Activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma with aggressive phenotypes
Takuya Minagawa
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKen Yamazaki
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYohei Masugi
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHanako Tsujikawa
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHidenori Ojima
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTaizo Hibi
Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuta Abe
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroshi Yagi
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMinoru Kitago
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasahiro Shinoda
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorOsamu Itano
Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuko Kitagawa
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Michiie Sakamoto
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Professor Michiie Sakamoto, Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Conflict of interest: O.I. carried out joint research with Bayer Pharma AG. The other authors have no conflict of interest.
Search for more papers by this authorTakuya Minagawa
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKen Yamazaki
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYohei Masugi
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHanako Tsujikawa
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHidenori Ojima
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorTaizo Hibi
Department of Pediatric Surgery and Transplantation, Kumamoto University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuta Abe
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorHiroshi Yagi
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMinoru Kitago
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorMasahiro Shinoda
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorOsamu Itano
Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic and Gastrointestinal Surgery, School of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorYuko Kitagawa
Department of Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Michiie Sakamoto
Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Correspondence: Professor Michiie Sakamoto, Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan. Email: [email protected]
Conflict of interest: O.I. carried out joint research with Bayer Pharma AG. The other authors have no conflict of interest.
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Aim
Sorafenib inhibits multiple kinase signaling pathways, including the rat sarcoma virus (Ras)/rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (Raf)/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) pathway, and is a promising therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the role of ERK activation in HCC remains unclear. This study was designed to investigate the potential link between ERK activation and aggressive HCC phenotypes.
Methods
We evaluated nuclear ERK expression by immunohistochemistry in 154 resected HCC nodules from 136 patients. We then investigated the associations of ERK expression with the clinicopathological characteristics of HCC, c-MET expression, and the molecular subclass biomarkers Ki-67, keratin 19 (KRT19, CK19, or K19), and sal-like protein 4. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was carried out to determine independent prognostic factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. The effects of ERK activation by hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) on eight HCC cell lines were further examined.
Results
High-level nuclear expression of ERK was observed in 20 (13%) of 154 nodules and was significantly associated with higher serum alpha-fetoprotein levels (P = 0.034), poorer differentiation (P = 0.003), a higher Ki-67 index (P < 0.001), high-level expression of c-MET (P = 0.008), KRT19 (P = 0.002), or sal-like protein 4 (P < 0.001), and shorter overall survival (multivariate hazard ratio 3.448; P = 0.028) and recurrence-free survival (multivariate hazard ratio 2.755; P = 0.004). HCC cells treated with hepatocyte growth factor showed enhanced cell proliferation together with ERK activation and upregulated KRT19 expression, both of which were inhibited by sorafenib.
Conclusions
High-level ERK activation is associated with a KRT19-positive highly proliferative subtype of HCC with a dismal prognosis. These findings support the key role of the hepatocyte growth factor/c-MET/ERK axis in HCC progression.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
HEPR13445-sup 0002-suppo S1rev2.tiffTIFF image, 7.5 MB |
Figure S1. Immunohistochemical evaluation of tumor expressions of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) 1/2 and phosphorylated ERK1/2 (pERK1/2) in hepatocellular carcinoma specimens. |
HEPR13445-sup 0003-Figure S2.tiffTIFF image, 9.7 MB |
Figure S2. Survival analyses according to c-MET expression. |
HEPR13445-sup 0004-Figure S3.tiffTIFF image, 6.4 MB |
Figure S3. Relationship between baseline expression levels of phosphorylated of extracellular signal-regulated kinase (pERK) and sensitivity to sorafenib in eight hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. |
HEPR13445-sup 0005-Figure S4.tiffTIFF image, 3.4 MB |
Figure S4. Evaluation of expression levels of c-MET and fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 in eight hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines. |
HEPR13445-supp 0001-Supporting information.docxWord 2007 document , 56.3 KB |
Table S1. Clinicopathological characteristics stratified by c-MET expression levels in 154 hepatocellular carcinoma nodules from 136 patients |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin 2011; 61: 69–90.
- 2Govaere O, Komuta M, Berkers J et al. Keratin 19: a key role player in the invasion of human hepatocellular carcinomas. Gut 2014; 63: 674–685.
- 3Guzman G, Alagiozian-Angelova V, Layden-Almer JE et al. p53, Ki-67, and serum alpha feto-protein as predictors of hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence in liver transplant patients. Mod Pathol 2005; 18: 1498–1503.
- 4Mann CD, Neal CP, Garcea G, Manson MM, Dennison AR, Berry DP. Prognostic molecular markers in hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review. Eur J Cancer 2007; 43: 979–992.
- 5Llovet JM, Ricci S, Mazzaferro V et al. Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 378–390.
- 6Llovet JM, Villanueva A, Lachenmayer A, Finn RS. Advances in targeted therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma in the genomic era. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015; 12: 408–424.
