Seismic protection of low- to moderate-mass buildings using RNC isolator
Mohammed Ismail
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Ph.D. Candidate.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
José Rodellar
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Applied Mathematics III, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Campus Nord, Module C-2, 08034-Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorFaycal Ikhouane
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Professor.
Search for more papers by this authorMohammed Ismail
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Ph.D. Candidate.
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
José Rodellar
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Department of Applied Mathematics III, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Campus Nord, Module C-2, 08034-Barcelona, SpainSearch for more papers by this authorFaycal Ikhouane
Department of Applied Mathematics III, Control, Dynamics and Application Laboratory, School of Civil Engineering, Technical University of Catalonia, Barcelona, Spain
Professor.
Search for more papers by this authorSUMMARY
The general objective of base isolation is to increase the natural period of vibration of the structures out of the typical earthquake dominant periods through increasing their flexibility. This objective is particularly important for light- to moderate-weight structures as low masses imply lower natural periods. This paper presents the application of a new roll-n-cage (RNC) base isolator to mitigate the seismic response of this class of structures. From a functional point of view, RNC is essentially an isolation bearing, while it offers a significant resistance to wind and minor vibrations. Rolling is the basic mechanical principle adopted to offer a great range of horizontal flexibility, which is complemented with an energy dissipation mechanism. The device is designed to have several practical controls to ensure buffer, re-centering and no uplift during motion. In this paper, the principles of operation and force–displacement relationships of the novel RNC isolator are presented, along with its implementation and performance evaluation considering a wide range of structural, isolator and ground motion characteristics. The numerical results show that the proposed bearing is a useful tool for isolating light- to moderate-mass systems, and it can mitigate the seismic response under a variety of ground motion excitations while exhibiting the robust performance for a wide range of structures. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
REFERENCES
- 1 Jangid RS, Datta TK. Seismic behavior of base isolated building: a state-of-the-art-review. Structures and Buildings 1995; 110(2): 186–203.
- 2
Kelly JM. Seismic isolation of civil buildings in the U.S.A. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 1998; 3: 279–285.
10.1002/pse.2260010309 Google Scholar
- 3 Kelly TE. Base isolation of structures, design guidlines. Technical Report, Holmes Consulting Group Ltd, 2001.
- 4 Robinson WH, Tucker AG. A lead-rubber shear damper. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 1977; 10(3): 151–153.
- 5 Robinson WH, Tucker AG. Test results for lead-rubber bearings for the william m. clayton building, toe toe bridge, and waiotukupuna bridge. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 1983; 14(1): 21–33.
- 6 Tyler RG, Robinson WH. High-strain tests on lead-rubber bearings for earthquake loadings. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 1984; 17: 90–105.
- 7 Derham CJ, Kelly JM, Tomas AG. Nonlinear natural rubber bearings for seismic isolation. Nuclear Engineering and Design 1985; 84(3): 417–428.
- 8 Al-Hussaini TM, Zayas VA, Constantinou MC. Seismic isolation of a multi-story frame structure using spherical sliding isolation systems. Technical Report, NCEER-94-0007, National Center of Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo, NY, 1994.
- 9 Murnal P, Sinha R. Aseismic design of structure–equipment systems using variable frequency pendulum isolator. Nuclear Engineering and Design 2004; 231: 129–139.
- 10 Lin TW, Hone CC. Base isolation by free rolling rods under basement. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22: 261–273.
- 11 Jangid RS, Londhe YB. Effectiveness of elliptical rolling rods for base isolation. Journal of Structural Engineering(ASCE) 1998; 124: 469–472.
- 12 Zhou Q, Lu X, Wang Q, Feng D, Yao Q. Dynamic analysis on structures base-isolated by a ball system with restoring property. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1998; 27: 773–791.
- 13 Barghian M, Shahabi AB. A new approach to pendulum base isolation. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2007; 14: 177–185.
