Volume 31, Issue 4 e70058
ORIGINAL PAPER
Open Access

Evaluation of Future Nurses' Beliefs and Fears About Pain: A Descriptive and Correlational Study

Kamile Kırca

Corresponding Author

Kamile Kırca

Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Correspondence: Kamile Kırca ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Hüsna Özveren

Hüsna Özveren

Nursing Department, Faculty of Health Sciences, Kırıkkale University, Kırıkkale, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Tuba Karabey

Tuba Karabey

Department of Emergency Aid and Disaster Management, Faculty of Health Sciences, Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 May 2025

ABSTRACT

Background

How nurses manage pain and their decisions to treat it depend on their attitudes, beliefs, and misconceptions about pain. Therefore, the first step to promoting positive behaviour change in nurses is to determine their attitudes, beliefs, fears, knowledge, and behaviour towards pain management. Nurses with negative or false beliefs about pain are likely to provide inadequate pain management and care. Nursing students are the nurses of tomorrow who will play a key role in pain management and treatment. This study aimed to evaluate nursing students' beliefs and fears about pain.

Methods

This descriptive and correlational study was carried out on 342 nursing students of a university in Türkiye. Data were collected using an individual information form, the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III (FPQ-III), and the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ).

Results

The mean scores of the participants from FPQ-III, Severe Pain, Minor Pain, Medical Pain subscales were 83.71 ± 19.14, 32.54 ± 7.97, 24.48 ± 6.89 and 26.68 ± 7.92, respectively. The participants' mean scores on the Organic Beliefs and Psychological Beliefs subscales were 3.50 ± 0.72 and 4.60 ± 0.96, respectively. There was a positive correlation between FPQ-III and PBQ scores. The psychological belief subscale explained only 2.1% of the total change in the fear of pain score (R2 = 0.021, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Participants had high ‘psychological beliefs’ and ‘severe pain’ scores. It may be recommended to use interactive education methods such as case-based teaching for students to learn effective methods of coping with pain and realise their own beliefs and attitudes. Establishing simulation laboratories where students can experience all pain-related processes is also important in gaining knowledge and skills on pain management.

1 Introduction

Pain is a multidimensional experience with psychological, behavioural, emotional, and cognitive consequences and an increasingly prevalent health problem that is generally undertreated [1, 2]. Pain is considered the fifth vital sign because everyone experiences it at some point [3]. Pain management requires comprehensive evaluation. Healthcare professionals with more pain knowledge and beliefs will likely manage pain better and make the right clinical decisions [4, 5]. Pain assessment requires a team effort, and nurses are an indispensable part of that team [6]. What distinguishes nurses from other healthcare professionals in pain management is that they spend a long time with patients [7]. Nurses identify patients' pain experiences and methods of coping with it, plan and administer treatment, monitor the effects and outcomes of treatment, sympathise with their patients, use non-pharmacological methods, and resort to therapeutic communication [3, 8, 9].

Comprehensive pain assessment ensures optimal pain management [10]. Cognitive, emotional, behavioural, environmental, cultural, religious, and gender factors affect pain management approaches. One of those factors is pain beliefs [11-13]. Pain beliefs are either organic or psychological. Organic beliefs are beliefs that pain has physiological origins, such as injury, harm, and so forth [14]. People believe that the more injured they are the more pain they experience. Therefore, organic pain management is based on biomedical principles involving activity/exercise to eliminate the factors causing pain. Psychological beliefs are beliefs that pain is of psychological origins, such as anxiety, depression, and so forth. Therefore, psychological pain management involves distraction techniques and relaxation exercises [15-17].

What approach patients adopt to pain and how they manage it depends not only on their experiences, beliefs, and cultural codes but also on the perceived level of pain. Fear of pain results from perceived pain and the bodily damage caused by it, which makes patients believe that they should avoid pain-causing activities [18, 19]. Therefore, pain and fear are inseparable. Pain causes fear, making the patient more sensitive to pain [20-22].

Nurses develop patient-specific coping strategies after identifying pain beliefs and their impact on the way patients cope with pain [11, 23]. The personal characteristics of patients and nurses and the meaning they attribute to pain are vital factors affecting pain management. The success of pain treatment depends on nurses' attitudes toward pain [8, 9]. How nurses manage pain and their decisions to treat it depend on their attitudes, beliefs, and misconceptions about pain. Therefore, the first step to promoting positive behaviour change in nurses is to determine their attitudes, beliefs, fears, knowledge, and behaviour towards pain management. Nurses with negative or false beliefs about pain are likely to provide inadequate pain management and care [24, 25]. Conversely, nurses who reconsider their attitudes, feelings, and beliefs about pain will likely provide better care [8]. Therefore, nurses interested in providing effective care should identify patients' and their own pain beliefs.