- 7Cheng AL, Kang YK, Chen Z et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients in the Asia-Pacific region with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase III randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2009; 10: 25–34.
- 8Chuma M, Terashita K, Sakamoto N. New molecularly targeted therapies against advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: from molecular pathogenesis to clinical trials and future directions. Hepatol Res 2015; 45: E1–E11.
- 9Ikemoto T, Shimada M, Yamada S. Pathophysiology of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Hepatol Res 2016; 47: 23–30.
- 10Kudo M, Finn RS, Qin S et al. Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2018; 349: 1163–1173.
- 11Bruix J, Qin S, Merle P et al. Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2017; 389: 56–66.
- 12Kelley RK, Verslype C, Cohn AL et al. Cabozantinib in hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a phase 2 placebo-controlled randomized discontinuation study. Ann Oncol 2017; 28: 528–534.
- 13Nakamoto Y. Promising new strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatol Res 2017; 47: 251–265.
- 14Lenormand P, Sardet C, Pagès G, L'Allemain G, Brunet A, Pouysségur J. Growth factors induce nuclear translocation of MAP kinases (p42mapk and p44mapk) but not of their activator MAP kinase kinase (p45mapkk) in fibroblasts. J Cell Biol 1993; 122: 1079–1088.
- 15Sematar AA, Pl P. Targeting RAS-ERK signaling in cancer: promises and challenges. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2014; 13: 928–942.
- 16Li L, Zhao GD, Shi Z, Qi LL, Zhou LY, Fu ZX. The Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK signaling pathway and its role in the occurrence and development of HCC. Oncol Lett 2016; 12: 3045–3050.
- 17Gailhouste L, Ezan F, Bessard A et al. RNAi-mediated MEK1 knock-down prevents ERK1/2 activation and abolishes human hepatocellular carcinoma growth in vitro and in vivo. Int J Cancer 2010; 126: 1367–1377.
- 18Tsuboi Y, Ichida T, Sugitani S et al. Overexpression of extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and its correlation with proliferation in human hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Int 2004; 24: 432–436.
- 19Matsumoto K, Umitsu M, De Silva DM et al. Hepatocyte growth factor/MET in cancer progression and biomarker discovery. Cancer Sci 2017; 108: 296–307.
- 20Fasolo A, Sessa C, Gianni L, Broggini M. Seminars in clinical pharmacology: an introduction to MET inhibitors for the medical oncologist. Ann Oncol 2013; 24: 14–20.
- 21Goyal L, Muzumdar MD, Zhu AX. Targeting the HGF/c-MET pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2013; 19: 2310–2318.
- 22Kaposi-Novak P. Met-regulated expression signature defines a subset of human hepatocellular carcinomas with poor prognosis and aggressive phenotype. J Clin Invest 2006; 116: 1582–1595.
- 23Schmitz KJ, Wohlschlaeger J, Lang H et al. Activation of the ERK and AKT signalling pathway predicts poor prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma and ERK activation in cancer tissue is associated with hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol 2008; 48: 83–90.
- 24Chen L, Shi Y, Jiang CY, Wei LX, Wang YL, Dai GH. Expression and prognostic role of pan-Ras, Raf-1, pMEK1 and pERK1/2 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Surg Oncol 2011; 37: 513–520.
- 25Tsujikawa H, Masugi Y, Yamazaki K, Itano O, Kitagawa Y, Sakamoto M. Immunohistochemical molecular analysis indicates hepatocellular carcinoma subgroups that reflect tumor aggressiveness. Human Pathol 2016; 50: 24–33.
- 26 FT Bosman, F Carneiro, RH Hruban, ND Theise (Eds). WHO Classification of Tumours of the Digestive System, Vol 3, Fourth Edition: LyonIARC, 2010.
- 27Kudo M, Kitano M, Sakurai T, Nishida N. General rules for the clinical and pathological study of primary liver cancer, nationwide follow-up survey and clinical practice guidelines: the outstanding achievements of the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan. Dig Dis 2015; 33: 765–770.
- 28Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group Hepatology 1996; 24: 289–293.
- 29Kondo S, Ojima H, Tsuda H et al. Clinical impact of c-Met expression and its gene amplification in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Clin Oncol 2013; 18: 207–213.
- 30Murakami T. Establishment and characterization of human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line (KIM-1). Acta Hepatol Jpn 1984; 25: 532–539.
10.2957/kanzo.25.532 Google Scholar
- 31Yano H, Maruiwa M, Murakami T et al. A new human pleomorphic hepatocellular carcinoma cell line, KYN-2. Acta Pathol Jpn 1988; 38: 953–966.
- 32Osada T, Sakamoto M, Ino Y et al. E-cadherin is involved in the intrahepatic metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1996; 24: 1460–1467.
- 33Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9: 671–675.
