REGULAR ARTICLE
How do mutual recognition agreements influence trade?
Yong Joon Jang,
Corresponding Author
Yong Joon Jang
Kyung Hee University, Korea
Correspondence
Department of International Business and Trade, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorYong Joon Jang,
Corresponding Author
Yong Joon Jang
Kyung Hee University, Korea
Correspondence
Department of International Business and Trade, Kyung Hee University, 26 Kyungheedae-ro, Hoegi-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul, South Korea.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
This paper empirically tests how the magnitude of trade promotion effects of mutual recognition agreements (MRAs) varies with various mediums. The main rationale for the research is that because an MRA eliminates technical barriers to trade (TBT), the trade promotion effects of MRAs are inversely much stronger if TBT originally restricted trade before their entry into force. Using data on MRAs and international trade in 34 countries and 22 manufacturing sectors covering 1995 to 2009, the paper empirically shows that the trade promotion effects of MRAs can be much stronger, depending on the type of contract, time period after the entry into force, components of exports, and country and industry characteristics such as technology level and global competitiveness. The results will provide insight for policy makers and stakeholders who cooperate with foreign countries in various regulations, especially in developing countries that have low levels of technology, competitiveness, and regulatory governance capacity.
REFERENCES
- Akhtar, S., & Jones, V. (2014). Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations (CRS Report No. 43387). Washington D.C.: U.S. Congressional Research Service.
- Amurgo-Pacheco, A. (2007). Mutual recognition agreements and trade diversion: Consequences for developing nations, IHEID Working Papers 20-2006, Economics Section, The Graduate Institute of International Studies, Geneva.
- Anderson, J. (1979). A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. American Economic Review, 69(1), 106–116.
- Balassa, B. (1965). Trade liberalization and “revealed” comparative advantage. Manchester School of Economics and Social Studies, 33(2), 92–123.
10.1111/j.1467-9957.1965.tb00050.x Google Scholar
- Baldwin, R. (2000). Regulatory protectionism, developing nations and a two-tier world trade system (CEPR Discussion Papers No. 2574). London: Centre for Economic Policy Research.
10.1353/btf.2000.0001 Google Scholar
- Baller, S. (2007). Trade effects of regional standards liberalization: A heterogeneous firms approach (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4124). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
10.1596/1813-9450-4124 Google Scholar
- Bao, X., & Chen, W. (2013). The impacts of technical barriers to trade on different components of international trade. Review of Development Economics, 17(3), 447–460.
- Bao, X., & Qiu, L. (2012). How do technical barriers to trade influence trade? Review of International Economics, 20(4), 691–706.
- Bernard, A., Jensen, J., & Schott, P. (2009). Importers, exporter and multinationals: A portrait of firms in the U.S. that trade goods. In T. Dunne, J. B. Jensen, & M. J. Roberts (Eds.), Producer dynamics: New evidence from micro data (pp. 513–552). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press/Cambridge, MA: NBER.
10.7208/chicago/9780226172576.003.0015 Google Scholar
- Besedes, T. & Prusa, T. J. (2011). The role of extensive and intensive margins and export growth. Journal of Development Economics, 96(2), 371–379.
- Brenton, P., Sheehy, J., & Vancauteren, M. (2001). Technical barriers to trade in the European Union: Importance for accession countries. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(2), 265–284.
- Caves, R., & Roberts, M. (1975). Regulating the product: Quality and variety. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
- Chen, M., & Mattoo, A. (2008). Regionalism in standards: Good or bad for trade. Canadian Journal of Economics, 41(3), 838–863.
- Chen, M., Otsuki, T., & Wilson, J. (2006). Do standards matter for export success? (World Bank Policy Research Center Working Paper No. 3809). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
- De Hoyos, R., & Iacovone, L. (2011). Economic performance under NAFTA: A firm-level analysis of the trade–productivity linkage (Policy Research Working Paper No. 5661). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
10.1596/1813-9450-5661 Google Scholar
- Deardorff, A. V., & Stern, R. M. (2008). Measurement of non-tariff barriers. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
- Disdier, A., Fontagne, L., & Mimouni, M. (2008). The impact of regulations on agricultural trade: Evidence from the SPS and TBT agreements. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 90(2), 336–350.
- Essaji, A. (2008). Technical regulations and specialization in international trade. Journal of International Economics, 76(2), 166–176.
- Fliess, B., & Schonfeld, R. (2006). Trends in conformity assessment practices and barriers to trade: Final report on survey of CABs and exporters (OECD Trade Policy Paper No. 37). Paris: OECD.
