Ultraviolet radiation (UVR) induces various alterations of the skin and plays a decisive part regarding the development of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer. For a closer examination of these phenomena in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM) is one of the most eligible options as it represents a diagnostic tool that allows a non-invasive examination of the skin, showing microanatomical structures and individual cells.

Objectives

The aim of this study was using RCM to observe alterations of the skin induced by UVR and to describe the development of these changes. In addition, the findings were compared with histological examinations of the same area.

Methods

A small area in the gluteal region of 10 healthy subjects was exposed to a threefold individual minimal erythema dose of solar-simulated UVR. The following development of the sunburn reaction was evaluated with RCM 1, 24, 72 h and 1 week after UVR exposure. Furthermore, RCM images of unexposed skin were obtained, serving as a reference. To contrast histological examination with RCM, punch biopsies were performed at each point in time. The obtained data were interpreted regarding histological and RCM-based criteria on sunburn reaction.

Results

All important UVR-induced alterations of the skin could be shown in RCM beginning with an inflammatory reaction (inflammatory cells, vasodilatation, oedema), containing the formation of microvesicles, followed by the appearance of apoptotic keratinocytes (sunburn cells), activated melanocytes and at last, loss of the epidermal structure. There was an excellent correlation between RCM and histological features.

Conclusions

Reflectance confocal microscopy is a highly valuable tool for non-invasive monitoring of UVR-induced changes of the skin over time. Furthermore, RCM provides a more detailed visualization of inflammatory cell formation and epidermal blood flow than histological examination can.

References

1Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer–the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 624: 89–103.
10.1007/978-0-387-77574-6_8
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2Armstrong BK, Kricker A, English DR. Sun exposure and skin cancer. Australas J Dermatol 1997; 38(Suppl 1): 1–6.
10.1111/j.1440-0960.1997.tb01000.x
PubMed Google Scholar
3Armstrong BK, Kricker A. The epidemiology of UV induced skin cancer. J Photochem Photobiol, B 2001; 63: 8–18.
10.1016/S1011-1344(01)00198-1
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4Soter NA. Acute effects of ultraviolet radiation on the skin. Semin Dermatol 1990; 9: 11–15.
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5Hruza LL, Pentland AP. Mechanisms of UV-induced inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 1993; 100: 35S–41S.
10.1038/jid.1993.21
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6Gilchrest BA, Soter NA, Stoff JS, Mihm MC. The human sunburn reaction: histologic and biochemical studies. J Am Acad Dermatol 1981; 5: 411–422.
10.1016/S0190-9622(81)70103-8
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7Van Laethem A, Claerhout S, Garmyn M, Agostinis P. The sunburn cell: regulation of death and survival of the keratinocyte. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 2005; 37: 1547–1553.
10.1016/j.biocel.2005.02.015
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8Gilchrest BA, Soter NA, Hawk JL et al. Histologic changes associated with ultraviolet A–induced erythema in normal human skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 1983; 9: 213–219.
10.1016/S0190-9622(83)70131-3
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9Rajadhyaksha M, Gonzalez S, Zavislan JM et al. In vivo confocal scanning laser microscopy of human skin II: advances in instrumentation and comparison with histology. J Invest Dermatol 1999; 113: 293–303.
10.1046/j.1523-1747.1999.00690.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10Calzavara-Pinton P, Longo C, Venturini M et al. Reflectance confocal microscopy for in vivo skin imaging. Photochem Photobiol 2008; 84: 1421–1430.
10.1111/j.1751-1097.2008.00443.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
11Ulrich M, Ruter C, Astner S et al. Comparison of UV-induced skin changes in sun-exposed vs. sun-protected skin - preliminary evaluation by reflectance confocal microscopy. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161(Suppl 3): 46–53.
10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09449.x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12Gambichler T, Huyn J, Tomi NS et al. A comparative pilot study on ultraviolet-induced skin changes assessed by noninvasive imaging techniques in vivo. Photochem Photobiol 2006; 82: 1103–1107.
10.1562/2005-12-21-RA-757
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13Yamashita T, Akita H, Astner S et al. In vivo assessment of pigmentary and vascular compartments changes in UVA exposed skin by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy. Exp Dermatol 2007; 16: 905–911.
10.1111/j.1600-0625.2007.00604.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14Middelkamp-Hup MA, Park HY, Lee J et al. Detection of UV-induced pigmentary and epidermal changes over time using in vivo reflectance confocal microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 2006; 126: 402–407.
10.1038/sj.jid.5700055
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15Yamashita T, Kuwahara T, Gonzalez S, Takahashi M. Non-invasive visualization of melanin and melanocytes by reflectance-mode confocal microscopy. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124: 235–240.
10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23562.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
16Gambichler T, Sauermann K, Altintas MA et al. Effects of repeated sunbed exposures on the human skin. In vivo measurements with confocal microscopy. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed 2004; 20: 27–32.
10.1111/j.1600-0781.2004.00079.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
17Hofmann-Wellenhof R, Smolle J, Roschger A et al. Sunburn cell formation, dendritic cell migration, and immunomodulatory factor production after solar-simulated irradiation of sunscreen-treated human skin explants in vitro. J Invest Dermatol 2004; 123: 781–787.
10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23322.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
18Wolf P, Hoffmann C, Quehenberger F et al. Immune protection factors of chemical sunscreens measured in the local contact hypersensitivity model in humans. J Invest Dermatol 2003; 121: 1080–1087.
10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12361.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
19Gerger A, Koller S, Kern T et al. Diagnostic applicability of in vivo confocal laser scanning microscopy in melanocytic skin tumors. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124: 493–498.
10.1111/j.0022-202X.2004.23569.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
20Gerger A, Koller S, Weger W et al. Sensitivity and specificity of confocal laser-scanning microscopy for in vivo diagnosis of malignant skin tumors. Cancer 2006; 107: 193–200.
10.1002/cncr.21910
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
21Skvara H, Kittler H, Schmid JA et al. In vivo fluorescence confocal microscopy: indocyanine green enhances the contrast of epidermal and dermal structures. J Biomed Opt 2011; 16: 096010.
10.1117/1.3625255
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
22Tadokoro T, Yamaguchi Y, Batzer J et al. Mechanisms of skin tanning in different racial/ethnic groups in response to ultraviolet radiation. J Invest Dermatol 2005; 124: 1326–1332.
10.1111/j.0022-202X.2005.23760.x
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
23Sanchez WY, Obispo C, Ryan E et al. Changes in the redox state and endogenous fluorescence of in vivo human skin due to intrinsic and photo-aging, measured by multiphoton tomography with fluorescence lifetime imaging. J Biomed Opt 2013; 18: 061217.
10.1117/1.JBO.18.6.061217
Web of Science® Google Scholar
24Gambichler T, Jaedicke V, Terras S. Optical coherence tomography in dermatology: technical and clinical aspects. Arch Dermatol Res 2011; 303: 457–473.
10.1007/s00403-011-1152-x
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Citing Literature

Volume28, Issue8

August 2014

Pages 1061-1068

UV-induced alterations of the skin evaluated over time by reflectance confocal microscopy

Conflicts of interest

Funding sources

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

References

Citing Literature

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

UV-induced alterations of the skin evaluated over time by reflectance confocal microscopy

Conflicts of interest

Funding sources

Abstract

Background

Objectives

Methods

Results

Conclusions

References

Citing Literature

References

Related

Information