Volume 34, Issue 11 e14411
TECHNICAL NOTE

Automated extraction of anorectal pressures from high-resolution manometry reports

Mohamed ElWazir

Mohamed ElWazir

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Suez Canal University, Ismailia, Egypt

Search for more papers by this author
Misha Gautam

Misha Gautam

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Rahul Mishra

Rahul Mishra

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas R. Oblizajek

Nicholas R. Oblizajek

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
John W. (William) Blackett

John W. (William) Blackett

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Adil E. Bharucha

Corresponding Author

Adil E. Bharucha

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence

Adil E. Bharucha, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 May 2022

Funding information

This study was supported by National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases Grant R01 DK78924.

Mohamed ElWazir and Misha Gautam contributed equally to the manuscript.

Abstract

Background

During high-resolution anorectal manometry (HR_ARM), the raw data are converted into software-derived summary variables (e.g., rectoanal gradient during evacuation) that capture only a snapshot of the data collected during HR_ARM and are less useful than newer indices, which are also derived from the raw data, for diagnosing defecatory disorders (DD). However, it is cumbersome and time-consuming to extract raw data from the program and calculate such indices. This study aimed to devise a user-friendly approach to extract anorectal pressures measured with HR_ARM.

Methods

Anorectal pressures at rest, during anal squeeze, and evacuation were measured with HR_ARM in 180 women, among whom 60 each were healthy, had DD, or fecal incontinence. A reverse engineering approach extracted pressure values from color images in HR_ARM reports. The summary variables generated by the software and a reverse engineering approach were compared with Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), paired t-tests, and Bland–Altman's tests.

Results

Anorectal pressures summarized by the software and a reverse engineering method were highly concordant for anal resting (CCC [95% CI], 0.98 [0.97, 0.99]) and squeeze pressures (0.99 [0.99, 0.99) and the rectoanal gradient during evacuation with an empty (0.98 [0.97, 0.98]) and a filled balloon (0.99 [0.99, 0.99]). For most variables, the paired t and Bland–Altman comparisons were not significant.

Conclusions

Anorectal pressures can be accurately determined from pressure topography images in HR_ARM reports. In future, this reverse engineering approach can be harnessed to compile large HR_ARM datasets across centers and to uncover newer, potentially more useful summary rectoanal pressure variables.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.