Volume 73, Issue 4 pp. 329-335
Original Research

Evaluation of a process of implementation of a gestational diabetes nutrition model of care into practice

Shelley A. Wilkinson

Corresponding Author

Shelley A. Wilkinson

Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland

Mothers’ & Babies Theme, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland

(Former) NHMRC TRIP Research Fellow

Correspondence: S. Wilkinson, Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Level 3 Salmon Building, Mater Health Services, Raymond Terrace, South Brisbane, Qld 4101, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sally McCray

Sally McCray

Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland

Search for more papers by this author
Michael Beckmann

Michael Beckmann

Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland

Mothers’ & Babies Theme, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland

Search for more papers by this author
H. David McIntyre

H. David McIntyre

Mater Mothers’ Hospital, Mater Health Services, Brisbane, Queensland

Mothers’ & Babies Theme, Mater Research Institute, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 October 2015
Citations: 16
S. Wilkinson, PhD, AdvAPD, Senior Research Dietitian
S. McCray, GradDipNut&Diet, APD, Director of Nutrition and Dietetics
M. Beckmann, FRANZCOG, Director of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
H.D. McIntyre, MD, FRACP, Director of Obstetric Medicine

Abstract

Aim

Poorly controlled gestational diabetes mellitus can result in negative pregnancy and delivery outcomes. A reduced need for insulin was documented in the validation of American gestational diabetes Nutrition Practice Guidelines, which recommend at least three dietitian visits. No Australian gestational diabetes mellitus nutrition guidelines exist. This paper evaluates the implementation of a dietetic model of care based on the American guidelines in an Australian hospital.

Methods

The implementation plan consisted of a nine-month pre (usual care)/post (new model of care) design with a month for ‘integration’ across 2012–2013. Primary outcomes were uptake of the new dietetic model of care and requirement for pharmacotherapy.

Results

Both phases ran for seven months; integration required four months. Pre-intervention, only one woman received a review appointment. Significantly more women received best-practice care post-implementation (P = 0.02); of the 162 women seen, 50.6% received two review appointments. As a result of heavy clinical demand, only 31.5% of the women seen post-implementation received an individual dietitian assessment and education session, deviating from best practice. Clinically relevant changes were seen in medication requirements with a decrease in women requiring pharmacological treatment (31.1% (pre); 26.9% (post)). The difference was more pronounced in women who received best-practice care (27.2% (no) vs 25.0% (yes)).

Conclusions

This project successfully increased the proportion of women seen according to best practice. Service limitations impaired the delivery of optimal care. The present study illustrates the opportunities and challenges of conducting evidence-based implementation research in routine clinical care.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.