Nursing students are the nurses of tomorrow who will play a key role in pain management and treatment. Given that pain beliefs are an indispensable part of quality care, nursing students should recognise their own pain beliefs and fears to provide quality care for patients in pain. However, little published research investigates pain beliefs and fear of pain in nurses who spend a great deal of time with patients with chronic or acute pain [11]. Therefore, this paper investigated nursing students' beliefs and fears of pain. We also think that it will pave the way for further research.

2 Methods

2.1 Study Design

This was a descriptive and correlational study, and data collection was conducted between March and June of 2020.

2.2 Participants and Setting

The study population consisted of 434 nursing students studying in the nursing department of a university in Türkiye. No sample selection was made in the study and it was aimed to reach all students. The majority (n = 342; 78.80%) of the study population agreed to participate.

The inclusion criteria were (1) volunteering to participate in the study, (2) being a nursing student, (3) being 18 years or older, (4) giving written and verbal consent, and (5) being literate in Turkish. The exclusion criteria were (1) not volunteering to participate in the study, (2) not being a nursing student, (3) being under the age of 18, and (4) having communication difficulties and difficulty understanding questionnaire forms.

In the undergraduate nursing curriculum in Türkiye, pain management is usually covered in several different courses. Nursing students are taught the physiopathology, assessment and management strategies of pain, especially in courses such as Fundamentals of Nursing, Internal Medicine Nursing and Surgical Nursing. Psychological and social dimensions of pain and patient education are also emphasised in the curriculum. However, as in the university where the study was conducted, some universities allocate a special area to pain by adding elective courses such as ‘Oncology Nursing’ and ‘Palliative Care’ to their curricula. In addition, pain assessment methods and appropriate intervention techniques are demonstrated to students in Clinical Practices and Professional Skills Laboratories courses. In general, pain is included in theoretical and practical courses, and it is aimed for students to gain competence in this subject. In Türkiye, the importance given to pain in the nursing curriculum is increasing to improve nurses' knowledge and skills in pain management. Still, the practices' diversity and level of elaboration may vary among universities.

2.3 Data Collection

The data were collected using an individual information form, the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III (FPQ)-III, and the Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ). The data were collected in collaboration with academics at participants' convenience in their classrooms. Before data collection, participants were informed of the study and the questionnaires. They completed the questionnaires independently and submitted them after completion. Data collection took 15–20 min.

2.3.1 Individual Information Form

The individual information form was prepared by the researchers based on previous literature and included 31 questions aimed at garnering data on the students' socio-demographic characteristics (age, gender, marital status, etc.) and pain experience (perceived health status, frequency of pain experience, pain site, pain severity, the impact of pain on quality of life, using painkillers for pain relief, non-pharmacological pain relief measures, believing in the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief, knowledge of pain management, interest in training on pain, etc.) [4, 8, 11, 12, 25, 26].

2.3.2 FPQ-III

The FPQ-III was developed by McNeil and Rainwater [27] to assess fear and/or anxiety about pain. It presents eight painful situations and consists of 30 items scored on a five-point Likert-type scale (1 = ‘Not at All’, 2 = ‘A little’, 3 = ‘A Fair Amount’, 4 = ‘Very Much’, 5 = ‘Extreme’). Respondents mark the options that best describe the severity of fear they experience when confronted with those painful situations. They are also asked to rate the fear they would likely experience if confronted with those painful situations. Therefore, the questionnaire can assess the severity of fear respondents have experienced or would experience if they were in those situations. The questionnaire consists of three subscales: Severe pain (Items 1, 3, 5, 6, 9, 10, 13, 18, 25, and 27), minor pain (Items 2, 4, 7, 12, 19, 22, 23, 24, 28, and 30), and medical pain (Items 8, 11, 14, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 26, and 29). There are no reverse-scored items. The total score ranges from 30 to 150. The total score of each subscale ranges from 10 to 50 (30, 38). The questionnaire was adapted to Turkish by Ünver and Turan [20]. The original version has a Cronbach's α of 0.92 (total), 0.88 (severe pain), 0.87 (minor pain), and 0.87 (medical pain) (Ünver & Turan 2018). We found the Cronbach's α of the total scale and ‘severe pain’, ‘minor pain’ and ‘medical pain’ subscales to be 0.88 and 0.80, 0.82, and 0.85, respectively.

