Volume 5, Issue 4 pp. 265-269

A comparative trial of two surface subunit recombinant hepatitis B vaccines vs a surface and PreS subunit vaccine for immunization of healthy adults

C. P. Eyigün

C. P. Eyigün

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey and,

Transplant Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
S. Yilmaz

S. Yilmaz

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey and,

Search for more papers by this author
C. Gül

C. Gül

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey and,

Search for more papers by this author
A. Sengül

A. Sengül

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey and,

Search for more papers by this author
A. Hacibektasoglu

A. Hacibektasoglu

Department of Infectious Diseases, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey and,

Search for more papers by this author
D. H. Van Thiel

D. H. Van Thiel

Transplant Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 February 2002
Citations: 10
Dr D. H. Van Thiel Building 114, Room 54, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 South First Avenue, Maywood, IL 60153, USA

Abstract

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is the leading cause of chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis in Turkey. The prevalence of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) positivity in Turkey is 5 to 10%. HBV is almost completely preventable with the use of hepatitis B vaccines. The most commonly used vaccine is that which contains the predominant viral surface (S) polypeptide. It elicits protective antibodies in greater than 90% of healthy subjects. A vaccine containing the PreS1 and PreS2 antigenic domains has recently been reported as being more efficient in achieving successful immunization in individuals who have not previously responded to the isolated S-antigen vaccine. In this study, the efficacy of a S and PreS-containing vaccine was compared with that of two different standard isolated S-antigen-containing vaccines in terms of the immunization protection produced against HBV in normal healthy adults who had not previously been immunized. Seventy-six young adults (aged 17–22) were randomly assigned to receive 1ml (20μg) of either one of two standard S-subunit recombinant hepatitis B vaccines (Engerix B, or Hepavax) or the combined S and PreS subunit vaccine (Gen Hevac B) intramuscularly in the deltoid muscle at 0, 1 and 2 months. Hepatitis B surface antigen antibody titres were measured at 1, 2 and 12 months. A titre ≥10IUml–1 was considered to be protective. All subjects receiving the two standard isolated S-antigen-containing vaccines responded to the vaccination with reasonable antibody titres. One-half to two-thirds of those vaccinated developed high antibody titres (>100IUml–1). In contrast, 9% of those receiving the combined PreS1 and PreS2 plus S antigens failed to respond, as demonstrated by antibody titres below the level considered to be protective. The mean titres at 12 months were 107±12IUml–1 (Engerix B), 102±12IUml–1 (Gen Hevac B) and 117±12IUml–1 (Hepavax Gene). Hence, no important difference in term of response to vaccination was found between the two different types of vaccines. As recombinant S-subunit vaccines are less expensive than those that combine S and PreS antigens, it is suggested that, when immunizing normal healthy adults, a standard isolated S-antigen-containing vaccine should be used.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.