Volume 64, Issue 4 pp. 3469-3494
RESEARCH ARTICLE

Respond or not? Analyst recommendation and companies' press releases after adverse events

Tiffany Chiu

Tiffany Chiu

School of Business, State University of New York at New Paltz, New Paltz, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Victoria Chiu

Victoria Chiu

School of Business, State University of New York at Oswego, Oswego, New York, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Aiguo Wang

Aiguo Wang

School of Accountancy, Shandong University of Finance and Economics, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Tawei Wang

Corresponding Author

Tawei Wang

School of Accountancy & MIS, DePaul University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Correspondence

Tawei Wang, School of Accountancy & MIS, DePaul University, 1 E Jackson Blvd, Suite 6000, Chicago, IL 60604, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Yunsen Wang

Yunsen Wang

Department of Accounting and Finance, Feliciano School of Business, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 April 2024

Abstract

This study examines whether management responds to adverse events and how the press releases after adverse events are associated with analyst recommendation. Using Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Section 10b lawsuits – manipulative and deceptive practices in securities trading – as the proxy for adverse events, we show that companies do not always address the events. However, by issuing a press release within 2 days after the event, the negative effect of the lawsuit on analyst recommendation is smaller. This study advances our understanding in responding to adverse events and provides practical implications for managers.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.