Endometriosis-related pathology: a discussion of selected uncommon benign, premalignant and malignant lesions
Corresponding Author
W Glenn McCluggage
Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
Address for correspondence: W G McCluggage, Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
W Glenn McCluggage
Department of Pathology, Belfast Health and Social Care Trust, Belfast, UK
Address for correspondence: W G McCluggage, Department of Pathology, Royal Group of Hospitals Trust, Grosvenor Road, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK. e-mail: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Endometriosis is an extremely common condition and, in most cases, establishing a histological diagnosis is straightforward, although a variety of benign alterations may result in problems with interpretation. In this review, I discuss selected uncommon variants of endometriosis or benign alterations that may result in diagnostic problems. The topics covered include the contentious issue of so-called atypical endometriosis, stromal endometriosis, polypoid endometriosis, and the association of endometriosis with florid mesothelial hyperplasia. The propensity of endometriosis to undergo neoplastic transformation (especially to endometrioid and clear cell carcinoma) is well known. Selected issues relating to the various neoplasms that can arise in endometriosis are discussed, with a particular concentration on unusual variants of endometrioid carcinoma that result in a disproportionately high number of issues in referral practice. The propensity of ovarian endometrioid carcinomas to show an unexpected (‘aberrant’) immunophenotype with positive staining with ‘intestinal’ markers and negative staining with Mullerian markers is also discussed. Uncommon tumour types that may arise in endometriosis, namely seromucinous neoplasms, mesonephric-like carcinomas, and somatically derived yolk sac tumours, are also covered.
References
- 1Giudice LC. Endometriosis. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010; 362; 2389–2398.
- 2Vercellini P, Vigano P, Somigliana E, Fedele L. Endometriosis: pathogenesis and treatment. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 2014; 10; 261–275.
- 3Adamson GD, Kennedy SH, Hummelshoj L. Creating solutions in endometriosis: global collaboration through the World Endometriosis Research Foundation. J. Endometriosis 2010; 2; 3–6.
10.1177/228402651000200102 Google Scholar
- 4Clement PB. The pathology of endometriosis: a survey of the many faces of a common disease emphasizing diagnostic pitfalls and unusual and newly appreciated aspects. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2007; 14; 241–260.
- 5Clement PB, Young RH. Two previously unemphasized features of endometriosis: micronodular stromal endometriosis and endometriosis with stromal elastosis. Int. J. Surg. Pathol. 2000; 8; 223–227.
- 6Houghton O, McCluggage WG. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of endometriosis: a condition characterized by a plethora of unusual histological features. Diagn. Histopathol. 2011; 17; 193–202.
10.1016/j.mpdhp.2011.01.001 Google Scholar
- 7Matias-Guiu X, Stewart CJR. Endometriosis-associated ovarian neoplasia. Pathology 2018; 50; 190–204.
- 8Boyle DP, McCluggage WG. Peritoneal stromal endometriosis: a detailed morphological analysis of a large series of cases of a common and under-recognised form of endometriosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2009; 62; 530–533.
- 9Clement PB, Young RH, Scully RE. Stromal endometriosis of the uterine cervix. A variant of endometriosis that may simulate a sarcoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1990; 14; 449–455.
- 10Sumathi VP, McCluggage WG. CD10 is useful in demonstrating endometrial stroma at ectopic sites and in confirming a diagnosis of endometriosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2002; 55; 391–392.
- 11Groisman GM, Meir A. CD10 is helpful in detecting occult or inconspicuous endometrial stromal cells in cases of presumptive endometriosis. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2003; 127; 1003–1006.
- 12Kennedy MM, Biddolph S, Lucas SB et al. Cyclin D1 expression and HHV8 in Kaposi sarcoma. J. Clin. Pathol. 1999; 52; 569–573.
- 13Young RH, Prat J, Scully RE. Endometrioid stromal sarcomas of the ovary. A clinicopathologic analysis of 23 cases. Cancer 1984; 53; 1143–1155.
10.1002/1097-0142(19840301)53:5<1143::AID-CNCR2820530521>3.0.CO;2-F CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 14Clement PB, Young RH. Florid mesothelial hyperplasia associated with ovarian tumors: a potential source of error in tumor diagnosis and staging. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1993; 12; 51–58.
