An update on Italian Stroke Organization guidelines on carotid endarterectomy and stenting
Corresponding Author
Gaetano Lanza
Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
Correspondence: Gaetano Lanza, Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Viale Piemonte 70, 21053 Castellanza, Italy.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorStefano Ricci
Department of Neurology, ASL 1, Città di Castello e Branca, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCarlo Setacci
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPatrizio Castelli
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorClaudio Novalil
Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCarlo Pratesi
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Speziale
Vascular Surgery Department, Policlinico Umberto I, ‘La Sapienza’ University, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlberto Cremonesi
Department of Medical and Surgical Cardiology, Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorErnesto Morlacchi
Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorJessica Lanza
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Santalucia
Scientific Direction and Emergency Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAugusto Zaninelli
School of Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGian Franco Gensini
Department of Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Gaetano Lanza
Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
Correspondence: Gaetano Lanza, Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Viale Piemonte 70, 21053 Castellanza, Italy.
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorStefano Ricci
Department of Neurology, ASL 1, Città di Castello e Branca, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCarlo Setacci
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, University of Siena, Siena, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPatrizio Castelli
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorClaudio Novalil
Department of Vascular Surgery, S. Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorCarlo Pratesi
Department of Vascular Surgery, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorFrancesco Speziale
Vascular Surgery Department, Policlinico Umberto I, ‘La Sapienza’ University, Rome, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAlberto Cremonesi
Department of Medical and Surgical Cardiology, Cecilia Hospital, Cotignola, Ravenna, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorErnesto Morlacchi
Department of Vascular Surgery, IRCCS MultiMedica Hospital, Castellanza, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorJessica Lanza
Vascular Endovascular Surgery Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorPaola Santalucia
Scientific Direction and Emergency Medicine Department, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAugusto Zaninelli
School of Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorGian Franco Gensini
Department of Critical Care, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
One hundred and fifty-three authors, 45 Italian scientific societies, and two Italian patients’ associations participated in drafting the Italian Stroke Organization document, which has become the national guideline for the prevention and treatment of stroke in Italy. For the surgical therapy section of the Italian Stroke Organization document, the main trials on carotid endoarterectomy and stenting were critically reviewed in order to formulate recommendations for these procedures. Recommendations are presented here for the referral of patients to either carotid endarterectomy or stenting on the basis of whether carotid stenosis is symptomatic or asymptomatic.
References
- 1 Setacci C, Lanza G, Ricci S et al. SPREAD Italian guidelines for stroke. Indication for carotid endarterectomy and stenting. J Cardiovasc Surg 2009; 50: 171–182.
- 2 Hankey G, Hart RG, Levine SR et al. National Stroke Association Guidelines for the management of transient ischemic attacks. Ann Neurol 2006; 60: 301–313.
- 3 Scottish Intercollegiate Guideline Network. SIGN 50: a guideline developers’ handbook. SIGN Publication No. 50 [published 2001 February; last updated 2004 May]. Available at http://www.sign.ac.uk (accessed 5 March 2009).
- 4 Phillips B, Ball C, Sackett D et al. Oxford centre for evidence-based medicine levels of evidence (May 2001). Available at http://www.cebm.net/?o=1025. (accessed 31 March 2009).
- 5 North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445–453.
- 6 European Carotid Surgery Trialists’ Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe or mild carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235–1243.
- 7 Alamowitch S, Eliasziw M, Algra A et al. NASCET group. Risk, causes and prevention of ischaemic stroke in elderly patients with symptomatic internal carotid stenosis. Lancet 2001; 357: 1154–1160.
- 8 Cina CS, Clase CM, Haynes RB. Carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000; (2):CD001081.
- 9 Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA et al. Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists’ Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003; 361: 107–116.
- 10 Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Temporal trends in the risk of stroke and death due to endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: an updated systematic review. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2009; 37: 504–511.
- 11 Rothwell P. Carotid endarterectomy and prevention of stroke in the very elderly. Lancet 2001; 357: 1142–1143.
