Application of modified Kalina cycle in biomass chp plants
Branislav Jaćimović
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorSrbislav Genić
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nikola Jaćimović
DPE Conceptual Design Division, Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A, Buttrio, Italy
Correspondence
Nikola Jaćimović, DPE Conceptual Design Division, Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., Via Nazionale 41, 33042 Buttrio (UD), Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorBranislav Jaćimović
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorSrbislav Genić
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Nikola Jaćimović
DPE Conceptual Design Division, Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A, Buttrio, Italy
Correspondence
Nikola Jaćimović, DPE Conceptual Design Division, Danieli & C. Officine Meccaniche S.p.A., Via Nazionale 41, 33042 Buttrio (UD), Italy.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorSummary
This paper presents alternatives to Kalina cycles typically used in place of the organic Rankine cycle in biomass power plants. Overviews of both Rankine and Kalina cycles are given alongside the possibilities of using biomass as a viable energy source and recommended guidelines from the engineering practice for selection and management of these cycles. Benefits of Kalina novel bottoming cycle (and the alternative cycles presented herewith) over the Rankine cycle are the higher thermodynamic cycle efficiency and lower capital expenditures combined with the possibility of using low-grade heat sources, such as biomass or waste heat from exhaust gases. Analysis of ammonia-water binary system under various operating conditions has been performed for all the proposed cycles based on the published references and it has been shown that the proposed alternative models prove to be simpler and to have similar or even greater thermodynamic efficiency compared with the Kalina novel bottoming cycle.
REFERENCES
- 1Ogriseck S. Integration of Kalina cycle in a combined heat and power plant, a case study. Appl Therm Eng. 2009; 29: 2843-2848.
- 2Yari M, Mehr AS, Zare V, Mahmoudi SMS, Rosen MA. Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source. Energy. 2015; 83: 712-722.
- 3Saffari H, Sadeghi S, Khoshzat M, Mehregan P. Thermodynamic analysis and optimization of a geothermal Kalina cycle system using artificial bee Colony algorithm. Renewable Energy. 2016; 89: 154-167.
- 4Shokati N, Ranjbar F, Yari M. Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: a comparative study. Renewable Energy. 2015; 83: 527-542.
- 5Fiaschi D, Manfrida G, Rogai E, Talluri L. Exergoeconomic analysis and comparison between ORC and Kalina cycles to exploit low and medium-high temperature heat from two different geothermal sites. Energy Convers Manage. 2017; 154: 503-516.
- 6Modi A, Haglind F. Thermodynamic optimisation and analysis of four Kalina cycle layouts for high temperature applications. Appl Therm Eng. 2014; 76: 196-205.
- 7Mahmoudi SMS, Pourreza A, Akbari AD, Yari M. Exergoeconomic evaluation and optimization of a novel combined augmented Kalina cycle/gas turbine-modular helium reactor. Appl Therm Eng. 2016; 109(part A): 109-120.
- 8Li X, Zhang Q, Li X. A Kalina cycle with ejector. Energy. 2013; 54: 212-219.
- 9Fallah SM, Mahmoudi SMS, Yari M, Ghiasi RA. Advanced exergy analysis of the Kalina cycle applied for low temperature enhanced geothermal system. Energy Convers Manage. 2016; 108: 190-201.
- 10Madhawa Hettiarachchi HD, Golubovic M, Worek WM, Ikegami Y. The performance of the Kalina cycle system 11 (KCS-11) with low-temperature heat sources. J Energy Resour Technol. September 2007; 129: 243-247.
- 11Jacimovic B, Genic S. Reconsideration of T–P–x–y data and correlations for ammonia–water mixture for pressures up to 100 bar. Fluid Phase Equilibria. 2018; 463: 62-68.
- 12Jacimovic B, Genic S. Reconsideration of enthalpy and entropy data and correlations for ammonia–up to 100 bar water mixture and 535 °C. Int J Refrig. 2019; 100: 83-92.
