Volume 59, Issue 7 pp. 2334-2343
BLOOD DONORS AND BLOOD COLLECTION

Does deferral for high-risk behaviors improve the safety of the blood supply?

Thelma T. Gonçalez

Corresponding Author

Thelma T. Gonçalez

Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California

Address reprint requests to: Thelma T. Gonçalez, Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, CA; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Ester C. Sabino

Ester C. Sabino

Instituto de Medicina Tropical e Departamento de Moléstias Infecciosas e Parasitárias da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Zhanna Kaidarova

Zhanna Kaidarova

Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Barbara F. Carneiro-Proietti

Anna Barbara F. Carneiro-Proietti

Fundação Hemominas/Hemocentro de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Carolina Miranda

Carolina Miranda

Fundação Hemominas/Hemocentro de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Paula Loureiro

Paula Loureiro

Fundação Hemope/Hemocentro de Pernambuco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Pernambuco University, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Maria Esther Lopes

Maria Esther Lopes

Fundação Hemorio/Hemocentro do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Cesar de Almeida-Neto

Cesar de Almeida-Neto

Fundação Pro-Sangue/ Hemocentro de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Disciplina Ciências Médicas, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
Karen S. Schlumpf

Karen S. Schlumpf

George Washington University, Washington, DC

Search for more papers by this author
David J. Wright

David J. Wright

Westat, Inc., Rockville, Maryland

Search for more papers by this author
Edward L. Murphy

Edward L. Murphy

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
Brian Custer

Brian Custer

Vitalant Research Institute, San Francisco, California

Department of Laboratory Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California

Search for more papers by this author
for the NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), International Component, Brazil

for the NHLBI Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study-II (REDS-II), International Component, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 April 2019
Citations: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Predonation donor deferral is used to select donors with presumed lower risk for transfused transmitted infections. The contribution to blood safety from this practice has not been reported previously for Brazil.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

At four large Brazilian blood centers from September 2010 to March 2011, donors who were deferred due to responses on eligibility questions were invited to provide a blood sample to test for HIV, hepatitis C virus, hepatitis B virus, human T-lymphotropic virus, syphilis, and Trypanosoma cruzi and complete an audio computer-assisted structured interview on risk behaviors.

RESULTS

Of 299,848 potential donors during the study period, 66,870 were deferred with 10,453 (15.6%) for high-risk behaviors. Of those, 4860 (46.5%) were consecutively approached and 4013 (82.5%) participated. Disclosed risk behaviors by audio computer-assisted structured interview included 4 or more sexual partners in the past 12 months (15.0% of females [F] and 34.5% of males [M]), unprotected sex (62.0% F and 44.0% M), other high-risk sexual exposure (85.0% F and 73.0% M), being a person who injects drugs (3.0% F and 10.0% M), and test-seeking (17.0% F and 22.0% M). Eleven percent of deferred males reported male-to-male sex. Individuals who reported other high-risk sexual exposure, sexual partner risk, or male-to-male sex had the highest frequency of confirmed HIV: 1.2, 0.7, and 0.7%, respectively. Individuals who reported male-to-male sex, sexual partner risk, test seeking, and unprotected sex had the highest frequency of confirmed syphilis: 3.8, 3.3, 2.4, and 2.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Donor deferral deters donation by individuals with risk behaviors and elevated rates of infectious disease markers.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have disclosed no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.