Volume 28, Issue 2 pp. 324-331
ORIGINAL PAPER

The radical and requisite openness of viable systems: Implications for healthcare strategy and practice

Felice Borghmans

Corresponding Author

Felice Borghmans

BSN, GradDip(CritCare), MoL, PhD Candidate

Faculty of Education, Monash University, Wellington Road, Clayton, Victoria, 3800 Australia

Correspondence

Felice Borghmans, Monash University, 7 Heysen Drive, Skye, VIC 3977, Australia.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 11 May 2021

Abstract

This paper addresses an ontological question about the nature of health and challenges some underpinning assumptions in western healthcare. In its analysis, health in its various statuses, is framed as a naturally occurring complex adaptive system made up of dynamically interacting subsystems that include the physiological, psychological, and social realms. Furthermore, openness in complex systems such as health, is necessary for the exchange of energy, information, and resources. Yet, within healthcare much effort is invested in constraining systems' behaviours, whether they be systems of knowledge, health, healthcare, and more. This paper draws on the complexity sciences and Levinasian philosophy to explicate the essential role of system openness in individual, population, and systemic viability. It highlights holism to be “not whole-ism”, and system openness to be, not just a reality, but a critical feature of viability. Hence requisite openness is advocated as essential to efficacious and ethical healthcare practice and strategy, and vital for health.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The paper’s author has no conflict of interest to declare.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.