Volume 62, Issue 6 pp. 1230-1239
BLOOD DONORS & BLOOD COLLECTION

Improving donor retention following a temporary deferral: A cluster randomized controlled trial of deferral educational materials

Carley N. Gemelli

Corresponding Author

Carley N. Gemelli

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia

Correspondence

Carley N. Gemelli, Level 3, 417 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sarah P. Kruse

Sarah P. Kruse

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Amanda Thijsen

Amanda Thijsen

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Nina Van Dyke

Nina Van Dyke

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia

Mitchell Institute for Education and Health Policy, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Surendra Karki

Surendra Karki

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Sydney, Australia

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Tanya E. Davison

Tanya E. Davison

Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Melbourne, Australia

Monash Art Design and Architecture, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 May 2022
Citations: 4

Funding information: Australian governments fund Australian Red Cross Lifeblood for the provision of blood, blood products and services to the Australian community

Abstract

Background

Providing educational materials to deferred donors has been shown to increase their understanding about their deferral and knowledge about their return. The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of educational materials in increasing the retention of deferred donors.

Study Design and Methods

A three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted, with the following conditions: (a) Incenter Brochure plus Email; (b) Email Only; (c) Control. The Incenter Brochure plus Email condition also included a guided conversation led by staff at the point of deferral. Donors were followed up for 3 months after their deferral had ended to determine if they had attempted to donate.

Results

Compared with the Control condition, donors in the Incenter Brochure plus Email condition had increased odds of return at 3 months after their deferral ended (OR: 1.16; 95% CI 1.00–1.33). Subgroup analysis highlighted that novice (OR: 1.38; 95% CI 1.04–1.83) and established donors (OR: 1.36; 95% CI 1.13–1.64) had increased odds of return if they received the incenter materials. Donors who were deferred to maintain their well-being (OR: 1.28; 95% CI 1.03–1.60) and donors with a prior deferral history (OR: 1.55; 95% CI 1.15–1.55) had increased odds of return if they received the incenter materials. No significant differences were found between the Email Only and Control conditions.

Discussion

This trial demonstrates the benefits of providing onsite educational materials to donors at the point of deferral. This is a simple, effective strategy to increase the return behavior of donors within 3 months of their deferral ending.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.