Clinical implication of renal allograft volume to recipient body surface area ratio in pediatric renal transplant
Corresponding Author
Michael E. Chua
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
Correspondence
Michael E. Chua, Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJin Kyu Kim
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichele Gnech
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Surgery, University of Padova, Padua, Veneto, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorJessica M. Ming
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Search for more papers by this authorBisma Amir
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNicolas Fernandez
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorArmando J Lorenzo
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorWalid A. Farhat
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDiane Hebert
Department of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJoana Dos Santos
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMartin A. Koyle
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Michael E. Chua
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Institute of Urology, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City, Philippines
Correspondence
Michael E. Chua, Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJin Kyu Kim
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMichele Gnech
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Surgery, University of Padova, Padua, Veneto, Italy
Search for more papers by this authorJessica M. Ming
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Department of Surgery, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Search for more papers by this authorBisma Amir
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorNicolas Fernandez
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorArmando J Lorenzo
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorWalid A. Farhat
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorDiane Hebert
Department of Nephrology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorJoana Dos Santos
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorMartin A. Koyle
Division of Urology, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Our study aims to assess the clinical implication of RAV/rBSA ratio in PRT as a predictor for attained renal function at 1 year post-transplantation and its association with surgical complications. A retrospective cohort was performed for PRT cases from January 2000 to December 2015 in our institution. Extracted clinical information includes the recipient's demographics, donor type, renal allograft characteristics, arterial, venous and ureteral anastomoses, vascular anastomosis time while kidney off ice, overall operative time, and estimated blood loss. The RAV/rBSA was extrapolated and assessed for its association with renal graft function attained in 1 year post-transplantation and surgical complications within 30-day post-transplantation. A total of 324 PRTs cases were analyzed. The cohort consisted of 187 (52.4%) male and 137 (42.3%) female recipients, with 152 (46.9%) living donor and 172 (53.1%) deceased donor renal transplants, and an overall median age of 155.26 months (IQR 76.70-186.98) at time of renal transplantation. The receiver operating characteristic identified that a RAV/rBSA ratio of 135 was the optimal cutoff in determining the renal graft function outcome. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed the relative OR for RAV/rBSA ≥ 135 ratio in predicting an eGFR ≥ 90 attained within 1 year post-transplant was highest among younger pediatric recipients (<142.5 months) of deceased kidney donors (OR = 11.143, 95% CI = 3.156-39.34). Conversely, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that RAV/rBSA ratio ≥ 135 is associated with lower odds of having eGFR <60 (OR = 0.417, 95% CI = 0.203-0.856). The RAV/rBSA ratio was not associated nor predictive of transplant-related surgical complications. Our study determined that the RAV/rBSA ratio is predictive of renal graft function at 1-year PRT, but not associated with any increased surgical complications.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
All listed authors have substantially contributed and declared no potential conflict of interest nor direct or indirect funding associated with the work for this research project and final manuscript. The study was approved by the institutional REB.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
petr13295-sup-0001-TableS1-S2.docxWord document, 14.3 KB |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- 1Harambat J, van Stralen KJ, Kim JJ, Tizard EJ. Epidemiology of chronic kidney disease in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012; 27(3): 363-373. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-011-1939-1.
- 2Hussein AA, Shoukry AI, Fadel F, et al. Outcome of pediatric renal transplantation in urological versus non-urological causes of end stage renal disease: does it matter? J Pediatr Urol. 2018; 14(2): 166.e1-166.e7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2017.10.015.
- 3Wang CS, Gander J, Patzer RE, Greenbaum LA. Mortality and allograft loss trends among US pediatric kidney transplant recipients with and without focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2018; 71(3): 392-398. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.09.025.
- 4Winnicki E, McCulloch CE, Mitsnefes MM, Furth SL, Warady BA, Ku E. Use of the kidney failure risk equation to determine the risk of progression to end-stage renal disease in children with chronic kidney disease. JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172(2): 174-180. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.4083.
- 5Van Arendonk KJ, Boyarsky BJ, Orandi BJ, et al. National trends over 25 years in pediatric kidney transplant outcomes. Pediatrics. 2014; 133(4): 594-601. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2013-2775.