- 12 Fairhead JF, Rothwell PM. Underinvestigation and undertreatment of carotid disease in elderly patients with TIA and stroke: comparative population based study. BMJ 2006; 333: 525–527.
- 13 Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Benavente OR. The risk of stroke in patients with first-ever retinal vs hemispheric transient ischemic attacks and high-grade carotid stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Arch Neurol 1995; 52: 246–249.
- 14 Rothwell PM, Warlow CP. Prediction of benefit from carotid endarterectomy in individual patients: a risk-modelling study. Lancet 1999; 353: 2105–2110.
- 15 Mead GE, Lewis SC, Wardlaw M, Dermis MS, Warlow CP. Severe ipsilateral carotid stenosis and middle cerebral artery disease in lacunar ischaemic stroke: innocent bystanders? Neurol 2002; 249: 266–271.
- 16 Streifler JY, Eliasziw M, Benavente O et al. NASCET Group. Prognostic importance of leukoaraiosis in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 2002; 33: 1651–1655.
- 17 Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA, Warlow CP, Barnett HJ. Endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis in relation to clinical subgroups and timing of surgery. Lancet 2004; 363: 915–924.
- 18 Coull AJ, Lovett JK, Rothwell PM. Population based study of early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: implications for public education and organisation of services. BMJ 2004; 328: 326–329.
- 19 Rothwell PM. Transient ischaemic attacks: time to wake up. Heart 2007; 93: 893–894.
- 20 Fairhead JF, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Population-based study of delays in carotid imaging and surgery and the risk of recurrent stroke. Neurology 2005; 65: 371–375.
- 21 Blaser T, Hofmann K, Buerger T. Risk of stroke, transient ischaemic attack, and vessel occlusion before endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. Stroke 2002; 33: 1057–1062.
- 22 Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Systematic review of the operative risks of carotid endareterectomy for recently symptomatic stenosis in relation to the timing of surgery. Stroke 2009; 40: 564–572.
- 23 Investigators of the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Clinical advisory: carotid endarterectomy for patients with asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1994; 25: 2523–2524.
- 24 Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273: 1421–1428.
- 25 Gorelick PB, Sacco RL, Smith DB et al. Prevention of a first stroke. A review of guidelines and a multidiscplinary consensus statement from the national stroke association. JAMA 1999; 81: 1112–1120.
- 26 Benavente O, Moher D, Pham B. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a meta-analysis. BMJ 1998; 317: 1477–1480.
- 27 Chambers BR, Donnan GA. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4):CDOO1923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CDOOI923.pub2.
- 28 Barnen HJM, Meldrum HE, Eliasziw M. The dilemma of surgical treatment for patients with asymptomatic carotid disease. Ann Intern Med 1995; 123: 723–725.
- 29 Frey JL. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: surgery's the answer, but that's not the question. Ann Neurol 1996; 39: 405–406.
- 30 Thomas DJ. The asymptomatic carotid surgery trial: a neurologist's view; in LR Caplan, EG Shiflin, AN Nicolaides, WS Moore (eds): Cerebrovascular Ischaemia: Investigation and Management. Nicosia, Cyprus, Med-Orion Publishing Co, 1996: 411–421.
- 31 Nicolaides AN. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis: the ‘doctors dilemma’. Int Angiol 1995; 14: 1–4.
- 32 Mayberg MR, Winn HR. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Resolving the controversy. JAMA 1995; 273: 1459–1461.
- 33 Inzitari D, Eliasziw M, Gates P, Sharpe BL, Chan RK, Meldrum HE. The causes and risk of stroke in patients with asymptomatic internal-carotid-artery stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1693–1700.
- 34 MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomized controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491–1502.
- 35 Rothwell PM. ACST: which subgroups will benefit most from carotid endarterectomy? Lancet 2004; 364: 1122–1123.
- 36 Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E et al. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 1074–1084.
- 37 Nicolaides AN. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis and risk of stroke. Identification of a high risk group (ACSRS). Int Angiol 1995; 14: 21–23.
- 38 Harward TR, Kroener JM, Wickbom IG, Bernstein EF. Natural history of asymptomatic ulcerative plaques of the carotid biforcation. Am J Surg 1983; 146: 208–212.
