Volume 31, Issue 12 pp. 3251-3261
ORIGINAL - ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY

Clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics, and catheter ablation results of left upper septal premature ventricular complexes

Sedat Kose MD

Sedat Kose MD

Department of Cardiology, Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Veysel K. Vurgun MD

Corresponding Author

Veysel K. Vurgun MD

Department of Cardiology, Ankara Liv Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Correspondence Veysel K. Vurgun MD, Department of Cardiology, Ankara Liv Hospital, Kavaklidere, Bestekar St No. 8, 06680 Cankaya/Ankara, Turkey.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Yalcin Gokoglan MD

Yalcin Gokoglan MD

Department of Cardiology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Mehmet Balli MD

Mehmet Balli MD

Department of Cardiology, Mersin City Hospital, Mersin, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
Hasan K. Kabul MD

Hasan K. Kabul MD

Department of Cardiology, Gulhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 October 2020
Citations: 3

Disclosures: None.

[Correction added on 28 October 2020, after first online publication: Conclusion part of the abstract has been added.]

Abstract

Background

To investigate the clinical, electrocardiographic and electrophysiological characteristics, and results of catheter ablation of left upper septal (LUS) premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) arising from the proximal left fascicular system.

Methods

Thirty-one patients who had undergone radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for idiopathic PVCs were enrolled in the study. All PVCs presented with narrow QRS complexes (<110 ms) with precordial QRS morphology of incomplete right bundle branch block type or identical to the sinus rhythm (SR) QRS morphology. RFCA was applied to the LUS area where the earliest fascicular potential (FP) was recorded during mapping.

Results

The mean QRS duration during SR and PVCs were 92.3 ± 7.9 and 103.2 ± 7.3 ms, respectively. The mean fascicular potential-ventricular interval during PVC at the target site was 32.7 ± 2.7 ms. The mean His-ventricular (H-V) interval during SR and PVCs were 45.1 ± 2.7 and 21.3 ± 3.6 ms, respectively. Left anterior hemiblock/left posterior hemiblock and left bundle branch block (LBBB) were observed in 16 (53.3%) and 4 (12.9%) patients after RFCA, respectively. The His to FP interval in SR and H-V interval during PVC were found as significant markers for predicting the postablation LBBB. RFCA was acutely successful in 29 of 31 patients (93.5%) in the first procedure. Two patients had a recurrence of PVCs during follow-up and one of them underwent a second successful ablation. The overall success rate was 90.3% (28/31) in a mean follow-up duration of 24.3 ± 15.4 months.

Conclusions

LUS-PVCs have distinctive electrocardiographic and electrophysiologic characteristics and can be managed successfully by focal RFCA with detailed FP mapping of the left upper septum with a mild risk of left bundle branch injury.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.