2.3.3 PBQ

The PBQ was developed by Edwards et al. [28] and adapted to Turkish by Sertel Berk [29]. Researchers argue that the belief that the cause of chronic pain is related to uncontrollable external-organic factors also negatively affects the effectiveness of treatments. They mention that the most important purpose of developing the scale is to understand chronic pain patients' psychological and organic attributions to the origin of pain, which have not been investigated until then [28]. It is a 12-item measure used to assess beliefs about the cause and treatment of pain. It consists of two subscales: organic beliefs (Items 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 10, and 11) and psychological beliefs (Items 4, 6, 9, and 12). The 6-point Likert-type scale consists of options ranging from 1 ‘never’ to 6 ‘always’. The organic belief subscale indicates that pain is mostly of organic origin (e.g., ‘pain is caused by damage to tissues in the body’ and ‘pain experience is a sign of something wrong in the body’), psychological belief subscale indicates that pain experience is under the influence of psychological factors (e.g., being anxious makes the pain worse). makes it worse' and ‘thinking about the pain makes the pain worse). Higher scores indicate higher pain beliefs [28]. The scale has no cut-off point. Higher scores indicate firmer beliefs about pain. The ‘organic beliefs’ and ‘psychological beliefs’ subscales have Cronbach's α of 0.71 and 0.73, respectively [29]. In the present study, the ‘organic beliefs’ and ‘psychological beliefs’ subscales had Cronbach's α of 0.70 and 0.71, respectively.

2.4 Data Analysis

The data were analysed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS v. 22.0) at a significance level of 0.05. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, mean, standard deviation, median, and min-max) were used for analysis. The suitability of the data for normal distribution was examined with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. As a result of the analysis, it was determined that it was not suitable for normal distribution. Therefore, PBQ and FPQ-III scores were compared using nonparametric tests (the Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests). Spearmen correlation test and simple linear regression analysis were also used. In Mann−Whitney U tests, which were performed to determine between which pairs the significant differences obtained from Kruskal−Wallis H test were, Bonferroni correction was made to prevent type I error that could interfere with the measurement process.

2.5 Ethical Considerations

The study was approved by the Non-Interventional Research Ethics Committee (Decision no: 2020.01.09). Written permission was obtained from the university. Written consent was obtained from students who agreed to participate in the study. We informed them that their responses and identities would be anonymous and would not be shared with third parties.

3 Results

Participants had a mean age of 20.22 ± 1.38 years (min: 18, max: 25). A quarter of the participants were first graders (26.6%). The majority of the participants were women (86.3%) and had no family members with chronic diseases (79.2%). Half the participants rated their health status as ‘neither good nor bad’ (49.2%) (Table 1). All participants had experienced pain before. More than half the participants rarely experienced pain (66.4%), mostly headaches (54.1%). More than half the participants experienced moderate pain (64.9%). Most participants stated that pain affected their quality of life (85.7%). More than half the participants used painkillers (64.3%) and gave themselves a massage for pain relief (68.1%). Most participants believed in the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (86.5%). The majority of the participants stated that they knew how to manage pain (75.5%) and would like to receive training on pain (74.3%) (Table 1).

Table 1. Sociodemographic and pain characteristics.
Characteristics n %
Age (years) X ± SS (min−max) = 20.22 ± 1.38 (18−25)
Grade level
1 91 26.6
2 85 24.9
3 88 25.7
4 78 22.8
Gender
Woman 286 83.6
Man 56 16.4
Perceived health status
Bad 23 6.7
Neither good nor bad 168 49.2
Good 151 44.2
Family member with chronic illness
Yes 71 20.8
No 271 79.2
Pain experience
Yes 342 100
No
Frequency of pain experience
Rarely 227 66.4
Often 104 30.4
Always 11 3.2
Pain site
Headache 185 54.1
Abdominal pain 53 15.5
Backache 38 11.1
Joint pain 28 8.2
Toothache 8 2.3
Stomachache 6 1.8
Leg pain 4 1.2
Sore throat 4 1.2
Chest pain 3 0.9
Neck pain 3 0.9
Earache 2 0.6
Arm pain 1 0.3
Others 7 2.0
Pain severity
Mild 39 11.4
Moderate 222 64.9
Severe 73 21.3
Very severe 8 2.3
Impact of pain on quality of life
Yes 293 85.7
No 49 14.3
Using painkillers for pain relief
Yes 220 64.3
No 122 35.7
Non-pharmacological pain relief measures
Massaging 233 68.1
Warm compression 143 41.8
Cold compression 46 13.5
Imagery 28 8.2
Applying menthol to the skin 23 6.7
Distraction 110 32.2
Music 96 28.1
Relaxation exercises 78 22.8
Lying and resting 228 66.7
Compression wrapping 47 13.7
Praying 69 20.2
Crying 61 17.8
Reading 24 7.0
Taking a walk 25 7.3
Believing in the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief
Yes 296 86.5
No 46 13.5
Knowledge of pain management
Yes 259 75.7
No 83 24.3
Interest in training on pain
Yes 243 74.3
No 84 25.7
  • Note: Knee pain be multiplied due to more than one answer.

