Volume 57, Issue 12 pp. 1971-1975
Original Article

Urinary incontinence during laughter in children: Is it giggle incontinence?

Soe T San

Soe T San

Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Elizabeth H Barnes

Elizabeth H Barnes

National Health and Medical Research Council Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
Patrina H Y Caldwell

Corresponding Author

Patrina H Y Caldwell

Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Westmead), Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Correspondence: Associate Professor Patrina HY Caldwell, Discipline of Child and Adolescent Health, University of Sydney, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network (Westmead), Locked Bag 4001, Westmead, NSW 2145, Australia. Fax: +61 29845 3038; email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 June 2021
Citations: 2

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Abstract

Aim

Giggle incontinence is a distinct entity of childhood daytime urinary incontinence (DUI), where children wet themselves only when they laugh. The prevalence of true giggle incontinence is unknown, with confusion about the diagnosis of urinary incontinence occurring during laughter and true giggle incontinence. The aim of the study is to improve our understanding of urinary incontinence during laughter by comparing those children with children who have DUI at other times, but not with laughter.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective medical record review of children with DUI who presented to a tertiary continence service from 2017 to 2018, collecting data on age, gender, associated comorbidities, lower urinary tract symptoms, investigations, provisional diagnosis at first visit and initial treatment responses. Differences between those with DUI occurring during laughter and those with DUI at other times, but not with laughter were compared using standard statistical methods.

Results

Of the 277 new patients seen during the study period, 140 (51%) had DUI, and of these, 72 (51%) had DUI occurring during laughter. Children with incontinence occurring during laughter were more likely to have incontinence associated with other activities. One child had giggle incontinence according to the International Children's Continence Society's definition. Four other children were referred specifically for urinary incontinence associated with laughter, with the term giggle incontinence sometimes used by the referring doctor.

Conclusion

Children with DUI commonly experience incontinence during laughter, but true giggle incontinence is rare. Correct diagnosis is essential as it directs treatment.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.