- 6Parker WF, Ross LF, Richard Thistlethwaite J, Jr GA. Impact of the kidney allocation system on young pediatric recipients. Clin Transplant. 2018; 32(4): e13223https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.13223.
- 7Chavers BM, Rheault MN, Matas AJ, et al. Improved outcomes of kidney transplantation in infants (Age < 2 years): a single-center experience. Transplantation. 2018; 102(2): 284-290. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001929.
- 8Groothoff JW, Offringa M, Grootenhuis M, Jager KJ. Long-term consequences of renal insufficiency in children: lessons learned from the Dutch LERIC study. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017; 33(4): 552-560https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfx190.
- 9Moudgil A, Martz K, Stablein DM, Puliyanda DP. Variables affecting estimated glomerular filtration rate after renal transplantation in children: a NAPRTCS data analysis. Pediatr Transplant. 2010; 14(2): 288-294. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2009.01222.x.
- 10Muscheites J, Wigger M, Drueckler E, et al. Estimated one-yr glomerular filtration rate is an excellent predictor of long-term graft survival in pediatric first kidney transplants. Pediatr Transplant. 2009; 13(3): 365-370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2008.00976.x.
- 11Hugen CM, Polcari AJ, Farooq AV, Fitzgerald MP, Holt DR, Milner JE. Size does matter: donor renal volume predicts recipient function following live donor renal transplantation. J Urol. 2011; 185(2): 605-609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2010.09.098.
- 12Lee CK, Yoon YE, Choi KH, et al. Clinical implications for graft function of a new equation model for the ratio of living donor kidney volume to recipient body surface area. Korean J Urol. 2013; 54(12): 870-875. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.12.870.
- 13Lee JH, Won JH, Oh CK. Impact of the ratio of graft kidney volume to recipient body surface area on graft function after live donor kidney transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2011; 25(6): E647-E655. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-0012.2011.01502.x.
- 14Rodricks N, Chanchlani R, Banh T, et al. Incidence and risk factors of early surgical complications in young renal transplant recipients: a persistent challenge. Pediatr Transplant. 2017; 21(7): e13006. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13006.
- 15Mosteller RD. Simplified calculation of body-surface area. N Engl J Med. 1987; 317(17): 1098.
- 16Schwartz GJ, Munoz A, Schneider MF, et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009; 20: 629-637.
- 17Myers GL, Miller WG, Coresh J, et al. Recommendations for improving serum creatinine measurement: a report from the Laboratory Working Group of the National Kidney Disease Education Program. Clin Chem. 2006; 52: 5-18.
- 18Harraz AM, Shokeir AA, Soliman SA, et al. Toward a standardized system for reporting surgical outcome of pediatric and adolescent live donor renal allotransplantation. J Urol. 2012; 187(3): 1041-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2011.10.161.
- 19Chua ME, Ming JM, Carter S, et al. Impact of adjuvant urinary diversion versus valve ablation alone on progression from chronic to end stage renal disease in posterior urethral valves: a single institution 15-Year time-to-event analysis. J Urol. 2018; 199: 824-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.10.024.
- 20Dziura JD, Post LA, Zhao Q, Fu Z, Peduzzi P. Strategies for dealing with missing data in clinical trials: from design to analysis. Yale J Biol Med. 2013; 86(3): 343-358.
- 21 IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.
- 22Špatenka J, Seeman T, Foltynová E, et al. Effect of donor/recipient body weight ratio, donor weight, recipient weight and donor age on kidney graft function in children. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012; 27(2): 820-824. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfr319.
- 23Feltran Lde S, Nogueira PC, Ajzen SA, Verrastro CG, Pacheco-Silva A. Does graft mass impact on pediatric kidney transplant outcomes? Pediatr Nephrol. 2014; 29(2): 297-304.
- 24Smith JM, Martz K, Blydt-Hansen TD. Pediatric kidney transplant practice patterns and outcome benchmarks, 1987-2010: a report of the North American Pediatric Renal Trials and Collaborative Studies. Pediatr Transplant. 2013; 17(2): 149-157. https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.12034.