Participants had a mean PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ and ‘psychological beliefs’ subscale score of 3.50 ± 0.72 and 4.60 ± 0.96, respectively. They had a mean FPQ-III total score of 83.71 ± 19.14 and a mean ‘severe pain’, ‘minor pain’ and ‘medical pain’ subscale score of 32.54 ± 7.97, 24.48 ± 6.89, and 26.68 ± 7.92, respectively (Table 2).

Table 2. Distribution of PBQ and FPQ scores.
Scale Subscales Mean Min−Max
Pain Beliefs Questionnaire (PBQ) Organic beliefs 3.50 ± 0.72 (1−6)
Psychological beliefs 4.60 ± 0.96 (1−6)
Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III (FPQ-III) Severe pain 32.54 ± 7.97 (10−50)
Minor pain 24.48 ± 6.89 (10−50)
Medical pain 26.68 ± 7.92 (10−50)
Total 83.71 ± 19.14 (30−150)

Participants' PBQ ‘psychological beliefs’ subscale and FPQ total and subscale scores significantly differed by gender and grade level (p < 0.05). The reason for this difference according to grade levels in Bonferroni Adjusted Mann−Whitney U test analysis; 1st and 4th grade mean scores, 2nd grade and 4th grade, 2nd grade, and 3rd grade mean scores, and 3rd grade and 4th grade mean scores (significance level for this test, p = 0.05/6) = 0.0083) is due to the difference. Their FPQ-III total scale and ‘medical pain’ subscale scores differed by the perceived impact of pain on quality of life (p < 0.05). Their PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ and FPQ ‘severe pain’ subscale scores differed by their beliefs in the effectiveness of non-pharmacological methods for pain relief (p < 0.05). Their PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ subscale scores differed by their knowledge of pain management (p < 0.05). Their FPQ ‘severe pain’ subscale scores differed by their willingness to receive training on pain (p < 0.05) (Table 3).

Table 3. Distribution of PBQ and FPQ scores by demographic characteristics.
Demographic characteristics Organic beliefs Psychological beliefs Severe pain Minor pain Medical pain FPQ total
Gender
Woman 3.52 ± 0.69 4.66 ± 0.92 33.42 ± 7.87 24.98 ± 6.89 27.40 ± 7.84 85.81 ± 18.90
Man 3.43 ± 0.83 4.25 ± 1.06 28.08 ± 6.95 21.92 ± 6.38 22.98 ± 7.33 73.00 ± 16.73
Statistical evaluation Z = −1.417 p = 0.156 Z = −2.812 p = 0.005 Z = −4.843 p = 0.000 Z = −2.776 p = 0.005 Z = −3.389 p = 0.001 Z = −4.640 p = 0.000
Grade level
1 3.58 ± 0.74 4.67 ± 0.95 32.00 ± 8.96 23.75 ± 6.66 26.50 ± 8.22 82.26 ± 20.41
2 3.41 ± 0.59 4.77 ± 0.89 34.80 ± 8.28 26.47 ± 7.91 28.34 ± 9.07 89.61 ± 21.50
3 3.52 ± 0.69 4.71 ± 0.95 32.10 ± 7.01 22.22 ± 5.66 24.92 ± 7.04 79.25 ± 16.05
4 3.49 ± 0.84 4.19 ± 0.95 31.24 ± 6.99 25.71 ± 6.46 27.06 ± 6.80 84.02 ± 16.58
Statistical evaluation X2 = 1.376 p = 0.711 X2 = 18.311 p = 0.000 X2 = 9.923 p = 0.019 X2 = 17.869 p = 0.000 X2 = 8.174 p = 0.043 X2 = 11.173 p = 0.011
Post hoc 1−4 (p = 0.001) 2−4 (p = 0.004) 2−3 (p = 0.001) 2−3 (p = 0.001)
2−4 (p = 0.000) (p < 0.0083) 3−4 (p = 0.000) (p < 0.0083)
3−4 (p = 0.000) (p < 0.0083)
(p < 0.0083)
Impact of pain on quality of life
Yes 3.50 ± 0.71 4.63 ± 0.95 32.81 ± 7.70 24.68 ± 6.70 27.12 ± 7.61 84.62 ± 18.36
No 3.51 ± 0.75 4.41 ± 1.01 30.97 ± 9.34 23.28 ± 7.91 24.00 ± 9.19 78.26 ± 22.69
Statistical evaluation Z = −0.091 p = 0.927 Z = −1.462 p = 0.144 Z = −1.319 p = 0.187 Z = −1.344 p = 0.179 Z = −2.435 p = 0.015

