Volume 62, Issue 8 pp. 719-729
Original Manuscript

The validity and reliability of the Functional Strength Measurement (FSM) in children with intellectual disabilities

W. F. M. Aertssen

Corresponding Author

W. F. M. Aertssen

Avans+, University for Professionals, Breda, The Netherlands

Correspondence: Ms. Wendy Aertssen, laan 1940-1945 no. 60, 4194 RH Meteren, The Netherlands (e-mail: [email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
B. Steenbergen

B. Steenbergen

Behavioural Science Institute, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

School of Psychology, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia

Search for more papers by this author
B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman

B. C. M. Smits-Engelsman

Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Division of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 07 June 2018
Citations: 11

Abstract

Background

There is lack of valid and reliable field-based tests for assessing functional strength in young children with mild intellectual disabilities (IDs).

Aim

The aim of this study was to investigate the test–retest reliability and construct validity of the Functional Strength Measurement in children with ID (FSM-ID).

Method

Fifty-two children with mild ID (40 boys and 12 girls, mean age 8.48 years, SD = 1.48) were tested with the FSM. Test–retest reliability (n = 32) was examined by a two-way interclass correlation coefficient for agreement (ICC 2.1A). Standard error of measurement and smallest detectable change were calculated. Construct validity was determined by calculating correlations between the FSM-ID and handheld dynamometry (HHD) (convergent validity), FSM-ID, FSM-ID and subtest strength of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency – second edition (BOT-2) (convergent validity) and the FSM-ID and balance subtest of the BOT-2 (discriminant validity).

Results

Test–retest reliability ICC ranged 0.89–0.98. Correlation between the items of the FSM-ID and HHD ranged 0.39–0.79 and between FSM-ID and BOT-2 (strength items) 0.41–0.80. Correlation between items of the FSM-ID and BOT-2 (balance items) ranged 0.41–0.70.

Conclusion

The FSM-ID showed good test–retest reliability and good convergent validity with the HHD and BOT-2 subtest strength. The correlations assessing discriminant validity were higher than expected. Poor levels of postural control and core stability in children with mild IDs may be the underlying factor of those higher correlations.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.