Volume 32, Issue 1 pp. 74-79
Original Article-Clinical Science

Effect of hydrocolloid dressings on preventing air leakage when applying negative pressure wound therapy to the perineum, buttocks, and sacrococcygeal region

Chao Wang MD

Chao Wang MD

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Rui Li MD

Rui Li MD

Department of Emergency, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Xiangpeng Su MM

Xiangpeng Su MM

Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Jixun Zhang MD

Jixun Zhang MD

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zhenzhong Liu MD

Corresponding Author

Zhenzhong Liu MD

Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China

Correspondence

Zhenzhong Liu, Department of Burn and Plastic Surgery, The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250033, China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 December 2023

Chao Wang and Rui Li contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Maintaining a vacuum when applying negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) is the key to its function, which is a challenge in the perineum, buttocks, and sacrococcygeal region. A retrospective cohort study was conducted to assess the effect of hydrocolloid dressings on preventing air leakage when applying NPWT in these regions. There were 61 patients in Group A (without the aid of hydrocolloid dressings) and 65 patients in Group B (with the aid of hydrocolloid dressings). The hydrocolloid dressing-assisted NPWT significantly reduced the incidence of air leakage compared with conventional NPWT placement (24.6% vs. 7.7%; risk ratio, 3.20; 95% confidence interval, 1.24–8.27; p = 0.009), while decreasing the number of open NPWT applications (2.2 vs. 1.7; difference, 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.66; p < 0.001), shortening hospital stays (20.1 vs. 16.1; difference, 4.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.68–6.46; p = 0.01), and reducing the incidence of adverse skin events (18.0% vs. 4.6%; risk ratio, 3.91; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–13.34; p = 0.017). These findings support the routine use of hydrocolloid dressing-assisted NPWT placement in the perineum, buttocks, and sacrococcygeal region.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.