Z = −2.087

p = 0.037

Using non-pharmacological methods for pain relief
Yes 3.44 ± 0.65 4.60 ± 0.93 32.97 ± 8.01 24.37 ± 7.02 26.68 ± 8.05 84.04 ± 19.57
No 3.92 ± 0.94 4.57 ± 1.11 29.85 ± 7.16 25.19 ± 6.07 26.63 ± 7.10 81.68 ± 16.20
Statistical evaluation Z = −3.401 p = 0.001 Z = −1.323 p = 0.186 Z = −2.796 p = 0.005 Z = –0.747 p = 0.455 Z = −0.012 p = 0.990

Z = −1.022

p = 0.307

Knowledge of pain management
Yes 3.45 ± 0.69 4.64 ± 0.95 32.59 ± 8.12 24.28 ± 6.98 26.47 ± 7.96 83.35 ± 19.42
No 3.67 ± 0.79 4.47 ± 0.99 32.41 ± 7.55 25.18 ± 6.62 27.43 ± 7.77 85.03 ± 18.03
Statistical evaluation Z = −2.260 p = 0.024 Z = −1.462 p = 0.144 Z = −0.640 p = 0.522 Z = −1.360 p = 0.174 Z = −0.675 p = 0.500

Z = −0.708

p = 0.479

Interest in training on pain
Yes 3.50 ± 0.68 4.66 ± 0.96 33.41 ± 7.85 24.97 ± 6.81 27.09 ± 7.89 85.49 ± 18.71
No 3.44 ± 0.74 4.44 ± 0.94 30.97 ± 8.26 23.19 ± 6.82 25.98 ± 8.04 80.15 ± 19.83
Statistical evaluation Z = −1.345 p = 0.178 Z = −1.862 p = 0.063 Z = −2.227 p = 0.026

Z = −1.644

p = 0.100

Z = −0.751

p = 0.453

Z = −1.764

p = 0.078

  • a Mann−Whitney U test.
  • b Kruskal−Wallis test.
  • c Mann−Whitney U Bonferroni correction.

There was a moderate negative correlation between Severe Pain and Organic Beliefs (r = −0.40), but this correlation was not statistically significant (p = 0.459). There was a moderate positive correlation between Severe Pain and Psychological Beliefs (r = 0.243), which was statistically highly significant (p = 0.000). There was a weak positive correlation between Minor Pain and Organic Beliefs (r = 0.178), which was statistically highly significant (p = 0.001). There was a weak positive correlation between Medical Pain and Organic Beliefs (r = 0.154), which was statistically highly significant (p = 0.004). There was a very weak positive correlation between Fear of Pain Total Score and Organic Beliefs (r = 0.120), which was statistically significantly significant (p = 0.026). There is a weak positive correlation between Fear of Pain Total Score and Psychological Beliefs (r = 0.149), and this correlation is statistically highly significant (p = 0.006) (Table 4).

Table 4. The relationship between PBQ and FPQ-III.
Spearman's rho Organic beliefs Psychological beliefs
Severe pain r −0.40 0.243
p 0.459 0.000
Minor pain r 0.178 0.006
p 0.001 0.910
Medical pain r 0.154 0.074
p 0.004 0.170
Fear of pain total score r 0.120 0.149
p 0.026 0.006
  • ** Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
  • * Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

In the simple linear regression analysis, the model was generally significant (p = 0.026). Among the independent variables, only the psychological beliefs score significantly affected the total fear of pain score. This value indicates that psychological pain beliefs explain only 2.1% of the total change in fear of pain (Table 5).

