Volume 9, Issue 4 e12362
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Influence of the position of the antrostomy in sinus floor elevation assessed with cone-beam computed tomography: A randomized clinical trial

Shunsuke Kawakami

Shunsuke Kawakami

Department of Oral Implantology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan

ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Niklaus P. Lang

Niklaus P. Lang

University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland

Center for Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Takahisa Iida

Takahisa Iida

Department of Oral Implantology, Osaka Dental University, Osaka, Japan

ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Mauro Ferri

Mauro Ferri

ARDEC Foundation, Cartagena de Indias, Bolívar, Colombia

Rafael Núñez University Corporation, Bolívar, Colombia

Search for more papers by this author
Karol A. Apaza Alccayhuaman

Karol A. Apaza Alccayhuaman

ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Daniele Botticelli

Corresponding Author

Daniele Botticelli

ARDEC Academy, Rimini, Italy

Correspondence Dr Daniele Botticelli, Rafael Núñez University Corporation, Bolívar, Colombia Email: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 August 2018
Citations: 30

Abstract

Aim

The aim of the present study was to evaluate dimensional variations of augmented sinus volumes after sinus floor elevation using a lateral approach placing the antrostomy close to the sinus floor or more cranially to it.

Methods

Twenty-four healthy volunteers in need of sinus floor elevation were included in the study. The lateral approach was adopted placing the antrostomy randomly either close to the level of the sinus floor (group A) or approximately 3-4 mm cranially (group B). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was done before surgery (T0) and after 1 week (T1) and 9 months (T2), and analyses on dimensional variations were performed.

Results

CBCT of 10 patients per group were analyzed. At T1, the sinus floor was found to be elevated by 9.8 ± 2.1 mm in group A and 10.9 ± 1.9 mm in group B. At T2, shrinkage of 2.0 ± 1.7 mm in group A and 1.4 ± 2.5 mm in group B was observed. The area was reduced approximately 18-24% between T1 and T2. The sinus mucosa width increased by 4.3-5 mm between T0 and T1, and regained the original dimensions at T2.

Conclusions

The more cranial the antrostomy, the greater the augmentation height after 9 months.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.