Volume 60, Issue 7 pp. 1060-1072

Mucinous differentiation in colorectal cancer – indicator of poor prognosis?

Cord Langner

Cord Langner

Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz

Search for more papers by this author
Lars Harbaum

Lars Harbaum

Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz

Search for more papers by this author
Marion J Pollheimer

Marion J Pollheimer

Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Kornprat

Peter Kornprat

Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Graz, Graz

Search for more papers by this author
Richard A Lindtner

Richard A Lindtner

Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Graz

Search for more papers by this author
Andrea Schlemmer

Andrea Schlemmer

Institute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Vieth

Michael Vieth

Institute of Pathology, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Rehak

Peter Rehak

Department of Surgery, Research Unit for Biomedical Engineering and Computing, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 February 2012
Citations: 46
C Langner MD, Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 25, A-8036 Graz, Austria. e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Langner C, Harbaum L, Pollheimer M J, Kornprat P, Lindtner R A, Schlemmer A, Vieth M & Rehak P
(2012) Histopathology 60, 1060–1072

Mucinous differentiation in colorectal cancer – indicator of poor prognosis?

Aims: To analyse the prognostic impact of mucinous differentiation in colorectal mucinous adenocarcinomas and adenocarcinomas with a mucinous component.

Methods and results: A total of 381 tumours were reviewed for mucinous differentiation by two independent pathologists. Mismatch repair status was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Prognostic significance was assessed by univariate and multivariate analyses. Eighty-one (21%) tumours were Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) Stage I, 120 (31%) Stage II, 126 (33%) Stage III and 54 (14%) Stage IV. Mucinous adenocarcinomas accounted for 12% and adenocarcinomas with a mucinous component for 19% of tumours. Mucinous differentiation was associated significantly with mismatch repair protein deficiency. The presence of extracellular mucin, regardless of extent, did not affect patients’ outcome, while tumour grade, vascular and perineural invasion, tumour border configuration and budding were associated significantly with outcome. Cox analysis proved venous invasion to be an independent predictor of outcome in mucinous adenocarcinomas and both venous invasion and tumour budding as independent predictors of outcome in adenocarcinomas with any amount of mucin.

Conclusions: Mucinous adenocarcinomas and/or adenocarcinomas with mucinous component do not differ from conventional adenocarcinomas with respect to prognosis and histological predictors of outcome. Hence, recording of mucinous differentiation may be used as an indicator of mismatch repair deficiency, but not for prognostic stratification.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.