Dr. Takigawa belongs to the endowment department associated with Medtronic Japan, Boston Scientific, Japan Lifeline, and WIN International. Dr. Takigawa receives honoraria and speaker fees from Abbott.

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

The authors have nothing to report.

References

1R. A. Winkle, “HPSD Ablation for AF High-Power Short-Duration RF Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Review,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 32 (2021): 2813–2823.
10.1111/jce.14863
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
2W. H. Sauer and O. Kreidieh, “Precision Medicine and Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmias: The Difficulty of Estimating Lesion Size and Durability,” JACC. Clinical electrophysiology 9 (2023): 341–344.
10.1016/j.jacep.2022.10.037
PubMed Google Scholar
3B. Howard, D. E. Haines, A. Verma, et al., “Reduction in Pulmonary Vein Stenosis and Collateral Damage With Pulsed Field Ablation Compared With Radiofrequency Ablation in a Canine Model,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 13 (2020): e008337, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008337.
10.1161/CIRCEP.120.008337
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
4J. S. Koruth, K. Kuroki, I. Kawamura, et al., “Pulsed Field Ablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation: Esophageal Injury in a Novel Porcine Model,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 13 (2020): e008303, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008303.
10.1161/CIRCEP.119.008303
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
5J. C. Hsu, D. Gibson, R. Banker, et al., “In Vivo Porcine Characterization of Atrial Lesion Safety and Efficacy Utilizing a Circular Pulsed-Field Ablation Catheter Including Assessment of Collateral Damage to Adjacent Tissue in Supratherapeutic Ablation Applications,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 33 (2022): 1480–1488.
10.1111/jce.15522
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
6B. Howard, D. E. Haines, A. Verma, et al., “Characterization of Phrenic Nerve Response to Pulsed Field Ablation,” Circulation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology 15 (2022): e010127, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127.
10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010127
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
7A. Verma, D. E. Haines, L. V. Boersma, et al., “Pulsed Field Ablation for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation: Pulsed AF Pivotal Trial,” Circulation 147 (2023): 1422–1432.
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.123.063988
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
8E. Anter, M. Mansour, D. G. Nair, et al., “Dual-Energy Lattice-Tip Ablation System for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Trial,” Nature Medicine 30 (2024): 2303–2310, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-024-03022-6.
10.1038/s41591-024-03022-6
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
9V. Y. Reddy, E. P. Gerstenfeld, A. Natale, et al., “Pulsed Field or Conventional Thermal Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation,” New England Journal of Medicine 389 (2023): 1660–1671.
10.1056/NEJMoa2307291
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
10A. Verma, S. J. Asivatham, T. Deneke, Q. Castellvi, and R. E. Neal, “ Primer on Pulsed Electrical Field Ablation: Understanding the Benefits and Limitations,” Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 14, no. 9 (2021): e010086, https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010086.
10.1161/CIRCEP.121.010086
Google Scholar
11K. R. J. Chun, D. Miklavčič, K. Vlachos, et al., “State-of-the-Art Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias: Ongoing Evolution and Future Perspective,” Europace 26 (2024): euae134, https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae134.
10.1093/europace/euae134
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
12Belalcazar A, Heist EK. “Comparison of Efficiency of PFA Catheter Designs by Computer Modeling,” Journal of Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 35 (2024): 2382–2393, https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16459.
10.1111/jce.16459
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
13R. van Es, M. H. A. Groen, M. Stehouwer, P. A. Doevendans, F. H. M. Wittkampf, and K. Neven, “In Vitro Analysis of the Origin and Characteristics of Gaseous Microemboli During Catheter Electroporation Ablation,” Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology 30 (2019): 2071–2079.
10.1111/jce.14091
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
14P. Osmancik, B. Bacova, D. Herman, et al., “Periprocedural Intravascular Hemolysis During Atrial Fibrillation Ablation,” JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology 10 (2024): 1660–1671.
10.1016/j.jacep.2024.05.001
PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
15R. P. Rother, L. Bell, P. Hillmen, and M. T. Gladwin, “The Clinical Sequelae of Intravascular Hemolysis and Extracellular Plasma Hemoglobin A Novel Mechanism of Human Disease,” JAMA 293 (2005 6): 1653–1662.
10.1001/jama.293.13.1653
CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar

Volume35, Issue12

December 2024

Pages 2394-2396

Editorial: Comparison of Efficiency of PFA Catheter Designs by Computer Modeling

Conflicts of interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

Editorial: Comparison of Efficiency of PFA Catheter Designs by Computer Modeling

Conflicts of interest

Open Research

Data Availability Statement

References

References

Related

Information