Volume 34, Issue 5 pp. 830-836
Meta Analysis and Systematic Review

The benefit of adding oral simethicone in bowel preparation regimen for the detection of colon adenoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Jen-Hao Yeh

Jen-Hao Yeh

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Da-Chung Branch, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Ming-Hung Hsu

Ming-Hung Hsu

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Chao-Ming Tseng

Chao-Ming Tseng

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Tzu-Haw Chen

Tzu-Haw Chen

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Ru-Yi Huang

Ru-Yi Huang

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Family Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Ching-Tai Lee

Ching-Tai Lee

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Chi-Wei Lin

Chi-Wei Lin

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Family Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Search for more papers by this author
Wen-Lun Wang

Corresponding Author

Wen-Lun Wang

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, E-DA Hospital/I-shou University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan

Correspondence

Dr Wen-Lun Wang, Department of Internal Medicine, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, No. 1, Yida Road, Jiaosu Village, Yanchao District, Kaohsiung 82445, Taiwan.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 October 2018
Citations: 22
Declaration of conflict of interest: The authors declare no financial relationship with any company involved in this study. There is no conflict of interest involved in this submission.
Author contribution: Dr Jen-Hao Yeh performed the database search, review of articles, statistical analysis, and wrote the manuscript. Dr Ming-Hung Hsu was responsible for article review. Dr Jau-Ming Tseng and Dr Tzu-Haw Chen also performed database searches. Dr Ching-Tai Lee reviewed the analyzed data and gave suggestions for manuscript writing. Dr Ru-Yi Huang and Chi-Wei Lin gave suggestions and refined the statistical methodology. Dr Wen-Lun Wang designed the study and revised the manuscript critically. All authors approved the final version of the article, including the authorship list.

Abstract

Background and Aim

Simethicone is an anti-foaming agent commonly used during colonoscopy. Although several randomized trials have shown that oral simethicone in the bowel preparation regimen may improve bowel cleanness, whether it improves adenoma detection rate (ADR) or polyp detection rate remains undetermined. The aim of this study was to determine if oral simethicone in bowel preparation regimen before colonoscopy improves the ADR.

Methods

A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, SDOL, Cochrane Library, and ProQuest databases through December 2017. Randomized controlled trials that compared bowel preparation regimens with simethicone versus those without it were included. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and underwent meta-analysis using appropriate models. The primary outcomes were ADR and polyp detection rate, and secondary outcomes included bowel preparation, bubble score, and withdrawal time.

Results

Twelve published randomized controlled studies with 6003 participants were included for meta-analysis. There was no difference in the overall ADR (pooled risk ratio = 1.06, 95% confidence interval = 0.91–1.24) and right-side ADR (risk ratio = 1.50, 95% confidence interval = 0.82–2.75) between the groups with or without simethicone. However, the addition of simethicone improved adenoma detected per patient (2.20 ± 1.36 vs 1.63 ± 0.89) according to one of the included studies. Meta-regression revealed that the baseline ADR < 25% of the included studies was associated with significant benefit of oral simethicone; the number needed to treat was 15.

Conclusions

The adjunction of oral simethicone significantly improved bowel preparation quality and might benefit adenoma detection in specific settings with low baseline ADR.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.