- 39 Nadareishvili Z, Rothwell P, Beletsky V, Pagniello A, Norris W. Long-term risk of stroke and other vascular events in patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Arch Neurol 2002; 59: 1162–1166.
- 40 Spence JD. Effects of intensive medical therapy on microemboli and cardiovascular risk in asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Arch Neurol 2010; 67: 180–186.
- 41 Abbott AL. Medical (nonsurgical) intervention alone is now best for prevention of stroke associated with asymptomatic severe carotid stenosis: results of a systematic review and analysis. Stroke 2009; 40: 573–583.
- 42 Abbott A Adelman MA, Alexandrov AV et al. Why calls for routine carotid stenting are currently inappropriate. Stroke 2013; 44: 1186–1190.
- 43 Schneider PA, Naylor AR. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis – medical therapy alone versus medical therapy plus carotid endarterectomy or stenting. J Vasc Surg 2010; 52: 499–507.
- 44 Health and Public Policy Committee American College of Physicians. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Ann Intern Med 1983; 99: 864–869.
- 45 Beebe H, Archie J, Baker W, Barnes R, Becker G, Bernstein E. Concern about safety of carotid angioplasty. Stroke 1996; 27: 197–198.
- 46 Alberts MJ. Results of a multicenter prospective randomized trial of carotid artery stenting vs carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2001; 32: 325.
- 47 Naylor AR, Bolia A, Abbott RJ, Pye IF, Smith J, Lennard N. Randomized study of carotid angioplasty and stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: a stopped trial. J Vasc Surg 1998; 28: 326–334.
- 48 CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular versus surgical treatment in patients with carotid stenosis in the Carotid and vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): a randomised trial. Lancet 2001; 357: 1729–1737.
- 49 Bonati LH, Ederle J, McCabe DJ et al.; CAVATAS Investigators. Long-term risk of carotid restenosis in patients randomly assigned to endovascular treatment or endarterectomy in the Carotid and Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 908–917.
- 50 Ederle J, Bonati L, Dobson J et al.; CAVATAS Investigators. Endovascular treatment with angioplasty or stenting versus endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis in the Carotid And Vertebral Artery Transluminal Angioplasty Study (CAVATAS): long-term follow-up of a randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 898–907.
- 51 Ederle J, Dobson J, Featherstone RL et al. Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. International Carotid Stenting Study investigators. Lancet 2010; 375: 985–997.
- 52 Bonati LH, Jongen LM, Haller S et al. for the ICSS-MRI study group. New ischaemic brain lesions on MRI after stenting or andarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis: a substudy of the International Carotid Stenting Study. Lancet Neurol 2010; 9: 353–362.
- 53 Rothwell PM. Carotid stenting: more risky than endarterectomy and often no better than medical treatment alone. Lancet 2010; 375: 957–958.
- 54 Yadav JS, Wholey MH, Kuntz RE et al.; SAPPHIRE Investigators. Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1493–1501.
- 55 Cambria RP. Stenting for carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2004; 351: 1565–1567.
- 56 Gurm HS, Yadav JS, Fayad P, Katzen BT, Mishkel G, Bajwa TK; SAPPHIRE Investigators. Long-term results of carotid stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 1572–1579.
- 57 Coward LJ, Featherstone RL, Brown M. Safety and efficacy of endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis compared with carotid endarterectomy. A Cochrane systematic review of the randomized evidence. Stroke 2005; 36: 905–911.
- 58 Ederle J, Featherstone RL, Brown MM. Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (4):CD000515. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000515.pub3.
- 59 Narins CR, Illig KA. Patient selection for carotid stenting versus endarterectomy: a systematic review. J Vasc Surg 2006; 44: 661–672.
- 60 Connors J, Sacks D, Furlan A, Selamn W, Russel E, Stieg P. Training, competency, and credentialing standards for diagnostic cervicocerebral angiography, carotid stenting, and cerebrovascular intervention. Neurology 2005; 64: 190–198.