Table 5. Simple linear regression analysis for PBQ and FPQ-III.
Unstandardised coefficients Standardised coefficients
Model B Std. Error Beta (β) t p VIF
(Constant) 70.524 6.111 11.540 < 0.000
Organic beliefs −0.080 1.529 −0.003 −0.052 0.958 1.146
Psychological beliefs 2.928 1.143 0.147 2.561 0.011 1.146
Regression model summary: Dependent variable: Fear of pain total score
R2 = 0.021 R = 0.146 F = 3.705 p = 0.026 Durbin-Watson: 1.843
  • Note: p < 0.05.
  • Abbreviation: VIF, variance inflation factor.

4 Discussion

Pain management is part of quality nursing care. The primary goal of pain management is to provide quality care to all patients and use pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods to keep pain under control [6]. Personal characteristics, patient-nurse interaction, and the meaning attributed to pain are key factors affecting pain management [8, 9]. Nurses' and nursing students' beliefs and fears about pain are as important in pain management as patients' beliefs.

All participants stated that they experienced pain, mostly headaches (Table 1), which has been reported by earlier studies as well [11, 25, 30]. The higher prevalence of acute pain (headache and abdominal pain) than chronic pain in our participants may be due to anxiety and stress because they have academic requirements to fulfil, such as taking theoretical courses and studying long hours for exams, and putting theory into practice during lab activities or clinical clerkships. Usually, sudden onset, severe, and non-long-lasting pains are acute pains. Chronic pains are characterised by more than 6 months, continuing throughout life or for a long time, varying in intensity from mild to severe, affecting the quality of life of the individual, and even causing behavioural disorders in the individual [31]. The nursing students in this study were mostly healthy young people (only 6.7% responded that they have a bad health status). Therefore, they are expected to feel acute more often than chronic pain.

More than half the participants stated that they used painkillers (Table 1). Research also shows that students mostly use painkillers [30, 32]. Painkiller use was more common in our participants than reported by other studies. It is thought that students use pain relievers because they are easy to access.

Most participants preferred massaging and warm compression as non-pharmacological strategies for pain relief (Table 1). Research also shows that students give themselves a massage, apply hot/cold packs, or lie down and rest to self-manage acute pain [11, 25, 30]. Non-pharmacological methods are commonly used as complementary methods in the treatment of pain worldwide [33, 34]. Students prefer non-pharmacological strategies for pain relief because they can apply them by themselves without preparation. In addition to being easily applicable and cost-effective, non-pharmacological methods may increase their effectiveness when used together with pharmacological methods.

Participants had above-average levels of organic (3.50 ± 0.72) and psychological (4.60 ± 0.96) pain beliefs (Table 2). This result shows that most nursing students believe that pain is of psychological origin, suggesting that non-pharmacological strategies (distraction and relaxation techniques) are better options for them [35, 36]. Babadağ and Alpaslan [11] found that students had a mean PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ and ‘psychological beliefs’ subscale score of 3.46 ± 0.51 and 4.81 ± 0.76, respectively. Different from our results, Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] (2021) reported that students had a mean PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ and ‘psychological beliefs’ subscale score of 3.69 ± 0.58 and 2.62 ± 0.83, respectively. The difference in the results may be due to the type, site, severity, and frequency of pain, previous pain experiences, personal characteristics, and beliefs [11, 30]. Organic beliefs are beliefs that pain is associated with physical injury and damage, while psychological beliefs are beliefs that pain is of psychological origin [37]. Studies focus mostly on patients' pain beliefs [38, 39]. However, it is crucial to determine the pain beliefs of future nurses.

