Nonparametric evaluation of the first passage time of degradation processes
Narayanaswamy Balakrishnan
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Chengwei Qin
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Chengwei Qin, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorNarayanaswamy Balakrishnan
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Chengwei Qin
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
Chengwei Qin, Department of Mathematics and Statistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper discusses a nonparametric method to approximate the first passage time (FPT) distribution of the degradation processes incorporating random effects if the process type is unknown. The FPT of a degradation process is unnecessarily observed since its density function can be approximated by inverting the empirical Laplace transform using the empirical saddlepoint method. The empirical Laplace transform is composed of the measured increments of the degradation processes. To evaluate the performance of the proposed method, the approximated FPT is compared with the theoretical FPT assuming a true underlying process. The nonparametric method discussed in this paper is shown to possess the comparatively small relative errors in the simulation study and performs well to capture the heterogeneity in the practical data analysis. To justify the fitting results, the goodness-of-fit tests including Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and Cramér-von Mises test are conducted, and subsequently, a bootstrap confidence interval is constructed in terms of the 90th percentile of the FPT distribution.
REFERENCES
- 1Ye ZS, Xie M. Stochastic modelling and analysis of degradation for highly reliable products. Appl Stoch Model Bus Ind. 2015; 31(1): 16-32.
- 2Yang Y, Klutke GA. Lifetime-characteristic and inspection-schemes for Lévy degradation processes. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2000; 49: 377-382.
- 3Shu Y, Feng Q, Coit D. Life distribution analysis based on Lévy subordinators for degradation with random jumps. Nav Res Logist. 2015; 62: 483-492.
- 4Eliazar I, Klafter J. On the first passage of one-sided Lévy motions. Physica A. 2004; 336: 219-244.
- 5Veillette M, Taqqu MS. Numerical computation of first-passage times of increasing Lévy processes. Methodol Comput Appl Probab. 2010; 12: 695-729.
- 6Todorov V, Tauchen G. Inverse realized Laplace transforms for nonparametric volatility density estimation in jump-diffusions. J Am Stat Assoc. 2012; 107: 622-635.
- 7Daniels H. Saddlepoint approximations in statistics. Ann Math Stat. 1954; 25(4): 631-650.
- 8Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Saddlepoint approximation in resampling methods. Biometrika. 1988; 75: 417-431.
- 9Reid N. Saddlepoint methods and statistical inference. Stat Sci. 1988; 3: 213-227.
10.1214/ss/1177012906 Google Scholar
- 10Butler RW, Bronson DA. Bootstrapping survival times in stochastic systems by using saddlepoint approximations. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 2002; 64(1): 31-49.
10.1111/1467-9868.00323 Google Scholar
- 11Ye L. Saddlepoint approximations for subordinator process. J Stat Comput Simul. 2016; 86(11): 2053-2072.
- 12Jiang J, Knight J. Estimation of continuous-time processes via the empirical characteristic function. J Bus Econ Stat. 2002; 20(2): 198-212.
- 13Gugushvili S. Nonparametric estimation of the characteristic triplet of a discretely observed Lévy process. J Nonparametr Stat. 2009; 21(3): 321-343.
- 14Neumann M, Reiß M. Nonparametric estimation for Lévy processes from low-frequency observations. Bernoulli. 2009; 15(1): 223-248.
- 15Comte F, Genon-Catalot V. Nonparametric adaptive estimation for pure jump Lévy processes. Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (B) Probab Stat. 2010; 46(3): 595-617.
10.1214/09-AIHP323 Google Scholar
- 16Jing B, Kong X, Liu Z. Modelling high-frequency financial data by pure jump processes. Ann Stat. 2012; 40(2): 759-784.
- 17Kappus J. Adaptive nonparametric estimation for Lévy processes observed at low frequency. Stoch Process Appl. 2014; 124: 730-758.
- 18Belomestny D. Statistical inference for time-changed Lévy processes via composite characteristic function estimation. Ann Stat. 2011; 39(4): 2205-2242.
- 19Birnbaum ZW, Saunders SC. A new family of life distribution. J Appl Probab. 1969a; 6: 319-327.
- 20Birnbaum ZW, Saunders SC. Estimation for a family of life distribution with applications to fatigue. J Appl Probab. 1969b; 6: 327-347.
- 21Balakrishnan N, Leiva V, Sanhueza A, Cabrera E. Mixture inverse Gaussian distribution and its transformations, moments and applications. Statistics. 2009; 43: 91-104.
- 22Park C, Padgett W. Accelerated degradation models for failure based on geometric Brownian motion and gamma processes. Lifetime Data Anal. 2005; 11: 511-527.
- 23Applebaum D. Lévy Processes and Stochastic Calculus. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
10.1017/CBO9780511755323 Google Scholar
- 24Valsa J, Brančik L. Approximate formulae for numerical inversion of Laplace transforms. Int J Numer Model. 1998; 11: 153-166.
- 25Feuerverger A. On the empirical saddlepoint approximation. Biometrika. 1989; 76(3): 457-464.
- 26Smith WL. On the cumulants of renewal processes. Biometrika. 1959; 46: 1-29.
- 27Bertoin J, van Harn K, Steutel FW. Renewal theory and level passage by subordinators. Stat Probab Lett. 1999; 45: 65-69.
- 28Lageras AN. A renewal-process type expression for the moments of inverse subordinators. J Appl Probab. 2005; 42: 1134-1144.
- 29Tsai CC, Tseng ST, Balakrishnan N. Mis-specification analyses of gamma and Wiener degradation processes. J Stat Plan Infer. 2011; 141: 3725-3735.
- 30Whitmore GA. Normal-gamma mixture of inverse Gaussian distributions. Scand J Stat. 1986; 13: 211-220.
- 31Wang X. Wiener processes with random effects for degradation data. J Multivar Anal. 2010; 101: 340-351.
- 32Lawless J, Crowder M. Covariates and random effects in a gamma process model with application to degradation and failure. Lifetime Data Anal. 2004; 10: 213-227.
- 33Tsai CC, Tseng ST, Balakrishnan N. Optimal design for degradation tests based on gamma processes with random effects. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2012; 61(2): 604-613.
- 34Peng CY. Inverse Gaussian processes with random effects and explanatory variables for degradation data. Technometrics. 2015; 57(1): 100-111.
- 35Meeker WQ, Escobar LA. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1998.
- 36Chen P, Ye ZS. Random effects models for aggregate lifetime data. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2016; 66(1): 76-83.
- 37Wang X, Xu D. An inverse Gaussian process model for degradation data. Technometrics. 2010; 52(2): 188-197.
- 38Ye ZS, Chen N. The inverse Gaussian process as a degradation model. Technometrics. 2014; 56(3): 302-311.
- 39Kececioglu DB. Reliability & Life Testing Handbook. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1993.
- 40Efron B. Nonparametric standard errors and confidence intervals. Can J Stat. 1981; 9: 139-172.
10.2307/3314608 Google Scholar
- 41Giorgio M, Guida M, Pulcini G. A new class of Markovian processes for deteriorating units with state dependent increments and covariates. IEEE Trans Reliab. 2015; 64(2): 562-578.
- 42Dodge Y, Rousson V. The complications of the fourth central moment. Am Stat. 1999; 53: 267-269.
- 43Zhang L. Sample mean and sample variance: their covariance and their (in)dependence. Am Stat. 2007; 61: 159-160.