Volume 27, Issue 4 e12859
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Core components of Communication Skills Training in oncology: A synthesis of the literature contrasted with consensual recommendations

Friedrich Stiefel

Friedrich Stiefel

Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Mirjam de Vries

Mirjam de Vries

Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Céline Bourquin

Corresponding Author

Céline Bourquin

Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland

Correspondence

Céline Bourquin, Psychiatric Liaison Service, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 June 2018
Citations: 15
F. Stiefel and M. de Vries should be considered joint first author.

Abstract

This systematic review synthesises the literature on Communication Skills Training (CST) programmes for oncology professionals to identify their core components and compare them with the recommendations formulated in a position paper based on a European expert consensus meeting. A systematic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE (OVID and PUBMED), CINAHL, EMBASE, PSYCHINFO, Web of Science and the Cochrane Library. The analytic approach relied on an a priori framework based on the position paper's recommendations, generating several themes. Forty-nine articles were included. The CST programmes reported between 2010 and 2016 were heterogeneous. Some recommendations, especially those regarding content and pedagogic tools, were followed by most providers, while others, such as setting, objectives and participants, were not. This synthesis raises questions on how CST programmes are conceived and how they could or should be conceived in future. While medicine, especially clinical communication, is socially and culturally embedded, some recommendations regarding CST programmes seem to be universally valuable, contributing to ensure quality and enhanced credibility, and thus endorsement and sustained implementation, of CST programmes in the oncology setting.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.