Volume 35, Issue 11 pp. 2237-2241
BRIEF COMMUNICATION

Calcium channel blockers and beta blockers in pediatric supraventricular tachycardia

John Sullivan MD

Corresponding Author

John Sullivan MD

Department of Pediatrics, Yale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Correspondence John Sullivan, MD, Department of Pediatrics, Yale New Haven Children's Hospital, New Haven, CT, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Anthony G. Pompa MD

Anthony G. Pompa MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonah Schieber BS

Jonah Schieber BS

Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Gaurav Arora MD

Gaurav Arora MD

Division of Cardiology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Audrey Dionne MD

Audrey Dionne MD

Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Cheyenne Beach MD

Cheyenne Beach MD

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Cardiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 September 2024
Citations: 1

Disclosures: None.

Abstract

Introduction

Supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) is a common pediatric arrhythmia. Beta blockers (BBs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are used for treatment despite little data examining their use. We describe the prescriptive tendencies, efficacy, and tolerability of BBs and CCBs used in the treatment of pediatric SVT.

Methods and Results

This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study from three academic children's hospitals. Individuals aged 1–21 years at time of SVT diagnosis initiated on a BB or a CCB between 01/01/2010 and 12/31/2020 were included. Exclusion criteria were pre-excitation, ectopic atrial tachycardia, and hemodynamically significant heart disease. Demographic, comorbidity, symptomatology, and medication data were collected. Treatment success was defined using a composite data abstraction tool. Of 164 patients, 151 received a BB and 13 received a CCB. The success rate on the initial dosage was 46% for both BB and CCB; the success rate following dosage adjustments was also comparable for BBs (98/151, 65%) and CCBs (9/13, 69%). While 27 (18%) BB patients experienced intolerable side effects, no CCB patient did.

Conclusion

Treatment with a BB or CCB was successful in half of patients. BBs were prescribed more frequently than CCBs but were associated with more side effects.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.