- 15Oparka R, McCluggage WG, Herrington CS. Peritoneal mesothelial hyperplasia associated with gynaecologic disease: a potential diagnostic pitfall that is commonly associated with endometriosis. J. Clin. Pathol. 2011; 64; 313–318.
- 16Attanoos RL, Webb R, Dojcinov SD, Gibbs AR. Value of mesothelial and epithelial antibodies in distinguishing diffuse peritoneal mesothelioma in females from serous papillary carcinoma of the ovary and peritoneum. Histopathology 2002; 40; 237–244.
- 17Ordóñez NG. Value of PAX8, PAX2, claudin-4, and h-caldesmon immunostaining in distinguishing peritoneal epithelioid mesotheliomas from serous carcinomas. Mod. Pathol. 2013; 26; 553–562.
- 18Chapel DB, Husain AN, Krausz T, McGregor SM. PAX8 expression in a subset of malignant peritoneal mesotheliomas and benign mesothelium has diagnostic implications in the differential diagnosis of ovarian serous carcinoma. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 1675–1682.
- 19Tandon RT, Jimenez-Cortez Y, Taub R, Borczuk AC. Immunohistochemistry in peritoneal mesothelioma: a single-center experience of 244 cases. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2018; 142; 236–242.
- 20LaGrenade A, Silverberg SG. Ovarian tumors associated with atypical endometriosis. Hum. Pathol. 1988; 19; 1080–1084.
- 21Seidman JD. Prognostic importance of hyperplasia and atypia in endometriosis. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1996; 15; 1–9.
- 22Czernobilsky B, Morris WJ. A histologic study of ovarian endometriosis with emphasis on hyperplastic and atypical changes. Obstet. Gynecol. 1979; 53; 318–323.
- 23Fukunaga M, Nomura K, Ishikawa E, Ushigome S. Ovarian atypical endometriosis: its close association with malignant epithelial tumours. Histopathology 1997; 30; 249–255.
- 24Parker RL, Dadmanesh F, Young RH, Clement PB. Polypoid endometriosis: a clinicopathologic analysis of 24 cases and a review of the literature. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004; 28; 285–297.
- 25Ferraro LR, Hetz H, Carter H. Malignant endometriosis; pelvic endometriosis complicated by polypoid endometrioma of the colon and endometriotic sarcoma; report of a case and review of the literature. Obstet. Gynecol. 1956; 7; 32–39.
- 26Eichhorn JH, Young RH, Clement PB, Scully RE. Mesodermal (Mullerian) adenosarcoma of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 40 cases and a review of the literature. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2002; 26; 1243–1258.
- 27Sampson JA. Endometrial carcinoma of the ovary, arising in endometrial tissue in that organ. Arch. Surg. 1925; 10; 1–72.
- 28Taniguchi F. New knowledge and insights about the malignant transformation of endometriosis. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2017; 43; 1093–1100.
- 29Wilbur MA, Shih IM, Segars JH, Fader AN. Cancer implications for patients with endometriosis. Semin. Reprod. Med. 2017; 35; 110–116.
- 30Clement PB, Young RH. Endometrioid carcinoma of the uterine corpus: a review of its pathology with emphasis on recent advances and problematic aspects. Adv. Anat. Pathol. 2002; 9; 145–184.
- 31Kobel M, Kalloger SE, Baker PM et al. Diagnosis of ovarian carcinoma cell type is highly reproducible: a transcanadian study. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2010; 34; 984–993.
- 32Kobel M, Bak J, Bertelsen BI et al. Ovarian carcinoma histotype determination is highly reproducible, and is improved through the use of immunohistochemistry. Histopathology 2014; 64; 1004–1013.
- 33Al-Hussaini M, Stockman A, Foster H, McCluggage WG. WT-1 assists in distinguishing ovarian from uterine serous carcinoma and in distinguishing between serous and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Histopathology 2004; 44; 109–115.
- 34McCluggage WG. WT1 is of value in ascertaining the site of origin of serous carcinomas within the female genital tract. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2004; 23; 97–99.
