Volume 27, Issue 3 pp. 334-340
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT INITIATIVES-SERVICE IMPROVEMENT

Family satisfaction in a neuro trauma ICU

Matthew J. Peterson BS

Matthew J. Peterson BS

Medical student

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Theo Woerhle MS

Theo Woerhle MS

Research and Evaluation Specialist

Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Melissa Harry PhD, MSW

Melissa Harry PhD, MSW

Research Scientist

Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Anna Mae C. Heger BS

Anna Mae C. Heger BS

Research Project Coordinator

Essentia Institute of Rural Health, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mary Gerchman-Smith APRN

Mary Gerchman-Smith APRN

Critical Care Clinical Nurse Specialist

Essentia Health St. Mary's Medical Center, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Linda Vogel APRN

Linda Vogel APRN

Trauma Clinical Nurse Specialist, Trauma Program Manager

Essentia Health St. Mary's Medical Center, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Carolyn Hughes MSN, RN-BC

Carolyn Hughes MSN, RN-BC

Clinical Education, Patient Education Manager

Essentia Health St. Mary's Medical Center, Duluth, Minnesota, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Catherine McCarty PhD, MPH, MSB

Corresponding Author

Catherine McCarty PhD, MPH, MSB

Associate Dean

University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA

Correspondence

Catherine McCarty, Associate Dean, University of Minnesota Medical School, 219 Medical School, 1035 University Drive, Duluth, MN 55812, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 December 2020
Citations: 2

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this quality improvement initiative was to evaluate satisfaction of family members of patients in a neuro trauma ICU (NTICU).

Methods

Adult patients (age 18+) admitted to the NTICU for at least 24 hours between June 2017 and November 2018 were identified. Near or at the time of discharge from the NTICU, the health unit coordinator or registered nurse identified the family member who was either the next-of-kin, surrogate decision-maker, or person who had been most frequently present at the patient's bedside. This person was provided a packet containing a letter of consent and the Critical Care Family Satisfaction Survey (CCFSS).

Results

Surveys were completed by 78 family members, the majority of whom were the wife of the patient (n = 35, 44%), 60 years and older (n = 48, 60.8%). Fifty-seven percent of patients (n = 45) were in the ICU less than 3 days and 59% (n = 47) of medical events were injury-related. Total CCFSS scores ranged from 69 to 100 (median 95). The item with the largest number of dissatisfied responses was “Noise level in the critical care unit” (n = 4, 5.3% not satisfied). Open-ended question comments were primarily positive (n = 60, 66%), with 32% (n = 29) representing areas for improvement.

Conclusions

Results of this satisfaction survey have been disseminated to leadership and have been taken into consideration in the planning of a new hospital building currently being built, including ICU patient rooms that allow for more privacy and reduced noise, and more comfortable family rooms.

Relevance to Clinical Practice

Family members are a very useful source of feedback for ICU care. Several concerns identified by family members in this study are likely to be relevant to other sites. These included: communication between health care providers and family about patient status, noise in the ICU, peaceful waiting areas for family, and slow transfers.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.