Volume 71, Issue 2 e70011
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Do the Wealthy Underreport Their Income? Using General Election Filings to Study the Income–Wealth Relationship in India

Ram Singh

Corresponding Author

Ram Singh

Delhi School of Economics, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Delhi School of Public Policy and Governance, University of Delhi, Delhi, India

Correspondence:

Ram Singh ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 March 2025

Funding: This work was supported by the IoE, University of Delhi, grant no. IoE/062/Grants-Schools/2022-2023 and the Indian Council of Social Science Research (ICSSR), grant no. 02/68/GN/2021-22/ICSSR/RP/MJ.

ABSTRACT

To examine the income-reporting behavior of individuals and households across wealth groups in India, we use new and publicly available information in election filings, along with Forbes' list and income tax data. We find that the wealthier a household is, the smaller the income it reports relative to its wealth. On average, a 1% increase in family wealth is associated with a more than 0.6% decrease in the reported income–wealth ratio. The income–wealth ratios for individuals exhibit very similar patterns. We show that tax avoidance is an important factor behind the abnormally low capital income reported by the top wealth groups. We use the national income accounts to estimate the capital income missing from tax returns. We find the average return on capital in India to be 7.2%. In contrast, the total income reported by the wealthiest 0.1% of families is only about a fifth of the returns from their capital. For the Forbes-listed 100 families, an even higher fraction of capital income goes unreported. We demonstrate how the missing income makes the tax regime regressive with respect to wealth and results in an underestimate of inequality. Finally, we show that women report relatively less income, and individuals exposed to greater media and civil society scrutiny report relatively high incomes.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.