Participants had a high FPQ-III ‘severe pain’ subscale score (Table 2). Fear of minor pain is fear related to more common situations in everyday life. Fear of severe pain is fear related to more acute and severe situations. Fear of medical pain is fear related to medical interventions. Higher scores in FPQ-III indicate greater fear. In the study conducted by Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] with nursing students, the fear of severe pain subscale score was 3.28 ± 0.76, the minor pain fear subscale score was 2.55 ± 0.65, the medical pain fear subscale score was 2.75 ± 0.68 and fear of pain scale total score is 2.86 ± 0.57. Ünver and Turan [20] found students' fear of severe pain subscale score of 34.21 ± 6.66, minor fear of pain subscale score of 22.05 ± 5.05, fear of medical pain subscale score of 26.10 ± 6.80, and fear of pain scale total score of 82.38 ± 16.74. Similarly, in our study, the students' fear of severe pain score was found to be high. The high score of severe pain in nursing students can be explained by many reasons. The degree of pain perceived by the person is related to the meaning of the pain. The relationship between pain and fear is complex. Fear often increases the perception of pain, but pain also evokes fear. It is difficult to separate the two senses [40]. The fear of pain is related to the pain experiences of the individual in the past, and it increases especially as a result of painful situations that cannot be adequately managed. A fear of pain may develop in an individual who has experienced repetitive and intractable pain experiences [20, 41]. Fear of pain can cause one to change one's everyday life activities to avoid pain, which may result in one misinterpreting the severity of the pain one experiences [42]. Previous painful experiences, cultural norms, and the degree of perceived pain affect self-management approaches to pain [43]. We should identify the source of the fear of pain experienced or anticipated by students. In other words, we should determine whether they have a fear of pain associated with minor events, serious situations, or medical interventions to help them develop self-management strategies and provide better pain treatment to their patients in the future.

Table 3 shows the distribution of PBQ and FPQ-III scores by demographic characteristics. Female participants had higher PBQ ‘psychological beliefs’ and FPQ-III total and subscale scores than their male counterparts (Table 3). This result suggests that female and male students differ in whether they attribute pain to organic or psychological causes and why they fear pain. The effect of sex on perceived pain is still to be confirmed. Samulowitz et al. [44] argue that women are more sensitive to pain and more willing to report it than men. Babadağ and Alpaslan [11] also reported that female students had significantly higher ‘psychological beliefs’ scores than their male counterparts. Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] found that female students had higher PBQ ‘organic beliefs’ and FPQ-III total and severe pain and medical pain subscale scores than male students. However, Akkaya et al. [25] reported no difference in organic and psychological beliefs between male and female students [25]. Akkaya et al. [25] determined that third graders had higher ‘organic beliefs’ scores than first graders and higher ‘psychological beliefs’ scores than other grade levels. Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] also reported a relationship between grade level and organic beliefs. We also detected a relationship between grade level and PBQ ‘psychological beliefs’ and FPQ-III total and subscale scores. Especially second graders had higher scores than other graders. This result may be due to personal characteristics but also because second graders cope with more stressors during clinical practice as they have less experience. Bhurtun et al. [45] reported high-stress levels during clinical practice in second-grade nursing students. We think that this may have affected second-grade participants' pain beliefs and level of fear of pain. However, Babadağ and Alparaslan [11] reported no relationship between grade level and previous experiences of pain.

Participants who used non-pharmacological methods for pain relief had higher FPQ-III ‘severe pain’ scores than those who did not (Table 3). Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] also reported that students who used non-pharmacological methods had higher FPQ-III total and ‘severe pain’ subscale scores than those who did not. These results show that as the students' fear of pain increases, the rate of using non-pharmacological methods also increases.

In our study, the total scores of fear of medical pain and fear of pain of students who stated that their quality of life was affected due to pain were higher than those who stated that their quality of life was not affected. In addition, the difference between the groups was statistically significant (Table 3). Today, pain concerns a large part of the society; It has become a problem that significantly affects the physiological and psychosocial status and productivity of the individual. In cases where the pain is not managed well, it can lead to a decrease in quality of life, prolongation of the healing process, and adversely affect comfort levels [46, 47]. It can cause pain, anxiety, and emotional distress, harm well-being, affect functional capacity, and hinder the ability to fulfil family, social, and professional roles [48, 49]. The fear of pain in the individual emerges with pain experiences and/or learned pain behaviours. Repetitive and ineffectively coping pain causes anxiety in the individual [27, 50]. Because fear is a situation that arises when people feel in danger in reality or thought. It is a bad feeling felt in a perceived dangerous or risky situation [51]. The findings of this study, supporting the literature, show that individuals who stated that their quality of life was affected due to previous negative pain experiences are more afraid of experiencing a similar or uncertain situation again. As a result, there is a vicious circle between pain and quality of life. While pain causes a deterioration in the quality of life, the effect of the quality of life causes an increase in the severity of pain. If the nurse knows the effect of pain on patients, she can reveal the presence and characteristics (nature) of pain.

