Volume 25, Issue 5 pp. 612-617
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Validation of a novel smartphone application-enabled, patient-operated skin barrier device

Erin E. Grinich

Erin E. Grinich

School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
Anuja V. Shah

Anuja V. Shah

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Search for more papers by this author
Eric L. Simpson

Corresponding Author

Eric L. Simpson

Department of Dermatology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon

Correspondence

Eric L. Simpson, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 April 2019
Citations: 20

Abstract

Background

Transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and surface capacitance measure skin barrier permeability and stratum corneum (SC) hydration, respectively, and are frequently utilized in atopic dermatitis clinical trials. Many barrier devices are costly and often used only in the academic setting. GPSkin is a low-cost, patient-operated device that measures both TEWL and SC hydration. This study aimed to test the reliability of GPSkin and assess its correlation with current industry standards.

Materials and Methods

GPSkin was compared to the Biox AquaFlux (TEWL) and Courage-Khazaka Corneometer (SC hydration). Participants with healthy skin (n = 50) collected measurements with GPSkin in Trial 1 without any device education and in Trial 2 with additional instruction. In Trial 2, the investigator also performed measurements with GPSkin. Spearman's coefficients (rs) were performed to assess device correlation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated to determine reliability.

Results

Overall, GPSkin was moderately correlated with current industry device measurements for TEWL (Trial 1 rs:0.48; Trial 2 rs:0.40 participant, 0.34 investigator) and SC hydration (Trial 1 rs:0.63; Trial 2 rs:0.45). GPSkin demonstrated “good” test-retest reliability for both TEWL (ICC: 0.89) and SC hydration (ICC: 0.85) measurements when participants were provided with some device education. There was no difference in reliability between participants provided with device education and investigators.

Conclusion

Based on these findings, we concluded that GPSkin provides reasonably precise and reliable measurements of SC hydration and TEWL as compared to current devices.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

GPower provided devices for this study and reimbursement for international conference attendance and presentation for author EE Grinich.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.