Volume 31, Issue 3 pp. 560-568
Clinical Investigative Study

Voxel-based morphometry for the evaluation of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy with apparently normal MRI

Sofía González-Ortiz

Corresponding Author

Sofía González-Ortiz

Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Epilpsy Reserach Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

Correspondence

Sofía González-Ortiz, Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Passeig Maritim 25–29, 08003 Barcelona, Spain.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Santiago Medrano

Santiago Medrano

Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Jaume Capellades

Jaume Capellades

Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Marta Vilas

Marta Vilas

Radiology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Antoni Mestre

Antoni Mestre

Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Trueta, Girona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Laura Serrano

Laura Serrano

Neurosurgery Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Gerardo Conesa

Gerardo Conesa

Neurosurgery Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Epilpsy Reserach Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Carmen Pérez-Enríquez

Carmen Pérez-Enríquez

Neurology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Epilpsy Reserach Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Montserrat Arumi

Montserrat Arumi

Anatomic Pathology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Nuria Bargalló

Nuria Bargalló

Centre de Diagnosi per la Imatge, Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Ignacio Delgado-Martinez

Ignacio Delgado-Martinez

Neurosurgery Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Epilpsy Reserach Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
Rodrigo Rocamora

Rodrigo Rocamora

Neurology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Epilpsy Reserach Group, Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mèdiques, Barcelona, Spain

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 05 April 2021
Citations: 7

Abstract

Background and purpose

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is essential in the diagnosis of pharmacoresistant epilepsy (PRE), because patients with lesions detected by MRI have a better prognosis after surgery. Focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) is one of the most frequent etiologies of PRE but can be difficult to identify by MRI. Voxel-based morphometric analysis programs, like the Morphometric Analysis Program (MAP), have been developed to help improve MRI detection. Our objective was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of MAP in patients with PRE and an apparently normal MRI.

Methods

We studied 70 patients with focal PRE and a nonlesional MRI. The 3DT1 sequence was processed with MAP, obtaining three z-score maps. Patients were classified as MAP+ if one or more z-score maps showed a suspicious area of brightness, and MAP– if the z-score maps did not show any suspicious areas. For MAP+ cases, a second-look MRI was performed with a dedicated inspection based on the MAP findings. The MAP results were correlated with the epileptogenic zone. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated.

Results

Thirty-one percent of patients were classified as MAP+ and 69% were MAP–. Results showed a sensitivity of 0.57, specificity of 0.8, PPV of 0.91, and NPV of 0.35. In 19% of patients, an FCD was found in the second-look MRI after MAP.

Conclusions

MAP was helpful in the detection of lesions in PRE patients with a nonlesional MRI, which could have important repercussions for the clinical management and postoperative prognosis of these patients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.