In our study, it was determined that the organic beliefs scores of the students who stated that they did not have knowledge about pain management were higher (Table 3). This suggests that students attribute pain only to organic causes. However, the International Association for the Study of Pain-IASP Taxonomy Committee has defined pain as ‘an unpleasant emotional sensation and behaviour that originates from a certain part of the body, is due to tissue damage or not, and is affected by the past experiences of the individual’ [52]. However, these beliefs and attitudes towards pain can be potential barriers to effective pain management. In studies on pain beliefs and coping strategies, it is stated that the beliefs of individuals experiencing pain about the psychological or organic origin of pain may cause differences in the strategy of coping with pain and the treatment process [37, 53].

Another remarkable finding in the study is that students who want to receive education on pain have high fear of severe pain scores and there is a statistically significant difference between the groups (Table 3). In particular, individuals who have experienced severe pain before may fear that they will experience severe pain again because their pain has not been relieved in the past. Looking at the concept of fear from a different perspective, it is a common, natural, and universal emotional state of all people, which enables people to cope with stressful life events and to take necessary precautions against danger by keeping the organism alert or in a state of alarm [54]. To control a subjective and preventable finding such as pain, the fear of pain should be made objectively visible. This situation suggests that students want to receive training to cope with the pain they experience effectively and to develop appropriate pain management strategies for patients in the clinic.

Psychological beliefs seem to have a stronger effect on the perception of severe pain, especially compared to organic beliefs. These findings suggest that organic and psychological beliefs may play different roles in the perception of pain, and psychological beliefs are more effective, especially in the perception of severe pain (Table 4). According to the regression analysis results, an increase in psychological beliefs was associated with an increase in individuals' fear of pain score. It can be thought that psychological meanings of pain may increase individuals' pain experience and their fear of pain due to this experience. However, the low explanatory power of the model (R2 = 0.021) emphasizes that this relationship is weak and other factors affecting fear of pain should be taken into consideration (Table 5). Köse Tosunöz and Deniz Doğan [55] found a moderately positive and statistically significant relationship between FPQ-III and organic beliefs mean scores (r = 0.340, p < 0.001). A weakly positive and statistically significant relationship was found between FPQ-III and psychological pain beliefs mean scores (r = 0.125, p < 0.001). In the regression analysis conducted in the same study, organic beliefs affect the level of fear of pain (p = 0.000). A one-unit increase in the organic beliefs variable increases the probability of fear of pain by 0.36 times, and the results show that as organic beliefs increase, fear of pain also increases [55]. In their study, Kılıçarslan and Erek Kazan [30] also determined that there is a very weak negative relationship between pain beliefs and fear of pain. Accordingly, the fear of pain decreases in students with high pain beliefs [30]. In conclusion, our study findings have both overlapping and divergent aspects with the results in the existing literature.

4.1 Limitations

This study had some limitations. The results were sample-specific, and therefore, cannot be generalised to all nursing students. The pain management education in the curriculum and the student's clinical experiences (clinical placement during studies) are also paraments impacting the beliefs and fears about pain. These parameters could not be evaluated in detail due to the different applications of pain management training and clinical practices at each grade level in the institution where the study was conducted.

5 Conclusion

Participants had high ‘psychological beliefs’ and ‘severe pain’ scores. Their pain beliefs and fear of pain were affected by gender, grade level, previous experience of pain, and non-pharmacological pain relief methods. Pain is critical in nursing education. These results can guide us on better developing and implementing nursing education on pain management or incorporate pain education in the nursing curriculum. Therefore, nursing programmes should provide more pain-related content to help students learn pain management, develop clinical decision-making skills, and improve their positive attitudes towards pain. Undergraduate nursing programmes should incorporate interactive training strategies (case-based learning, role-play, brainstorming, etc.) to help students learn effective coping methods and recognise their own pain beliefs and attitudes towards pain. Establishing simulation laboratories where students can experience all pain-related processes is also important in gaining knowledge and skills on pain management.

Author Contributions

All authors have agreed on the final version and meet at least one of the following criteria. Kamile Kırca: study design, data curation, writing review, methodology, investigation. Hüsna Özveren: study design, data curation, writing review, methodology, investigation, writing review and editing. Tuba Karabey: data curation, writing review, methodology.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank all Turkish students who participated in the students.

    Conflicts of Interest

    The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

    Data Availability Statement

    The data supporting this study's findings are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

      The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.