- 35Shimizu M, Toki T, Takagi Y, Konishi I, Fujii S. Immunohistochemical detection of the Wilms’ tumor gene (WT1) in epithelial ovarian tumors. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2000; 19; 158–163.
- 36Silva EG, Young RH. Endometrioid neoplasms with clear cells: a report of 21 cases in which the alteration is not of typical secretory type. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 1203–1208. Erratum in: Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 1628.
- 37Fadare O, Zhao C, Khabele D et al. Comparative analysis of Napsin A, alpha-methylacyl-coenzyme A racemase (AMACR, P504S), and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1 beta as diagnostic markers of ovarian clear cell carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study of 279 ovarian tumours. Pathology 2015; 47; 105–111.
- 38Pitman MB, Young RH, Clement PB, Dickersin GR, Scully RE. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary and endometrium, oxyphilic cell type: a report of nine cases. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 1994; 13; 290–301.
- 39Ordi J, Schammel DP, Rasekh L, Tavassoli FA. Sertoliform endometrioid carcinomas of the ovary: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical study of 13 cases. Mod. Pathol. 1999; 12; 933–940.
- 40McCluggage WG. Immunoreactivity of ovarian juvenile granulosa cell tumours with epithelial membrane antigen. Histopathology 2005; 46; 235–236.
- 41McCluggage WG, Young RH. Ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors with pseudoendometrioid tubules (pseudoendometrioid Sertoli-Leydig cell tumors). Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2007; 31; 592–597.
- 42Tornos C, Silva EG, Ordonez NG, Gershenson DM, Young RH, Scully RE. Endometrioid carcinoma of the ovary with a prominent spindle-cell component, a source of diagnostic confusion. A report of 14 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995; 19; 1343–1353.
- 43Murray SK, Young RH, Scully RE. Endometrioid carcinomas of the uterine corpus with sex cord-like formations, hyalinization, and other unusual morphologic features: a report of 31 cases of a neoplasm that may be confused with carcinosarcoma and other uterine neoplasms. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2005; 29; 157–166.
- 44Rabban JT, Gilks CB, Malpica A, et al. Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2019; 38(Suppl. 1); S25–S39.
- 45Wang L, Rambau PF, Kelemen LE et al. Nuclear β-catenin and CDX2 expression in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma identify patients with favourable outcome. Histopathology 2019; 74; 452–462.
- 46Le Page C, Köbel M, Meunier L, Provencher DM, Mes-Masson AM, Rahimi K. A COEUR cohort study of SATB2 expression and its prognostic value in ovarian endometrioid carcinoma. J. Pathol. Clin. Res. 2019; 5; 177–188.
- 47Ervine A, Leung S, Gilks CB, McCluggage WG. Thyroid transcription factor-1 (TTF-1) immunoreactivity is an adverse prognostic factor in endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus. Histopathology 2014; 64; 840–846.
- 48Köbel M, Luo L, Grevers X et al. Ovarian carcinoma histotype: strengths and limitations of integrating morphology with immunohistochemical predictions. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2018; 38; 353–362.
- 49McNamee T, Damato S, McCluggage WG. Yolk sac tumours of the female genital tract in older adults derive commonly from somatic epithelial neoplasms: somatically derived yolk sac tumours. Histopathology 2016; 69; 739–751.
- 50Nogales FF, Prat J, Schuldt M et al. Germ cell tumour growth patterns originating from clear cell carcinomas of the ovary and endometrium: a comparative immunohistochemical study favouring their origin from somatic stem cells. Histopathology 2018; 72; 634–647.
- 51Nogales F, Bergeron C, Carvia RE et al. Ovarian endometrioid tumors with yolk sac tumor component, an unusual form of ovarian neoplasm: analysis of six cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1996; 20; 1056–1066.
- 52Ravishankar S, Malpica A, Ramalingam P, Euscher ED. Yolk sac tumor in extragonadal pelvic sites: still a diagnostic challenge. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 1–11.
- 53Clement PB, Young RH, Scully RE. Endometrioid-like variant of ovarian yolk sac tumor. A clinicopathological analysis of eight cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1987; 11; 767–778.
