Volume 8, Issue 4 pp. 278-283

Stress-induced blood pressure elevation in subjects with mild cognitive impairment: Effects of the dual-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine

Yumiko Kawashima

Yumiko Kawashima

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, and

Search for more papers by this author
Masahiro Akishita

Masahiro Akishita

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Search for more papers by this author
Hiroshi Hasegawa

Hiroshi Hasegawa

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, and

Search for more papers by this author
Koichi Kozaki

Koichi Kozaki

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, and

Search for more papers by this author
Kenji Toba

Kenji Toba

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Kyorin University School of Medicine, Mitaka, and

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 November 2008
Citations: 5
Dr Masahiro Akishita MD PhD, Department of Geriatric Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8655, Japan. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim:  We investigated whether mental stress-induced blood pressure elevation was related to cognitive function in the elderly, and further examined the effects of the dual-type calcium channel blocker, cilnidipine, on stress induced hypertension in subjects with mild cognitive impairment.

Methods:  In study I, 39 consecutive outpatients (mean age ± standard deviation, 77 ± 8 years), who were referred to our memory clinic and were not taking any medications, were studied. They were divided into three groups according to cognitive function on the Hasegawa Dementia Scale-Revised (HDSR): group 1 (n = 8), 28 points or more; group 2 (n = 18), 21–27 points; and group 3 (n = 13), 20 points or less. In study II, 14 outpatients with hypertension and mild cognitive impairment (aged 79 ± 8 years; HDSR score, 24 ± 4) were assigned to receive cilnidipine (10–20 mg/day). The control group (n = 10) matched for age, HDSR and blood pressure was followed without cilnidipine.

Results:  In study I, although age and basal blood pressure were similar among the three groups, the blood pressure response to a mental arithmetic test was twice as large in group 2 (26 ± 12 mmHg in systolic pressure and 11 ± 8 mmHg in diastolic pressure) as those in groups 1 and 3. In study II, after 4 weeks, cilnidipine treatment significantly decreased the blood pressure responses to the mental arithmetic test compared to the baseline as well as to those of the control group.

Conclusions:  Stress-induced blood pressure elevations are exaggerated in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. Cilnidipine may have inhibitory effects on stress-induced hypertension.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.