- 61 Cremonesi A, Setacci C, Bignamini A et al. Carotid artery stenting. First consensus document of the ICCS-SPREAD Joint Committee. Stroke 2006; 37: 2400–2409.
- 62 Mas JL, Chatellier G, Beyssen B, Branchereau A, MouJin T, Becquemin JP, EVA-3S Investigators. Endarterectomy versus stenting in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 1660–1671.
- 63 SPACE Collaborative Group, Ringleb PA, Allenberg J, Bruckmann H, Eckstein HR, Fraedrich G. 30 day results from the SPACE trial of stent-protected angioplasty versus carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients: a randomised non inferiority trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 1239–1247.
- 64 Setacci C, Cremonesi A. SPACE and EVA-3S: the need of standards for carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2007; 33: 48–49.
- 65 Rothwell PM. Poor outcomes after endovascular treatment of symptomatic carotid stenosis: time for a moratorium. Lancet Neurol 2009; 8: 871–873.
- 66 Sidawy AN, Zwolak RM, White R, Siami F, Schermerhorn M, Sicard G. Risk-adjusted 30-day outcomes of carotid stenting and endarterectomy: results from the SVS Vascular Registry. J Vasc Surg 2009; 49: 71–79.
- 67 Brott TG, Hobson RW 2nd, Howard G et al.; CREST Investigators. Stenting versus endarterectomy for treatment of carotid-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 11–23.
- 68 Naylor AR. Riding on the CREST of a wave. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39: 523–526.
- 69 Setacci C, De Rango P. A light in the shadows in the carotid stenting. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2010; 39: 527–528.
- 70 Setacci C, Chisci E, Setacci F, Iacoponi F, De Donato G, Rossi A. Siena carotid artery score. Stroke 2010; 41: 1259–1265.
- 71 Wimmer NJ, Yeh R, Cutlip DE, Mauri L. Risk prediction for adverse events after carotid artery stenting in higher surgical risk patients. Stroke 2012; 43: 3218–3224.
- 72 White CJ. Carotid artery stent placement. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2010; 3: 467–474.
- 73 Hobson RW 2nd, Howard VJ, Roubin GS et al.; CREST Investigators. Carotid artery stenting is associated with increased complications in octogenarians: 30-day stroke and death rates in the CREST lead-in phase. J Vasc Surg 2004; 40: 1106–1111.
- 74 White CJ, Iyer SS, Hopkins LN, Katzen BT, Russell ME; BEACH Trial Investigators. Carotid stenting with distal protection in high surgical risk patients: the BEACH trial 30 day results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 67: 503–512.
- 75 Gray WA, Yadav JS, Verta P et al.; CAPTURE Trial Collaborators. The CAPTURE registry: predictors of outcomes in carotid artery stenting with embolic protection for high surgical risk patients in the early post-approval setting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 70: 1025–1033.
- 76 Roubin GS, Iyer S, Halkin A, Vitek J, Brennan C. Realizing the potential of carotid artery stenting: proposed paradigms for patient selection and procedural technique. Circulation 2006; 113: 2021–2030.
- 77 Longmore RB, Yeh RW, Kennedy KF et al. Clinical referral patterns for carotid artery stenting versus carotid endarterectomy: results from the Carotid Artery Revascularization and Endarterectomy Registry. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2011; 4: 88–94.
- 78 Nallamothu BK, Gurm HS, Ting HH et al. Operator experience and carotid stenting outcomes in medicare beneficiaries. JAMA 2011; 306: 1338–1343.
- 79 Murad MH, Shahrour A, Shah ND, Montori VM, Ricotta JJ. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials of carotid endarterectomy vs stenting. J Vasc Surg 2011; 53: 792–797.
- 80 Bonati LH, Lyrer P, Ederle J, Featherstone R, Brown M. Percutaneous transluminal balloon angioplasty and stenting for carotid artery stenosis (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 9:CD000515.
- 81 Paraskevas KI, Mikhailidis DP, Veith FJ. Comparison of the five 2011 guidelines for the treatment of carotid stenosis. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55: 1504–1508.