Volume 55, Issue 3 pp. 599-606
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

What is a clinically meaningful change in exhaled nitric oxide for children with asthma?

Shona Fielding PhD

Shona Fielding PhD

Medical Statistics Team, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Marielle Pijnenburg PhD

Marielle Pijnenburg PhD

Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Johan de Jongste PhD

Johan de Jongste PhD

Department of Paediatric Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Erasmus MC Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Katherine Pike PhD

Katherine Pike PhD

Clinical and Experimental Science Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Respiratory Critical Care and Anaesthesia group, Institute of Child Health, University College London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Graham Roberts PhD

Graham Roberts PhD

Clinical and Experimental Science Academic Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Helen Petsky PhD

Helen Petsky PhD

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland's Children's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Anne B. Chang PhD

Anne B. Chang PhD

Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Queensland's Children's Hospital, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Australia

Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Fritsch MD

Maria Fritsch MD

University Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Frischer MD

Thomas Frischer MD

University Children's Hospital, Vienna, Austria

Search for more papers by this author
Stanley Szefler PhD

Stanley Szefler PhD

Department of Pediatrics, Breathing Institute, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado

Search for more papers by this author
Peter Gergen PhD

Peter Gergen PhD

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Bethesda, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Françoise Vermeulen MD

Françoise Vermeulen MD

Department of Paediatrics, Hôpital Erasme, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Robin Vael MD

Robin Vael MD

Department of Paediatrics, Antwerp University Hospital, Antwerp, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Steve Turner MD

Corresponding Author

Steve Turner MD

Child Health, University of Aberdeen, UK

Correspondence Professor Steve Turner, Child Health, Royal Aberdeen Children's Hospital, Aberdeen AB25 2ZG, UK.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 January 2020
Citations: 9

Abstract

Introduction

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) may be a useful objective measurement to guide asthma treatment. What remains uncertain is what change in FENO is clinically significant.

Methods

An individual patient data analysis was performed using data from seven randomized clinical trials which used FENO to guide asthma treatment. The absolute and percentage intra-subject change in FENO measurements over “stable” and also “unstable” 3-month periods were described.

Results

Data were available in 1112 randomized controlled trial participants and ≥1 stable period was present for 665 individuals. The interquartile range (IQR) and limits of agreement (LoA) for change in absolute FENO among individuals whose initial FENO was <50 parts per billion (ppb) were −7 to +9 ppb and −43 to +50 ppb, and for those with initial FENO ≥50 ppb IQR was −29 to +17 ppb and LoA was −80 to +76 ppb. For percentage change in FENO, the IQR and LoA for individuals whose initial FENO was <50 ppb were −33% to +51% and −157% to +215%, and for those with initial FENO ≥50 ppb were −33% to +35% and −159% to +192%. The variation in FENO values for a stable period was similar irrespective of whether it was followed by a stable or unstable period.

Conclusions

Over a 3-month period where FENO is initially <50 ppb, a rise of <10 ppb or of <50% (based on IQR) is unlikely to be related to asthma. When FENO is initially ≥50 ppb an percentage change of <50% (based on IQR) is unlikely to be asthma-related.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.