Modified Treatment in Brain Ischemia 2b Stopped or Continued After First-Pass Mechanical Thrombectomy for M1 Occlusions
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
ABSTRACT
Background and Purpose
The superiority of achieving modified Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (mTICI) from multiple passes versus mTICI 2b from a single pass remains uncertain. We aimed to assess whether additional passes in M1 occlusion patients with a first-pass mTICI 2b score improved clinical and functional outcomes.
Methods
We analyzed Registry Combined vs. Single Thrombectomy Techniques registry data of consecutive M1-occlusion patients, comparing outcomes of those with mTICI 2b-stopped after the first pass versus continued mechanical thrombectomy (MT) to improve angiographic results (mTICI 2b or mTICI 2c/3). We compared demographic, clinical, angiographic, and clinical outcome data (National Institute of Health Stroke Scale [NIHSS] at 24 h and modified Rankin Scale at 3 months).
Results
Patients with first-pass mTICI 2b had lower NIHSS scores at admission, fewer left-side occlusions, and longer last-seen-well times. Endovascular techniques and time from groin puncture to revascularization were similar across groups. Patients with final mTICI 2c/3 had the highest distal embolism rates in a new territory (0% for mTICI2b-stopped vs. 3% for final mTICI2b-continued; 7.7% for final mTICI2c/3; p = 0.02). The groups had similar rates of death, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, same-area distal embolism, other MT-related complications, NIHSS at 24 h, NIHSS change from admission to 24 h, and same-territory distal embolism.
Conclusion
Achieving mTICI 2b after the first pass in M1-occlusion patients proved relevant. These patients had comparable clinical and functional outcomes and a lower risk of new territory distal embolisms compared to those with final mTICI 2c/3 scores.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