- 14 Touaillon J. Improvement in buildings. United States Patent Letters No. 99973, 1870.
- 15 Kasalanati A, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou M, Sanders D. Experimental study of ball-in-cone isolation system. ASCE/Structures Congress, Portland, OR, April 1997; 1191–1195.
- 16 Kasalanti A, Sanders D, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou M. Experimental study of ball-in-cone isolation system. Twelfth US-Japan Bridge Engineering Workshop (UJNR—Panel on Wind and Seismic Effects), Buffalo, NY, October 1996; Sect. 6(4).
- 17 Kemeny ZA. Ball-in-cone seismic isolation bearing. United States Patent No. 5 599 106, 1997.
- 18 Robinson WH, Gannon CR, Meyer J. A roball with an elastic restoring force. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society of Earthquake Engineering 2006; 39(1): 85–88.
- 19 Shustov VN. Multi-step base isolator. United States Patent No. 5 056 280, 1991.
- 20 Kawai N, Shiki K. Base isolator having mutually eccentric rotators. United States Patent No. 5 934 029, 1999.
- 21 Kim JK. Directional rolling pendulum seismic isolation systems and roller assembly therefor. United States Patent No. 6 725 612 B2, 2004.
- 22 Damon GD, Bair JJ, Braun ER. Roller and ball bearing isolator. United States Patent No. 5 044 789, 1991.
- 23 Haak WR. Seismic isolator. United States Patent No. 5 716 037, 1998.
- 24 Lee GC, Liang Z, Niu TC. Seismic isolation bearing. United States Patent No. 6 971 795 B2, 2005.
- 25 Omi T, Ohiraki M. Seismic isolator for exhibits. United States Patent No. 6 364 274 B1, 2002.
- 26 Otsuka S, Hayahawa K, Shimoda I, Suzuki K, Mochimaru M, Miyazaki M. Seismic isolation apparatus. United States Patent No. 6 123 313, 2000.
- 27 Yano K. Base isolated building of wind resisting type. United States Patent No. 5 689 919, 1997.
- 28 Yasuda M, Minbu S, Pan G, Nakashima M. Vibration control unit and vibration control body. United States Patent No. 7 278 623 B2, 2007.
- 29
Kelly JM. Seismic isolation. In Earthquake Engineering: From Engineering Seismology to Performance-Based Engineering, Chapter 11, Y Bozorgnia, V Bertero (eds). CRC Press LLC: Philadelphia, U.S.A., 2004.
10.1201/9780203486245.ch11 Google Scholar
- 30 Casciati F, Faravelli L. A passive control device with SMA components: from the prototype to the model. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; DOI: 10.1002/stc.328.
- 31 Casciati F, Faravelli L, Al Saleh R. An SMA passive device proposed within the highway bridge benchmark. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2009; DOI: 10.1002/stc.332.
- 32 Casciati F, Faravelli L, Hamdaoui K. Performance of a base isolator with shape memory alloy bars. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2007; 6(4): 401–408.
- 33 Casciati F, Hamdaoui K. Modelling the uncertainty in the response of a base isolator. Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 2008; 23: 427–437.
- 34 Doudoumis IN, Papadopoulos P, Papaliangas T. Low-cost base isolation system on artificial soil layers with low shearing resistance. Twelfth European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (Paper Reference 661), London, U.K., 2002.
- 35 Hamidi M, El Naggar MH, Vafai A, Ahmadi G. Seismic isolation of buildings with sliding concave foundation (SCF). Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32: 15–29.
- 36 Panchal VR, Jangid RS. Variable friction pendulum system for near-fault ground motions. Structural Control and Health Monitoring 2007; 15(4): 568–584.
- 37 Pranesh M, Sinha R. VFPI: an isolation device for aseismic design. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2000; 29: 603–627.
- 38 Robinson WH, Gannon CR, Meyer J. A sliding bearing with an elastic restoring force. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 2006; 39(1): 81–84.
