardaioli

P. Cardaioli

Interventional Cardiology Unit, Division of Cardiology, Rovigo General Hospital, Rovigo, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 February 2007
Citations: 5
Gianluca Rigatelli, Endo Cardio Vascular Therapy Research, Via WA Mozart, 9, 37040 Legnago, Verona, Italy (tel.: +3903471912016; fax: +39044220164; e-mail: [email protected]).

Abstract

Although definitive evidence of effectiveness of percutaneous patent foramen ovale (PFO) closure is still debated and closure seems to be recommendable only for secondary prevention of stroke, many different specialists may be involved in diagnosis and treatment of the different PFO-related syndromes. When many different professionals are involved in the same patient management, confusion about who does make the diagnosis and who does take decision about medical or interventional therapy would be frequent and correct judgment and actions would be delayed. The authors propose a model of multidisciplinary protocol to manage PFO-related syndrome, in which each specialists has a specific role during the decision-making process that is driven by the cardiologist.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.