Volume 29, Issue 1 pp. 20-33
Original Research-Clinical Science

Negative-pressure wound therapy for III/IV pressure injuries: A meta-analysis

Yi-Ping Song MSc

Yi-Ping Song MSc

School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Lei Wang MSc

Lei Wang MSc

Information Department, The Third People's Hospital of Nantong, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Bao-Fang Yuan BD

Bao-Fang Yuan BD

Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Hong-Wu Shen BD

Hong-Wu Shen BD

Nursing Department, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P. R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Lin Du MSc

Lin Du MSc

School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Ji-Yu Cai MSc

Ji-Yu Cai MSc

School of Medicine, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China

Search for more papers by this author
Hong-Lin Chen MSc

Corresponding Author

Hong-Lin Chen MSc

School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China

Correspondence

Hong-Lin Chen, School of Public Health, Nantong University, Nantong, Jiangsu, P.R. China.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 September 2020
Citations: 18

Funding information: Social and People's Livelihood Technology in Nantong city-General Project, Grant/Award Number: MS12019038

Abstract

This meta-analysis was conducted to identify the potential benefits and the efficacy of negative-pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for III/IV pressure injuries (PIs) compared with standard wound care (SWC). Sixteen RCTs with 629 patients were included in our analysis. The methodological quality was assessed by the Cochrane Collaboration Tool. The outcomes included complete ulcer healing rate, wound healing time, pain score, the frequency of dressing change, hospitalization cost, the condition of the exudate, and the wound improvement. The percentage of healing rate was 61.45% for the NPWT group and 36.90% for SWC (95% CI: 1.32-1.70). There were significant differences in wound healing time (WMD = −16.47 days, 95% [CI (−22.36, − 10.59) days, P ≤ .001]). The pain score and hospitalization cost in NPWT was lower compared with SWC group (WMD = −2.39, 95% CI [−3.47, −1.30], P ≤ .001); (SMD = −2.55, 95% CI [−4.07, −1.03], P < .01). The frequency of dressing change in both NPWT groups was greatly reduced (SMD = −3.61, 95% [CI (−4.57, − 2.66) times, P ≤ .001]). Our meta-analysis indicated that NPWT was associated with greater improvements in improving PIs and shorting healing time for III/IV PIs. However, this conclusion needs to be confirmed by high-quality multicenter RCTs.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there was no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.