- 13Karimi MN, Ahmad M. Optimization of Kalina cycle. Int J Sci Res. 2016; 5: 32-35.
- 14Nasruddin RU, Maulana R, Agus N. Energy and exergy analysis of Kalina cycle system (KCS) 34 with mass fraction ammonia-water mixture variation. J Mech Sci Technol. 2009; 23: 1871-1876.
- 15https://www.electrical4u.com/rankine-cycle-efficiency-improvement-techniques/
- 16Yadav R. Steam and Gas Turbines and Power Plant Engineering. 7th ed. India: Central Book Publishers; 2000.
- 17Shcheglyaev AV. In: BM Troyanovsky, ed. Steam Turbines. Vol 2. 6th ed. Moscow: Energoatomizdat; 1993.
- 18Ohji A, Haraguchi M. Steam turbine cycles and cycle design optimization: the Rankine cycle, thermal power cycles, and IGCC power plants. Advances in Steam Turbines for Modern Power Plants. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd.; 2017: 11–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-100314-5.00002-6.
10.1016/B978-0-08-100314-5.00002-6 Google Scholar
- 19Leyzerovich AS. Steam Turbines for Modern Fossil Fuel Power Plants. Lilburn, USA: Tha Fairmont Press Inc.; 2008.
- 20Larjola J. Organic Rankine cycle (ORC) based waste heat/waste fuel recovery systems for small combined heat and power (CHP) applications. Small and Micro Combined Heat and Power (CHP) Systems. Lappeenranta University of Technology Finland: Woodhead Publishing Limited; 2011.
10.1533/9780857092755.2.206 Google Scholar
- 21http://www.energyjustice.net/biomass
- 22https://www.processingmagazine.com/steam-turbine-flow-operation/
- 23Riva, G., Foppa Pedretti, E., Toscano, G., Corinaldesi, F., Model for the Forecasting of the Fusion Temperature of Biomass Ashes, XXXIII CIOSTA - CIGR V Conference, 2009., Reggio Calabria (Italy) “Technology and management to ensure sustainable agriculture, agro-systems, forestry and safety”
- 24Deepa M, Surendra S, Satya P. Corrosion problems in incinerators and biomass fuel-fired boilers. Int J Corros. 2014; 2014:505306.
- 25Drescher U, Bruggemann D. Fluid selection for the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) in biomass power and heat plants. Appl Therm Eng. 2007; 27: 223-228.
- 26Angelino G, Invernizzi C. Cyclic Methylsiloxanes as working fluids for space power cycles. J Solar Energy Eng. 1993; 115(3): 130-137.
- 27Jensen, A.B., Jensen-Holm, H., Schrotter, M., Catalytic Removal of NOx, VOC and Dioxin, Pollutec Conference, Lyon, France, 17–20 October 2000..
- 28He C, Cheng J, Zhang X, Douthwaite M, Pattison S, Hao Z. Recent advances in the catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds: a review based on pollutant sorts and sources. Chem Rev. 2019; 119(7): 4471-4568.
- 29Kalina AI. Combined–cycle system with novel bottoming cycle. J Eng Gas Turbines Power. 1984; 106: 737-742.
- 30Kalina Cycle power systems in waste heat recovery applications, Global Cement Magazine, August 2012, http://www.globalcement.com/magazine/articles/721-kalina-cycle-power-systems-in-waste-heat-recovery-applications
- 31Cool-Earth Innovative Energy Technology Program website, www.meti.go.jp.
- 32McCabe WL, Thiele EW. Graphical Design of Fractionating Columns. Ind Eng Chem. 1925; 17(6): 605-611.
- 33Ponchon M. Étude Graphique de la Distillation Fractionnée. Tech Moderne. 1921; 13: 20–58.
- 34Savarit, R., Arts et Metiers, pp. 65, 142, 178, 241, 266, 307, 1922.
- 35Traybal RE. Mass-Transfer Operations. International ed. Singapore: McGraw-Hill Book Co; 1981.