Volume 62, Issue 6 pp. 1208-1217
TRANSFUSION COMPLICATIONS

Cost-effectiveness of pathogen reduction technology for plasma and platelets in Québec: A focus on potential emerging pathogens

Yves Grégoire

Yves Grégoire

Medical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Québec city, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Gilles Delage

Gilles Delage

Héma-Québec, Quebec City, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Custer

Brian Custer

Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California, USA

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Samuel Rochette

Samuel Rochette

Héma-Québec, Quebec City, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Christian Renaud

Christian Renaud

Héma-Québec, Quebec City, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Antoine Lewin

Antoine Lewin

Héma-Québec, Quebec City, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Marc Germain

Corresponding Author

Marc Germain

Medical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, Québec city, Canada

Correspondence

Marc Germain, Medical Affairs and Innovation, Héma-Québec, 1070 avenue des Sciences-de-la-vie, Québec city, QC G1V 5C3, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 13 May 2022
Citations: 4

Abstract

Background

The last economic evaluation of pathogen reduction technology (PRT) in Canada was conducted in 2007. We reassessed the cost-effectiveness of PRT in the province of Québec (which has its own blood supplier) and included an evaluation of the potential impact of emerging pathogens on cost-effectiveness.

Study Design and Methods

Decision analytic Markov models were developed to simulate the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) associated with PRT as an addition to existing safety measures for plasma and platelet products (except for bacterial culture). Models accounted for several infectious and noninfectious transfusion reactions, recipients' productivity losses ensuing from these reactions, and the impact of PRT on platelet function. Scenario analyses were conducted to evaluate the impact of a new highly contagious human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-like or West Nile virus (WNV)-like pathogen, assuming various epidemiological scenarios.

Results

In the base case, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of PRT was estimated at $8,088,974/QALY gained. Assuming the presence of an HIV-like pathogen, the ICER was $265,209/QALY gained in the “average transmission” scenario, $1,274,445/QALY gained in the “rapid testing scenario,” and $123,063/QALY gained in the “highly contagious” scenario. Assuming the presence of a WNV-like pathogen, the ICER was $7,469,167/QALY gained in the “average transmission” scenario and $6,652,769/QALY gained in the “highly contagious” scenario.

Conclusion

The cost-effectiveness of PRT may substantially improve in the event of a new, blood-borne pathogen. Given their significant impact on cost-effectiveness, the emergence of new pathogens should be considered when deciding whether to adopt PRT.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.