Volume 37, Issue 3 pp. 248-263

Rebuilding the Tower of Babel: A Revised Nomenclature for the Study of Suicide and Suicidal Behaviors Part 1: Background, Rationale, and Methodology

Morton M. Silverman MD

Corresponding Author

Morton M. Silverman MD

Clinical Associate Professor of Psychiatry at the University of Chicago, Senior Advisor to the Suicide Prevention Resource Center (Newton, MA), and Educational Consultant to the Denver VA VISN 19 MIRECC

4858 S. Dorchester Avenue, Chicago, IL. 601615–2012; E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Alan L. Berman PhD

Alan L. Berman PhD

Executive Director of the American Association of Suicidology

Search for more papers by this author
Nels D. Sanddal MS

Nels D. Sanddal MS

President and CEO of Critical Illness and Trauma Foundation, Inc., Bozeman, MT

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick W. O'Carroll MD, MPH

Patrick W. O'Carroll MD, MPH

Regional Health Administrator, Public Health Region X

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas E. Joiner Jr. PhD

Thomas E. Joiner Jr. PhD

Bright-Burton Professor of Psychology at The Florida State University.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 December 2010
Citations: 387

This effort was initially encouraged and supported, in part, by the Suicide Prevention Research Center (SPRC) at the University of Nevada School of Medicine, Las Vegas, Nevada. Principal investigators were G. Thomas Shires, MD, and John Fildes, MD. The Denver VA VISN 19 MIRECC sponsored a meeting of the MIRECC Nomenclature Workgroup in July, 2005, which resulted in the preparation of this revision. The Director of the Denver VA VISN 19 MIRECC is Lawrence E. Adler, MD. The contents of this article are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the Denver VA VISN 19 MIRECC.

Earlier drafts were read by David A. Jobes, PhD, Herbert Nagamoto, MD, and Pamela J. Staves, RN, MS, NP. The co-authors appreciate their contributions, critiques, and recommendations.

Abstract

Since the publication of the O'Carroll et al. (1996) nomenclature for suicidology, there have been a number of published letters and articles, as well as an active e-mail dialogue, in response to, and elaborating upon, this effort to establish a standard nomenclature for suicidology. This new nomenclature has been presented on a number of occasions at both national and international meetings. In this paper we provide the background, rationale, and methodology involved in the process of revising the O'Carroll et al. nomenclature, based on the feedback and discussions that have ensued over the past 10 years.

Those who have written and studied the phenomenon of suicide have not defined the term so simply … how the word is defined has implications and large effects for statistics that are compiled on the official number of suicides, and for researchers, so that there is clear communication regarding what and who is being studied.

Among writers in the field of suicidology there is no single common accepted definition … the term suicide refers not to a single action but more broadly to a great many varied behaviors. For example, one can speak of suicidal thoughts, intentions, ideation, gestures, attempts, completions, equivalents.

Thus far, no single term, definition, or taxonomy has served to sufficiently represent the complex set of behaviors that have been suggested as suicidal. A standard set of terms and definitions are greatly needed to advance the science of suicidology and aid communication and understanding of the field.

McIntosh (1985, pp. 18–19)

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.