- 25Sarwal MM, Cecka JM, Millan MT, Salvatierra Jr O. Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United network for organ sharing. Transplantation. 2000; 70(12): 1728-1736.
- 26García-Covarrubias L, Pliego C, Bermudez L, et al. Correlation of allograft weight to recipient body weight index on renal function in kidney transplantation. Transplant Proc. 2016; 48(2): 578-582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2016.02.015.
- 27Ponticelli C. Ischaemia-reperfusion injury: a major protagonist in kidney transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014; 29(6): 1134-1140. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gft488.
- 28Chinnakotla S, Verghese P, Chavers B, et al. Outcomes and risk factors for graft loss: lessons learned from 1,056 pediatric kidney transplants at the University of Minnesota. J Am Coll Surg. 2017; 224(4): 473-486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.12.027.
- 29Kaboré R, Couchoud C, Macher MA, et al. Age-dependent risk of graft failure in young kidney transplant recipients. Transplantation. 2017; 101(6): 1327-1335. https://doi.org/10.1097/TP.0000000000001372.
- 30Bisigniano L, López-Rivera A, Tagliafichi V, Fernández V, Soratti C. Factors associated with patient and graft survival using kidneys from cadaveric donors in transplant patients under 18 years of age in Argentina. Transplant Proc. 2012; 44(7): 2235-2238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.07.127.
- 31Donati-Bourne J, Roberts HW, Coleman RA. Donor-recipient size mismatch in paediatric renal transplantation. J Transplant. 2014; 2014: 317574. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/317574.
- 32Singh A, Stablein D, Tejani A. Risk factors for vascular thrombosis in pediatric renal transplantation: a special report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study. Transplantation. 1997; 63(9): 1263-1267.
- 33Jalanko H, Mattila I, Holmberg C. Renal transplantation in infants. Pediatr Nephrol. 2016; 31(5): 725-735. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-015-3144-0.
- 34Gholami S, Sarwal MM, Naesens M, et al. Standardizing resistive indices in healthy pediatric transplant recipients of adult-sized kidneys. Pediatr Transplant. 2010; 14: 126-131.
- 35Goldsmith PJ, Asthana S, Fitzpatrick M, et al. Transplantation of adult-sized kidneys in low-weight pediatric recipients achieves short-term outcomes comparable to size-matched grafts. Pediatr Transplant. 2010; 14(7): 919-924. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3046.2010.01375.x.
- 36Salvatierra Jr O, Millan M, Concepcion W. Pediatric renal transplantation with considerations for successful outcomes. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2006; 15(3): 208-217.
- 37Shokeir AA, Osman Y, Ali-El-Dein B, El-Husseini A, El-Mekresh M, Shehab-El-Din AB. Surgical complications in live-donor pediatric and adolescent renal transplantation: study of risk factors. Pediatr Transplant. 2005; 9(1): 33-38.
- 38Sanusi AA, Arogundade FA, Famurewa OC, et al. Relationship of ultrasonographically determined kidney volume with measured GFR, calculated creatinine clearance and other parameters in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2009; 24(5): 1690-1694. https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfp055.
- 39Janki S, Kimenai HJAN, Dijkshoorn ML, Looman CWN, , IJzermans JNM. Validation of ultrasonographic kidney volume measurements: a reliable imaging modality. Exp Clin Transplant. 2018; 16(1): 16-22. https://doi.org/10.6002/ect.2016.0272.
- 40Mancini M, Mainenti PP, Speranza A, et al. Accuracy of sonographic volume measurements of kidney transplant. J Clin Ultrasound. 2006; 34(4): 184-189.
- 41Paleologo G, Abdelkawy H, Barsotti M, et al. Kidney dimensions at sonography are correlated with glomerular filtration rate in renal transplant recipients and in kidney donors. Transplant Proc. 2007; 39(6): 1779-1781.
- 42Donadio C, Abdelkawy H, Grassi G. Echographic renal dimensions can predict glomerular filtration rate of potential living kidney donors. Transplant Proc. 2010; 42(4): 1035-1039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.transproceed.2010.03.039.