10.1787/317107062148 Google Scholar
- Gray, H. & Martin, J. (1980). The Meaning and Measurement of Product Differentiation in International Trade. Review of World Economics, 116(2).
- Goldberg, P., Khandelwal, A., Pavcnik, N., & Topalova, P. (2010). Imported intermediate inputs and domestic product growth: Evidence from India. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(4), 1727–1767.
- Hatzichronoglou, T. (1997). Revision of the high-technology sector and product classification (OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Paper No. 1997/02). Paris: OECD.
10.1787/134337307632 Google Scholar
- Helpman, E., Melitz, M., & Rubinstein, Y. (2008). Estimating trade flows: Trading partners and trading volumes. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(2), 441–487.
- Jang, Y. (2013). Mutual recognition agreements and the proximity–concentration trade-off between foreign direct investment and export. Journal of World Trade, 47(4), 783–812.
- Johnson, C. (2008). Technical barriers to trade: Reducing the impact of conformity assessment measures (USITC Working Paper No. ID-19). Washington, D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission.
- Johnson, C., & Kriz, D. (1998). Global assessment of standards barriers to trade in the information technology industry (USITC Publication No. 3141). Washington, D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission.
- Johnson, C., & Sykes, H. (2007). Medical devices and equipment: Competitive conditions affecting U.S. trade in Japan and other principal foreign markets (USITC Publication No. 3909). Washington, D.C.: U.S. International Trade Commission.
- Maskus, K., Wilson, J., & Otsuki, T. (2000). Quantifying the impact of technical barriers to trade (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 2512). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
- Melitz, M. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725.
- Moenius, J. (2004). Information versus product adaptation: The role of standards in trade (International Business and Markets Research Center Working Paper). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.
- Moulton, B. (1990). An illustration of a pitfall in estimating the effects of aggregate variables on micro units. Review of Economics and Statistics, 72(2), 334–338.
- Nam, S. (2002). Competition and complementarity in Northeast Asian Trade: Korea's perspective (KIEP Working Paper No. 200-02). Seoul, South Korea: Korea Institute for International Economic Policy.
- OECD (2013). International regulatory co-operation: Addressing global challenges. Paris: OECD.
10.1787/9789264200463-5-en Google Scholar
- OECD (2014). International regulatory co-operation and international organisations: The cases of the OECD and the IMO. Paris: OECD.
10.1787/9789264225756-en Google Scholar
- Otsuki, T., Wilson, J., & Sewadeh, M. (2001). Saving two in a billion: Quantifying the trade effect of European food safety standards in African exports. Food Policy, 26(5), 495–514.
- Portugal-Perez, A., Reyes, J., & Wilson, J. (2010). Beyond the information technology agreement: Harmonization of standards and trade in electronics. The World Economy, 33(12), 1870–1897.
- Sanchez, G., Alzua, M., & Butler, I. (2006). Impact of technical barriers to trade on Argentine exports (CEDLAS Working Paper). La Plata, Argentina: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.
- Santana, R., & Jackson, L. (2012). Identifying non-tariff barriers: Evolution of multilateral instruments and evidence from the disputes (1948–2011). World Trade Review, 11(3), 462–478.
- Shepherd, B. (2007). Product standards, harmonization, and trade: Evidence from the extensive margin (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 4390). Washington, D.C.: World Bank.
10.1596/1813-9450-4390 Google Scholar
- Song, H., & Chen, K. (2010). Trade effects and compliance costs of food safety regulations: The Case of China. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1, 429–438.
10.1016/j.aaspro.2010.09.054 Google Scholar
- Swann, P., Temple, P., & Shurmer, M. (1996). Standards and trade performance: The UK experience. Economic Journal, 106(438), 1297–1313.
- Thilmany, D., & Barrett, C. (1997). Regulatory barriers in an integrating world food market. Review of Agricultural Economics, 19(1), 91–107.
10.2307/1349680 Google Scholar
- USITC (2014). Trade barriers that U.S. medium-sized enterprises perceive as affecting exports to the European Union. Investigation No. 332-541, USITC Publication 4455.
- WTO (2014). Report on G-20 Trade Measures (Mid-May 2014 to Mid-October 2014). Washimngton, D.C.: World Trade Organization.
- Yilmazkuday, D., & Yilmazkuday, H. (2014). Bilateral versus multilateral free trade agreements: A welfare analysis. Review of International Economics, 22(3), 423–638.
