Volume 54, Issue 5 pp. 1321-1331
BLOOD COMPONENTS

Paired analysis of plasma proteins and coagulant capacity after treatment with three methods of pathogen reduction

José Coene

Corresponding Author

José Coene

Blood Service, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Belgium, Belgium

Address reprint requests to: José Coene, Rode Kruis–Vlaanderen, Dienst voor het Bloed, Ottergemsesteenweg 413, B-9000 Gent, Belgium; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Katrien Devreese

Katrien Devreese

Transfusion Research Center, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Belgium, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Bea Sabot

Bea Sabot

Blood Service, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Belgium, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Hendrik B. Feys

Hendrik B. Feys

Coagulation Laboratory, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Philippe Vandekerckhove

Philippe Vandekerckhove

Blood Service, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Belgium, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
Veerle Compernolle

Veerle Compernolle

Blood Service, Belgian Red Cross-Flanders, Belgium, Belgium

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 October 2013
Citations: 20

Abstract

Background

The effect of photochemical pathogen reduction (PR) methods on plasma quality has been the subject of several reports but solid comparative data for the different technologies are lacking.

Study Design and Methods

Plasma (n = 24) photoinactivated with methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or amotosalen (AS) was compared using a pool-and-split design. Samples were taken before and after treatment with each method and tested for coagulation factors (fibrinogen, Factor [F] II, FV, FVIII, F IX, FXI), natural coagulation inhibitors (Protein C [PC], protein S [PS], antithrombin III [AT]), prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and thrombin generation (TG). The three methods were mutually compared by repeated-measures analysis of variance.

Results

All three PR methods cause significant reduction (p < 0.01) of activity of the procoagulant proteins fibrinogen, FII, FV, FVIII, F IX, and FXI. Coagulation is also affected, with significant changes in PT, APTT, and TG. RF treatment causes a significantly higher decrease in concentration of coagulation factors, PS, and AT than the other methods (p < 0.01). PT, APTT, and TG are also affected most by RF treatment. FII, FVIII, F IX, PC, AT, and PT are best preserved with the MB method and FV, FXI, and TG after AS treatment (p < 0.01). Coagulation factor loss due to the volume loss during PR treatment is more important for MB and AS than for RF.

Conclusion

PR treatment of plasma affects coagulation proteins and coagulant capacity. For the RF method this effect is most pronounced, although to some extent compensated by a smaller volume loss.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.