- 34Kim H, Choi GH, Na DC et al. Human hepatocellular carcinomas with “stemness”-related marker expression: keratin 19 expression and a poor prognosis. Hepatology 2011; 54: 1707–1717.
- 35Oikawa T, Kamiya A, Zeniya M et al. Sal-like protein 4 (SALL4), a stem cell biomarker in liver cancers. Hepatology 2013; 57: 1469–1483.
- 36Wilhelm SM, Carter C, Tang L et al. BAY 43-9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 2004; 64: 7099–7109.
- 37Liu L, Cao Y, Chen C et al. Sorafenib blocks the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway, inhibits tumor angiogenesis, and induces tumor cell apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma model PLC/PRF/5. Cancer Res 2006; 66: 11851–11858.
- 38Toyoda H, Kumada T, Tada T, Sone Y, Kaneoka Y, Maeda A. Tumor markers for hepatocellular carcinoma: simple and significant predictors of outcome in patients with HCC. Liver Cancer 2015; 4: 126–136.
- 39Schlessinger J. Cell signaling by receptor tyrosine kinases. Cell 2000; 103: 211–225.
- 40Faure M, Voyno-Yasenetskaya TA, Boume HR. cAMP and beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in COS-7 cells. J Biol Chem 1994; 269: 7851–7854.
- 41Wetzker R, Bohmer FD. Transactivation joins multiple tracks to the ERK/MAPK cascade. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2003; 4: 651–657.
- 42Rimassa L, Assenat E, Peck-Radosavljevic M et al. Tivantinib for second-line treatment of MET-high, advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (METIV-HCC): a final analysis of a phase 3, randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Oncol 2018; 19: 682–693.
- 43Abou-Alfa GK, Mayer T, Cheng AL et al. Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2018; 379: 54–63.
- 44Raja A, Park I, Haq F, Ahn SM. FGF19-FGFR4 signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 2019; 8. https://doi.org/10.3390/cells8060536.
- 45Simons M, Gordon E, Claesson-Welsh L. Mechanism and regulation of endothelial VEGF receptor signaling. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2016; 17: 611–625.
- 46Ho HK, Pok S, Streit S et al. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 4 regulates proliferation, anti-apoptosis and alpha-fetoprotein secretion during hepatocellular carcinoma progression and represents a potential target for therapeutic intervention. J Hepatol 2009; 50: 118–127.
- 47Zhao H, Lv F, Liang G et al. FGF19 promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by modulating the GSK3ß/ß-catenin signaling cascade via FGFR4 activation. Oncotarget 2016; 7: 13575–13586.
- 48You H, Ding W, Dang H et al. c-Met represents a potential therapeutic target for personalized treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2011; 54: 879–889.
- 49Zucman-Rossi J, Villanueva A, Nault JC, Llovet JM. Genetic landscape and biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2015; 149: 1226–1239.
- 50Zucman-Rossi J. Molecular classification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Dig Liver Dis 2010; 42(Suppl 3): S235–S241.
- 51Boyault S, Rickman DS, de Reyniès A et al. Transcriptome classification of HCC is related to gene alterations and to new therapeutic targets. Hepatology 2007; 45: 42–52.
- 52Lee JS, Chu IS, Heo J et al. Classification and prediction of survival in hepatocellular carcinoma by gene expression profiling. Hepatology 2004; 40: 667–676.
- 53Nault JC, De Reyniès A, Villanueva A et al. A hepatocellular carcinoma 5-gene score associated with survival of patients after liver resection. Gastroenterology 2013; 145: 176–187.
- 54Hoshida Y, Toffanin S, Lachenmayer A, Villanueva A, Minguez B, Llovet JM. Molecular classification and novel targets in hepatocellular carcinoma: recent achievements. Semin Liver Dis 2010; 30: 35–51.
- 55Uenishi T, Kubo S, Yamamoto T et al. Cytokeratin 19 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma predicts early postoperative recurrence. Cancer Sci 2003; 94: 851–857.
- 56Tsuchiya K, Komuta M, Yasui Y et al. Expression of keratin 19 is related to high recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after radiofrequency ablation. Oncology 2011; 80: 278–288.
- 57Rhee H, Kim HY, Choi JH et al. Keratin 19 expression in hepatocellular carcinoma is regulated by fibroblast-derived HGF via a MET-ERK1/2-AP1 and SP1 axis. Cancer Res 2018; 78: 1619–1631.
- 58Zhang Z, Zhou XY, Shen HJ, Wang D, Wang Y. Phosphorylated ERK is a potential predictor of sensitivity to sorafenib when treating hepatocellular carcinoma: evidence from an in vitro study. BMC Med 2009; 7: 41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1741-7015-7-41.
- 59Abou-Alfa GK, Schwartz L, Ricci S et al. Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 4293–4300.