- 54 RJ Kurman, ML Carcangiu, CS Herrington, RH Young eds. World Health Organization classification of tumours of female reproductive organs. Lyon: IARC Press, 2014.
- 55Rutgers JL, Scully RE. Ovarian Mullerian mucinous papillary cystadenomas of borderline malignancy: a clinicopathologic analysis. Cancer 1988; 61; 340–348.
10.1002/1097-0142(19880115)61:2<340::AID-CNCR2820610225>3.0.CO;2-U CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 56Rodriguez IM, Irving JA, Prat J. Endocervical-like mucinous borderline tumors of the ovary: a clinicopathologic analysis of 31 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004; 28; 1311–1318.
- 57Taylor J, McCluggage WG. Ovarian seromucinous carcinoma: report of a series of a newly categorized and uncommon neoplasm. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2015; 39; 983–992.
- 58Rambau PF, McIntyre JB, Taylor J et al. Morphologic reproducibility, genotyping, and immunohistochemical profiling do not support a category of seromucinous carcinoma of the ovary. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2017; 41; 685–695.
- 59Bague S, Rodriquez IM, Prat J. Malignant mesonephric tumors of the female genital tract. A clinicopathologic study of 9 cases. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2004; 28; 601–607.
- 60Silver SA, Devouassoux-Shisheboran M, Mezzetti TP, Tavassoli FA. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix: a study of 11 cases with immunohistochemical findings. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2001; 25; 379–387.
- 61Kenny SL, McBride HA, Jamison J, McCluggage WG. Mesonephric adenocarcinomas of the uterine cervix and corpus: HPV-negative neoplasms that are commonly PAX8, CA125, and HMGA2 positive and that may be immunoreactive with TTF1 and hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-β. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2012; 36; 799–807.
- 62Clement PB, Young RH, Keh P, Ostor AG, Scully RE. Malignant mesonephric neoplasms of the uterine cervix. A report of eight cases, including four with a malignant spindle cell component. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 1995; 19; 1158–1171.
- 63McFarland M, Quick CM, McCluggage WG. Hormone receptor-negative, thyroid transcription factor 1-positive uterine and ovarian adenocarcinomas: report of a series of mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas. Histopathology 2016; 68; 1013–1020.
- 64Mirkovic J, Sholl LM, Garcia E et al. Targeted genomic profiling reveals recurrent KRAS mutations and gain of chromosome 1q in mesonephric carcinomas of the female genital tract. Mod. Pathol. 2015; 28; 1504–1514.
- 65Mirkovic J, McFarland M, Garcia E et al. Targeted genomic profiling reveals recurrent KRAS mutations in mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas of the female genital tract. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2018; 42; 227–233.
- 66Chapel DB, Joseph NM, Krausz T, Lastra RR. An ovarian adenocarcinoma with combined low-grade serous and mesonephric morphologies suggests a Müllerian origin for some mesonephric carcinomas. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2018; 37; 448–459.
- 67McCluggage WG, Vosmikova H, Laco J. Ovarian combined low-grade serous and mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma: further evidence for a Mullerian origin of mesonephric-like adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. E-pub ahead of print.
- 68Kolin DL, Costigan DC, Dong F, Nucci MR, Howitt BE. A combined morphologic and molecular approach to retrospectively identify KRAS-mutated mesonephric-like adenocarcinomas of the endometrium. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019; 43; 389–398.
- 69Wu H, Zhang L, Cao W et al. Mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014; 7; 7012–7019.
- 70Wani Y, Notohara K, Tsukayama C. Mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: a case report and review of the literature. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2008; 27; 346–352.
- 71Marquette A, Moerman P, Vergote I, Amant F. Second case of uterine mesonephric adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Gynecol. Cancer 2006; 16; 1450–1454.
- 72Na K, Kim HS. Clinicopathologic and molecular characteristics of mesonephric adenocarcinoma arising from the uterine body. Am. J. Surg. Pathol. 2019; 43; 12–25.
- 73Zhang L, Cai Z, Ambelil M, Conyers J, Zhu H. Mesonephric adenocarcinoma of the uterine corpus: report of 2 cases and review of the literature. Int. J. Gynecol. Pathol. 2019; 38; 224–229.