Volume 28, Issue 4 pp. 526-544
LITERATURE REVIEW

Barriers and facilitators to early mobilisation programmes in the paediatric intensive care unit: A scoping literature review

Chelsea E. Noone MSN, RN, CCNS, CCRN-K

Corresponding Author

Chelsea E. Noone MSN, RN, CCNS, CCRN-K

PhD candidate

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Correspondence

Chelsea E. Noone, School of Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, 2 Koret Way, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Linda S. Franck RN, PhD, FAAN

Linda S. Franck RN, PhD, FAAN

Professor

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Sandra L. Staveski PhD RN, CPNP-AC, FAAN

Sandra L. Staveski PhD RN, CPNP-AC, FAAN

Assistant Professor

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Roberta S. Rehm RN, PhD, FAAN

Roberta S. Rehm RN, PhD, FAAN

Professor Emeritus

Department of Family Health Care Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 February 2023
Citations: 1

Abstract

Background

Early mobilisation (EM) in paediatric intensive care units (PICU) is safe and feasible. Nurses, patients and family caregivers are integral to EM. Understanding their perspectives is necessary to implement and sustain EM for children in the PICU.

Aim

To identify and critique research literature on the perspectives of nurses, patients and families regarding EM in the PICU.

Study design

For this scoping review, PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched. Included studies reported experiences of PICU nurses, caregivers and patients. Outcomes included feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, benefits, facilitators, barriers, concerns, comfort with participation, and experiences and knowledge of EM. Exclusion criteria were: studies with preterm infants, other paediatric settings, review articles and editorials, studies of non-mobility interventions or chest physiotherapy alone. Quality assessment tools for qualitative and quantitative designs were used.

Results

Nine studies met the inclusion criteria: six quantitative and three qualitative studies. Six themes were identified: nurses' responses, concerns about patient risk factors and adverse events, equipment and staffing resources, family/caregivers' responses, patients' perspectives and overall impact.

Conclusions

Findings demonstrate the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to address cultural, psychological and practical issues with EM. Unvalidated surveys conducted at single time points were used to measure nurses' perspectives. EM presents opportunities and challenges for family caregivers. Patients' experiences of EM are underrepresented in published research.

Relevance to clinical practice

Nurses and family caregivers are instrumental in EM in the PICU. Positive attitudes and competence are essential to PICU EM programme's success. Barriers may be minimized when programme benefits are understood.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

There are no conflicts of interest for the contributing authors. This is an unfunded, student research.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.