- 39 Tsai CS, Chiang TC, Chen BJ. Seismic behavior of MFPS isolated structure under near-fault sources and strong ground motions with long predominant periods. In ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Seismic Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A., Chen JC (ed.), vol. 466, 20–24 July 2003; 73–79.
- 40 Tsai CS, Chiang TC, Chen BJ. Shaking table tests of a full scale steel structure isolated with MFPS. In ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference, Seismic Engineering, Cleveland, Ohio, U.S.A., Chen JC (ed.), vol. 466, 20–24 July 2003; 41–47.
- 41 Tsang HH. Seismic isolation by rubber–soil mixtures for developing countries. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37: 283–303.
- 42 Xiao H, Butterworth JW, Larkin T. Low-technology techniques for seismic isolation. Paper Number 36. NZSEE Conference, Rototua, New Zealand, 2004.
- 43 Ismail M, Rodellar J, Ikhouane F. A seismic isolation system for supported objects. Spanish Patent No. P200802043, Spanish Office of Patents and Marks, 2008.
- 44 Ismail M, Rodellar J, Ikhouane F. An innovative isolation bearing for motion-sensitive equipment. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2009; 326(3–5): 503–521.
- 45 Ismail M, Rodellar J, Ikhouane F. Performance of structure-equipment systems with a novel roll-n-cage isolation bearing. Computers and Structures 2009; 87: 1631–1646.
- 46 Ismail M, Rodellar J, Ikhouane F. An innovative isolation device for aseismic design. Engineering Structures 2010; 32(4): 1168–1183.
- 47 ANSYS release 11 documentation. ANSYS, Inc. Southpointe, 275 Technology Drive, Canonsburg, PA 15317, 2008.
- 48 AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, SI Units ( 3rd edn). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 2005. Interim Revisions.
- 49
Naeim F,
Kelly JM. Design of Seismic Isolated Structures—From Theory to Practice. Wiley: New York, 1999.
10.1002/9780470172742 Google Scholar
- 50 Skinner RI, Robinson WH, McVerry GH. An Introduction to Seismic Isolation. Wiley: Chichester, England, 1993.
- 51 Wen YK. Method for random vibration of hysteretic systems. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 1976; 102(EM2): 246–263.
- 52 Sivaselvan MV, Reinhorn AM. Hysteretic models for deteriorating inelastic structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2000; 126(6): 633–640.
- 53 Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. On the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model. Part I: Forced limit cycle characterization. Nonlinear Dynamics 2005; 42: 63–78.
- 54 Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. On the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model. Part II: Robust parametric identification. Nonlinear Dynamics 2005; 42: 79–95.
- 55 Ikhouane F, Gomis-Bellmunt O. A limit cycle approach for the parametric identification of hysteretic systems. Systems and Control Letters 2008; 57: 663–669.
- 56 SAP2000 release 11 documentation. Computer and Structure, Inc., 1995 University Ave, Berkeley, CA 94704, 2008.
- 57 Wilson EL. Three-Dimensional Static and Dynamic Analysis of Structures ( 3rd edn). CSI, Computers and Structures, Inc.: Berkeley, CA, U.S.A., 2002.
- 58 Ikhouane F, Mañosa V, Rodellar J. Dynamic properties of the hysteretic Bouc-Wen model. Systems and Control Letters 2007; 56: 197–205.
- 59 Ismail M, Ikhouane F, Rodellar J. The hysteresis Bouc-Wen model, a survey. Journal of Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 2009; 16: 161–188.
- 60 Chen Y, Ahmadi G. Wind effects on base-isolated structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1992; 118: 1708–1727.
- 61
Jangid RS,
Kelly JM. Torsional displacements in base-isolated buildings. Earthquake Spectra 2000; 16: 443–454.
10.1193/1.1586120 Google Scholar
- 62 Younis CJ, Tadjbakhsh IG. Response of sliding rigid structure to base excitation. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 1984; 110: 417–432.